Effect of residual stresses on fatigue crack growth behavior of aluminum substrate repaired with a bonded composite patch
Source abstract
Abstract
Composite patches bonded to cracked metallic aircraft structures have been shown to be a highly cost-effective method for extending the service life of the structures. The fatigue crack growth behavior of pre-cracked 7075-T6 aluminum substrate with the 12.7-mm V-notch crack repaired with boron/epoxy composite patches was investigated. 1-ply, 2-ply, 3-ply and 4-ply composite patches were studied. The residual stresses due to mismatch of the coefficients of thermal expansion between the aluminum plate and boron/epoxy composite patch were calculated based on the classical equation. The effects of the residual stresses and patch layers on fatigue lifetime, fatigue crack growth rate, and fatigue failure mode of the repaired plates were examined experimentally. A modified analytical model, based on Rose's analytical solution and Paris power law, was developed for this research. This model considered the residual stress effect and successfully predicted the fatigue lifetime of the patched plates. Results showed that the composite patch had two competing impacts on the structure. The composite patch could cause residual tensile stress in the aluminum substrate, which could consequently increase the crack growth rate. Moreover, reinforcement with the composite patch could also retard the crack propagation in the aluminum plate. If a 4-ply composite patch was used, it resulted in high residual stresses and effectively would not extend the fatigue lifetime of cracked aluminum plates.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1163/156856199X0034310.1163/156856199X00343 ↗
2. Jones R. · Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. · 1999 · 32 · 8110.1016/S0167-8442(99)00029-4 ↗
3. Kumar A. M. · Composit. Struct. · 2000 · 49 · 28510.1016/S0263-8223(00)00005-2 ↗
4. Wang W. C. · Composit. Struct. · 2000 · 49 · 41510.1016/S0263-8223(00)00076-3 ↗
5. Baker A. · Composites · 1999 · 47 · 431
6. Schubbe J. J. · Composit. Struct. · 1999 · 45 · 18510.1016/S0263-8223(99)00025-2 ↗
7. Naboulsi S. · Composit. Struct. · 1996 · 35 · 29510.1016/0263-8223(96)00043-8 ↗
8. Hall S. R. · Composites · 1989 · 20 · 47910.1016/0010-4361(89)90218-8 ↗
9. Baker A. A. · Composites · 1987 · 18 · 29310.1016/0010-4361(87)90293-X ↗
10. Trego L. · Aerospace Eng. · 1996 · 16 · 13
11. Bouschlicher M. R. · Am. J. Dent. · 1997 · 10 · 279
12. Kupiec K. A. · J. Dental. Res. · 1997 · 76 · 2919
13. Paul J. · Eng. Fracture Mech. · 1994 · 48 · 45510.1016/0013-7944(94)90134-1 ↗
14. Naboulsi S. · Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. · 1997 · 26 · 110.1016/S0167-8442(96)00028-6 ↗
15. Zimmerman K. B. · Expl. Mech. · 1996 · 36 · 14210.1007/BF02328710 ↗
16. Stone M. H. · VIDE-Sci. Techn. Appl. · 1994 · 272 · 289
17. Tay T. E. · Composit. Struct. · 1996 · 34 · 33910.1016/0263-8223(95)00159-X ↗
18. Reithmaier, L. 1981.Aircraft Repair Manual, 257–266. Palmdale, CA: Palomer Books.
19. Erdogan F. · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1972 · 4 · 44910.1016/0013-7944(72)90057-4 ↗
20. Rao V. V. · Composites: Part B · 1999 · 30 · 62110.1016/S1359-8368(99)00024-4 ↗
21. Rose L. R. F. · Int. J. Fract. · 1982 · 18 · 13510.1007/BF00019638 ↗
22. Kam T. Y. · AIAA J. · 1998 · 36 · 64510.2514/2.418 ↗
23. Denney J. J. · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1997 · 57 · 50710.1016/S0013-7944(97)00050-7 ↗
24. Naboulsi S. · Composit. Struct. · 1997 · 37 · 32110.1016/S0263-8223(98)80003-2 ↗
25. Marceau J. A. · SAMPE J. · 1977 · 22 · 64
26. Mostovoy S. · 1975
27. Mall, S., Johnson, W. S. and Everett, R. A. 1984.Adhesive Joints: Formation, Characteristics and Testing, Edited by: Mittal, K. L. 639–658. New York, NY: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4613-2749-3_38 ↗
28. Liechti K. M. · 1986
29. Paris P. C. · J. Basic Eng. Trans. ASME · 1963 · 85 · 52810.1115/1.3656900 ↗
30. Makoto I. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 1984 · 29 · 37310.1002/app.1984.070290135 ↗
31. 10.1163/156856195X0108510.1163/156856195X01085 ↗
32. Lin C. C. · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1993 · 46 · 100510.1016/0013-7944(93)90151-H ↗
33. Naboulsi S. · J. Strain Anal. Eng. Design · 1999 · 34 · 39510.1243/0309324991513849 ↗
34. Naboulsi S. · Composit. Struct. · 1997 · 41 · 30310.1016/S0263-8223(98)00052-X ↗
35. Chue C. H. · Appl. Composit. Mater. · 1996 · 3 · 35510.1007/BF00133679 ↗
36. Tarn J. Q. · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1991 · 40 · 105510.1016/0013-7944(91)90170-6 ↗
37. Young A. · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 1992 · 29 · 220110.1016/0020-7683(92)90066-3 ↗
38. Salgado N. K. · Int. J. Num. Methods Eng. · 1998 · 42 · 9510.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19980530)42:2<195::AID-NME354>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
39. Zhong W. H. · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 1999 · 7 · 8
40. Zhong W. H. · 1994
41. Gu Z. F. · Acta Mater. Composit. Sin. · 1995 · 12 · 12
42. Zhong W. H. · New Type Carbon Materials · 2000 · 15 · 18
43. Chudnovsky, A. 1996.Proc. 10th US National Conf. Appl. Mech, 97–101. New York, NY: ASME.
44. Aglan H. · Int. J. Fract. · 1990 · 44 · 16710.1007/BF00035514 ↗
45. Aglan H. · J. Mater. Sci. · 1994 · 29 · 8610.1007/BF00356524 ↗
46. Aglan H. · J. Eng. Mech. · 1993 · 119 · 124310.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1993)119:6(1243) ↗
47. Aglan H. · Int. J. Fract. · 1989 · 40 · 28510.1007/BF00963662 ↗
48. Aglan, H., Othman, A. and Figueroa, L. 1994.Trans. Research Record 144957–63. Washington, DC
49. Young, A., Cartwright, D. J. and Rooke, D. P. 1989.Proceedings of the International Conference on Fatigue, Corrosion, Cracking, Fracture Mechanics and Failure Analysis339–346. Salt Lake City, UT
50. Young A. · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 1992 · 29 · 220110.1016/0020-7683(92)90066-3 ↗
51. Schubbe J. J. · Eng. Fract. Mech. · 1999 · 63 · 30510.1016/S0013-7944(99)00032-6 ↗
52. Hellan, K. 1984.Introduction to Fracture Mechanics, 244–251. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.