journal article·2002-01

The effect of moisture on the failure locus and fracture energy of an epoxy–steel interface

W. K. Loh, A. D. Crocombe, M. M. Abdel Wahab, J. F. Watts, I. A. Ashcroft

Publisher page

Abstract

Experimental studies have been undertaken that provide the fracture energy of an epoxy-steel interface that has been exposed to various uptake levels of moisture. The test configuration used for these studies is the mixed mode flexure (MMF) test. The specimens have been exposed to the moist environment as open-faced specimens. The results provided by the test show a steady degradation in the interface fracture energy with increasing moisture content. Surface characterisation techniques such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to characterise the nature of the failure surfaces. Both of these analyses show a reduction of adhesive fragments and carbon overlayer thickness on the steel fracture surface with increasing moisture levels. The variation of carbon overlayer thickness with moisture exhibits a similar trend as the fracture energy, indicating that the two may be related.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Abdel Wahab M. M. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 2002 · 22 · 6110.1016/S0143-7496(01)00037-9 ↗
2. Crocombe, A. D., Hambly, H. O. and Pan, J. 1998.Proc. 1st World Congress on Adhesion and Related Phenomena1.2.1–1.2.3. Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany10.1163/156856198X00849 ↗
3. Gledhill R. A. · J. Adhesion · 1980 · 11 · 310.1080/00218468008078901 ↗
4. Kinloch A. J. · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 454310.1016/S1359-6454(00)00240-8 ↗
5. Watts J. F. · J. Mater. Sci. · 1984 · 19 · 345910.1007/BF00549839 ↗
6. Watts J. F. · J. Adhesion · 1989 · 31 · 7310.1080/00218468908048215 ↗
7. Chang, T., Lai, Y. H., Shephard, N. E., Sproat, E. A. and Dillard, D. A. 1995.Proceeding of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Adhesion Society108–109. Hilton Head, South Carolina
8. Wylde J.W. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 1998 · 18 · 23710.1016/S0143-7496(98)00028-1 ↗
9. Crocombe A. D. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 1997 · 17 · 22910.1016/S0143-7496(97)00008-0 ↗
10. Moidu A. J. K. · J. Adhesion · 1998 · 65 · 23910.1080/00218469808012248 ↗
11. Hambly H. O. · 1998
12. Cowling M. J. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 2000 · 20 · 32310.1016/S0143-7496(99)00063-9 ↗
13. Brockmann, W. 1983.Durability of Structural Adhesives, Edited by: Kinloch, A. J. 288–289. Elsevier Applied Science.
14. Roy S. · Polym. Polym. Composite · 2000 · 8 · 29510.1177/0967391120000805295 ↗
15. Bowditch M. R. · Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 1996 · 16 · 7310.1016/0143-7496(96)00001-2 ↗
16. 10.1163/1568561005106675810.1163/15685610051066758 ↗
17. Crocombe, A. D., Abdel Wahab, M. M. and Loh, W. K. 2000.Proc. 5th European Adhesion Conference (Euradh ’2000)616–621. Lyon, France