Study of tack properties of uncrosslinked natural rubber
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this study was to better understand the effect of non-rubber substances (mainly proteins and lipids) on adhesion (against glasses) and self-adhesion tack properties of uncrosslinked natural rubber (NR). Various types of NR, with or without non-rubber constituents, were prepared. Synthetic polyisoprene rubber was also used as a reference material. All the rubbers were first characterized by many techniques (FT-IR, DSC, GPC, etc.). Two experimental tests were specially utilized to measure the level of adhesion and self-adhesion: (i) at very short contact times (from a few milliseconds up to 0.1 s) the impact of a pendulum and (ii) for longer contact times (from 0.1 s to a few h) the contact of a probe using a tensile testing machine. The tack energy increased with contact time for all the rubbers studied. Natural rubber which did not contain proteins and lipids exhibited the highest adhesion and self-adhesion tack abilities. In contrast, whole natural rubber, containing both proteins and lipids, showed the lowest tack property. In each case, self-adhesion levels are higher than those of adhesion, presumably due to interdiffusion of macromolecular chains or chain segments at the interface. Keywords: NATURAL RUBBERNON-RUBBER CONSTITUENTSADHESIONTACKINTERDIFFUSIONPENDULUM TESTPROBE TEST
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Suchiva K. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2000 · 78 · 149510.1002/1097-4628(20001121)78:8<1495::AID-APP50>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
2. Wetzel F. H. · ASTM Bull. · 1957 · 64
3. Creton C. · Langmuir · 2001 · 17 · 494810.1021/la010117g ↗
4. Zosel A. · Intl. J. Adhesion Adhesives · 1998 · 18 · 26510.1016/S0143-7496(98)80060-2 ↗
5. Creton C. · J. Polym. Sci., Part B Polym. Phys. · 1996 · 34 · 54510.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(199602)34:3<545::AID-POLB13>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
6. Hamed G. R. · Rubber Chem. Technol. · 1981 · 54 · 40310.5254/1.3535813 ↗
7. David M. O. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2000 · 78 · 148610.1002/1097-4628(20001121)78:8<1486::AID-APP40>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
8. Wu S. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1969 · 31 · 15310.1016/0021-9797(69)90321-X ↗
9. Schultz J. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1977 · 59 · 27210.1016/0021-9797(77)90008-X ↗
10. Schultz J. · J. Colloid Interface Sci. · 1977 · 59 · 27710.1016/0021-9797(77)90009-1 ↗
11. Schultz J. · 1992
12. Williams M. L. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1955 · 77 · 370110.1021/ja01619a008 ↗
13. Ahagon A. · Polym. Sci.J., Polym. Phys. Edn. · 1975 · 13 · 190310.1002/pol.1975.180131005 ↗
14. Gent A. N. · Rubber Chem. Technol. · 1990 · 63 · 61310.5254/1.3538277 ↗
15. Sitthai-Nipithakul, T. 2000. Mulhouse, France: Université de Haute Alsace. PhD Thesis
16. Kawahara S. · Rubber Chem. Technol. · 2002 · 75 · 73910.5254/1.3544999 ↗
17. Tangpakdee J. · Rubber Chem. Technol. · 1997 · 70 · 70710.5254/1.3538454 ↗
18. Allen P. W. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 1961 · 5 · 51010.1002/app.1961.070051703 ↗
19. Grechanovskii V. A. · Rubber Chem. Technol. · 1973 · 46 · 125610.5254/1.3547433 ↗
20. Ferry J. D. · 1980
21. Barquins M. · J. Adhesion · 1981 · 13 · 5310.1080/00218468108073174 ↗
22. Gent A. N. · J. Adhesion · 1972 · 3 · 28110.1080/00218467208072199 ↗
23. Maugis D. · J. Mater. Sci. · 1985 · 20 · 304110.1007/BF00545170 ↗
24. Roberts A. D. · Wear · 1977 · 42 · 11910.1016/0043-1648(77)90173-9 ↗