Bond strength analysis of post-installed rebar with chemical adhesive in concrete mixed with marble powder and glass fiber
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of marble powder as a part of fine aggregate and the addition of glass fiber on the bond strength of concrete and deformed high-strength post-installed steel rebars using the epoxy chemical as an adhesive. Five marble dust powder (MDP) substitution percentages (i.e. 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 35%) and the addition of glass fiber (i.e. 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5%) were used. The performance of deformed high-strength post-installed rebars in conventional concrete and concrete modified with 35% marble powder and 1% glass fiber was examined here utilizing pull-out tests on a total of 96 specimens. To examine the bond behaviors of deformed high-strength post-installed rebars at the epoxy–conventional concrete interface and epoxy-modified concrete with MDP and glass fiber interface, test criteria included concrete compressive strength, anchorage depth of rebar into concrete, rebar diameter, and concrete cover to rebar diameter ratio. For post-installed high-strength deformed rebar, bond stress–slip relationships were determined, examined, and subsequently compared with prior work and readily available codes. It was found that none of the specimens exhibited pull-out failure and that the majority of them displayed concrete splitting, concrete rapture, or rebar rapture failure. This suggests that epoxy resins are particularly successful as bonding agents to retrofit concrete structures at the steel–concrete contact. A closed-form equation for predicting the bond strength for post-installed high-strength deformed rebar was also created using regression analyses on the experimental data. With a significant coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.85) the observed predicted bond strengths and the test data were quite similar.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.07010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.070 ↗
2. Adesina A. Recent advances in the concrete industry to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions. Environmental Challenges. 2020 1 p100004.10.1016/j.envc.2020.100004 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.005 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.05310.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.053 ↗
5. Fernandes HR, Torres P, Agathopoulos S, et al. Utilization of solid wastes from granite cutting processing in porcelain industry. Al-Azhar Bulletin of Science March. 2003:33-43.
6. Demirel B. The effect of the using waste marble dust as fine sand on the mechanical properties of the concrete. International journal of the physical sciences. 2010; 5(9): 1372–1380.
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.013 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.02610.1016/j.engstruct.2013.11.026 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.07910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.079 ↗
10. Ferguson PM, Cowan HJ. Reinforced concrete fundamentals: SI version. 4th ed., metric ed. New York (NY): Wiley; 1981.
11. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.11202610.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112026 ↗
12. Darwin D, Dolan CW, Nilson AH. Design of concrete structures, 15th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Education; 2016.
13. 10.14359/52210.14359/522 ↗
14. Eligehausen R, Cook RA, Appl J. Behavior and design of adhesive bonded anchors. ACI Structural J. 2006;103:822–831.
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000028710.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000287 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:9(2744)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:9(2744) ↗
17. 10.1680/macr.1996.48.175.7910.1680/macr.1996.48.175.79 ↗
18. 10.14359/1014910.14359/10149 ↗
19. Gesoglu M, Özturan T, Özel M, et al. Tensile behavior of post-installed anchors in plain and steel fiber-reinforced normal- and high-strength concretes. ACI Structural J. 2005;102:224–231.
20. Gurbuz T, Ilki A. Pullout performance of fully and partially bonded retrofit anchors in low-strength concrete. ACI Structural J. 2011;108:61–70.
21. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.02810.1016/j.engstruct.2015.06.028 ↗
22. 10.1080/01694243.2012.68755210.1080/01694243.2012.687552 ↗
23. 10.14359/1517810.14359/15178 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.007 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1996)8:4(208)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1996)8:4(208) ↗
26. 10.1016/S0950-0618(02)00101-010.1016/S0950-0618(02)00101-0 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.006 ↗
28. De Anda L, Courtier C, Moehle JP. Bond strength of prefabricated epoxy-coated reinforcement. ACI Structural J. 2006;103:226–234.
29. 10.1617/s11527-008-9440-410.1617/s11527-008-9440-4 ↗
30. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.701.3210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.701.32 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.istruc.2016.06.01010.1016/j.istruc.2016.06.010 ↗
32. Tayeh BA, El dada ZM, Shihada S, et al. Pull-out behavior of post installed rebar connections using chemical adhesives and cement based binders. J King Saud Univ – Eng Sci. 2019;31:332–339.
33. 10.1080/01694243.2018.154747310.1080/01694243.2018.1547473 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.tust.2018.11.03510.1016/j.tust.2018.11.035 ↗
35. 10.1617/s11527-019-1356-710.1617/s11527-019-1356-7 ↗
36. 10.1163/15685610483926610.1163/156856104839266 ↗
37. 10.1163/15685610175320770610.1163/156856101753207706 ↗
38. 10.1163/15685610074274410.1163/156856100742744 ↗
39. 10.1163/156856104270835910.1163/1568561042708359 ↗
40. Zhang B Benmokrane B. Pullout bond properties of fiber-reinforced polymer tendons to grout. Journal of materials in civil engineering. 2002; 14(5): 399–408.10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:5(399) ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.021 ↗
42. 10.1617/s11527-009-9515-x10.1617/s11527-009-9515-x ↗
43. ACI 355.4. Qualification of post-installed adhesive anchors in concrete (ACI 355.4–19) and commentary. Farmington Hills MI: American Concrete Institute (ACI); 2019.
44. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Ordinary Portland cement 43 grade—specification. IS:8112 New Delhi; 2013
45. ASTM-C150/C150M. Standard specification for portland cement. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials; 2009.
46. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural sources for concrete. IS:383 New Delhi India; 1970
47. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Indian Standard concrete mix proportioning–guidelines. IS:10262 New Delhi; 2009
48. 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.04010.1016/j.istruc.2020.03.040 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jobe.2017.11.02410.1016/j.jobe.2017.11.024 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.19910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.199 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.10410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.104 ↗
52. Mishra A, Pandey A, Maheshwari P, et al. Green cement for sustainable concrete using marble dust. Int J ChemTech Res. 2013;5:616–622.
53. Dhoka MC. Green concrete: using industrial waste of marble powder, quarry dust and paper pulp. Int J Eng Sci Invent. 2013;2:67–70.
54. 10.1016/j.hbrcj.2012.10.00510.1016/j.hbrcj.2012.10.005 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.037 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.002 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.03610.1016/j.matdes.2010.03.036 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.02010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.020 ↗
59. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement. IS:1786 New Delhi; 2008
60. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete. IS:1199 New Delhi; 1959
61. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). Method of tests for strength of concrete. IS:516 New Delhi; 1959
62. C900 A. Standard test method for pullout strength of hardened concrete. 2013. American Society for Testing and Materials West Conshohocken USA
63. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.04610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.046 ↗
64. 10.1007/s12221-019-1028-910.1007/s12221-019-1028-9 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jestch.2019.01.00310.1016/j.jestch.2019.01.003 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.10297810.1016/j.firesaf.2020.102978 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.01010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.010 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.07110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.071 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.002 ↗
70. 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00491-410.1016/S0008-8846(01)00491-4 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13116910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131169 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11838710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118387 ↗
73. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000094810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000948 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0058110.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00581 ↗
75. American Concrete Institute (ACI). Bond and development of straight reinforcing bars in tension.” ACI 408-R03 Farmington Hills MI; 2003
76. UBC Library Open Collections. Bond behaviour of fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) rebars in concrete; 2010. Available from: https://open.library.ubc.ca/soa/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0062633
77. 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.03910.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.039 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.istruc.2015.11.00510.1016/j.istruc.2015.11.005 ↗