journal article·2023-11-02

The tailoring of interfacial adhesion and its effects on material properties for carbon-fiber reinforced polymeric composites

Luke ElKhoury, John C. Berg

Publisher page

Abstract

Carbon fiber reinforced polymeric composites have long been of interest owing to their remarkable properties of high strength, toughness, and low weight. Part of their appeal comes from their customizability to fulfil a large number of applications. Controlling the degree of interfacial adhesion between fibers and polymeric matrix is one of the important ways of optimizing composite properties for desired applications. The present study examines a simple technique for modulating adhesion, its measurement using single-fiber fragmentation, and its effects on the tensile, flexural, and impact properties of the corresponding fiber tow composites. Adhesion was modified by coating untreated Hexcel IM7 fibers to various levels with room temperature ‘vulcanizing’ silicone dissolved in the mixed alkane solvent IsoparTM L. The matrix polymer was Epon862 with an Epikure curing agent W. Fiber tows consisted of 12k fibers, and were tensile, 3-point bend and ‘charpy’ impact tested to evaluate their mechanical properties. Interfacial adhesion was reduced from 101 MPa to near zero, while impact toughness was more than doubled. The tensile modulus decreased only up to 25%, while the flexural modulus decreased by approximately 50%. Ultimate flexural strength and flexural modulus decreased. Energy to failure had no meaningful changes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Funding

Materials Sciences Corp.

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0014-3057(96)00051-110.1016/S0014-3057(96)00051-1 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.10010.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.100 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.06410.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.064 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.06.02510.1016/j.compscitech.2018.06.025 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.003 ↗
6. 10.1177/07316844990180110510.1177/073168449901801105 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.dental.2003.12.00110.1016/j.dental.2003.12.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.03510.1016/j.compscitech.2014.05.035 ↗
9. 10.1016/0266-3538(92)90055-810.1016/0266-3538(92)90055-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00105-010.1016/S0266-3538(99)00105-0 ↗
11. 10.1016/0010-4361(90)90424-U10.1016/0010-4361(90)90424-U ↗
12. Jensen RE McKnight SH Flanagan DP et al. Hybrid fiber sizings for enhanced energy absorption in glass-reinforced composites. Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground MD; 2004 July 1 [cited 2022 Mar 3]. Available from: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA425481.
13. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00166-910.1016/S0266-3538(99)00166-9 ↗
14. 10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V ↗
15. 10.1016/S0032-3861(01)00246-410.1016/S0032-3861(01)00246-4 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.75012010810.1002/pc.750120108 ↗
17. Carrillo-Baeza JG, Cantwell WJ, Gamboa-Castellanos RA. Advantages of low energy adhesion PP for ballistics. IntechOpen, London, UK; 2012.
18. 10.1021/am404394g10.1021/am404394g ↗
19. 10.1163/016942410X50764110.1163/016942410X507641 ↗
20. 10.1163/016942409X1252674338780910.1163/016942409X12526743387809 ↗
21. 10.1163/15685610778231361010.1163/156856107782313610 ↗
22. 10.1163/156856104232325710.1163/1568561042323257 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.diamond.2014.11.00210.1016/j.diamond.2014.11.002 ↗
24. 10.1039/C4RA11878B10.1039/C4RA11878B ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10662810.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106628 ↗
26. 10.1163/15685540030018426210.1163/156855400300184262 ↗
27. Koolen G, Soete J, van Vuure AW. Interface modification and the influence on damage development of flax fibre – epoxy composites when subjected to hygroscopic cycling. Mater Today. 2020;31:S273–S279.
28. 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.02.02410.1016/j.jiec.2017.02.024 ↗
29. 10.1002/app.1327710.1002/app.13277 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00039-110.1016/S0266-3538(99)00039-1 ↗
31. 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90127-310.1016/0266-3538(93)90127-3 ↗
32. 10.1002/pen.76028090510.1002/pen.760280905 ↗
33. 10.1163/156855494X0009410.1163/156855494X00094 ↗
34. 10.1016/0015-0568(77)90025-210.1016/0015-0568(77)90025-2 ↗
35. 10.1002/app.2687510.1002/app.26875 ↗
36. 10.1007/978-1-4899-0342-610.1007/978-1-4899-0342-6 ↗
37. Arkles B. Silane coupling agents: connecting across boundaries (3rd edition) [cited 2021 August 10]. Available from: https://www.gelest.com/themencode-pdf-viewer/?file=https://www.gelest.com/wp-content/uploads/Goods-PDF-brochures-couplingagents.pdf 2014.
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.06910.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.069 ↗
39. Rich MJ Drzal LT Hunston DL et al. Round Robin assessment of the single fiber fragmentation test; 2002 [cited 2021 May 17). Available from: https://www.nist.gov/publications/round-robin-assessment-single-fiber-fragmentation-test.
40. 10.1177/0021998321106046710.1177/00219983211060467 ↗
41. Carbon Fiber DataSheet | Hexcel; 2021 [cited 2021 Feb 11]. Available from: https://www.hexcel.com/Resources/DataSheets/Carbon-Fiber.
42. Nelson WB. Weibull distribution. In Applied life data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ; 2003. p. 36–43.
43. Feih S Wonsyld K Minzari D et al. Testing procedure for the single fiber fragmentation test. Risø National Laboratory; 2004 [cited 2021 Feb 5]. Available from: https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/testing-procedure-for-the-single-fiber-fragmentation-test.
44. 10.1201/978131513669110.1201/9781315136691 ↗
45. 10.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-910.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9 ↗
46. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)00069-710.1016/0266-3538(94)00069-7 ↗
47. 10.1002/app.1978.07022111510.1002/app.1978.070221115 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10838410.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108384 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00015-810.1016/S0266-3538(97)00015-8 ↗
50. 10.1177/07316840177267901110.1177/073168401772679011 ↗
51. Cilley E, Roylance D, Schneider N. Methods of fiber and void measurement in graphite/epoxy composites. In C.A. Berg, F.C. McGarry, S.Y. Elliot (Eds): Composite materials: testing and design. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. 1974, p. 237–249.
52. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.02.03110.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.02.031 ↗
53. 10.1016/0040-6031(95)02606-110.1016/0040-6031(95)02606-1 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.024 ↗
55. EPIKURE W curing agent | Aromatic amine curing agent | Hexion. Miller-Stephenson Chemicals; 2016 [cited 2021 April 22]. Available from: https://miller-stephenson.com/product/epikure-w/.
56. Standard test method for impact testing of miniaturized Charpy V-notch specimens; 2018 [cited 2022 Sep 13]. Available from: https://www.astm.org/e2248-18.html.
57. ASTM D4018-17 standard test methods for properties of continuous filament carbon and graphite fiber tows; 2017 [cited 2022 Aug 9]. https://www.astm.org/d4018-17.html.
58. ASTM D7264/D7264M-21 standard test method for flexural properties of polymer matrix composite materials; 2021 [cited 2022 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www.astm.org/Standards/D7264.htm.
59. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11479710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114797 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11409210.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114092 ↗
61. 10.1007/s12221-022-4138-810.1007/s12221-022-4138-8 ↗
62. 10.1002/1097-4628(20001031)78:5<962::AID-APP40>3.0.CO;2-510.1002/1097-4628(20001031)78:5<962::AID-APP40>3.0.CO;2-5 ↗
63. 10.1177/002199830203601524310.1177/0021998302036015243 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2012.08.019 ↗
65. 10.1023/A:101968431227210.1023/A:1019684312272 ↗
66. 10.1088/0965-0393/16/5/05500910.1088/0965-0393/16/5/055009 ↗
67. 10.1007/s11709-015-0316-810.1007/s11709-015-0316-8 ↗
68. Zhuang L. Fiber/matrix interface crack propagation in polymeric unidirectional composite. Luleå University of Technology Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics Material Science; 2016 [cited 2022 Aug 2]. Luleå Sweden. Available from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-17391.
69. 10.1007/BF0115123410.1007/BF01151234 ↗
70. 10.1080/01694243.2015.102212610.1080/01694243.2015.1022126 ↗