journal article·2024-12-16

Effects of surface roughness parameters on the shear strength of AA 6061-T6 aluminium alloy in structural adhesive bonding applications

Mani Mohan Tiwari, Saleema Noormohammed, Dilip Kumar Sarkar, X.-Grant Chen

Publisher page

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of the surface roughness of an aluminium substrate on the adhesive joint strength of aluminium–aluminium specimens prepared using epoxy and methyl methacrylate adhesives for shear strength tests. Aluminium surfaces were mechanically abraded using silicon carbide (SiC) papers with different grit sizes in two different modes. The evaluated bonding performance characteristics included the maximum bonding strength and residual strength of the adhesive joints after their exposure to various environmental conditions. The results demonstrated that excellent adhesion characteristics were obtained at the optimum SiC grit size (grit-80) regardless of the adhesive type. In addition, the topographical and morphological properties of the aluminium surfaces were studied before and after mechanical abrasion via surface profilometry and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. A possible mechanism was proposed to explain the observed shear strength changes and respective modes of fracture after sample exposure to air, de-ionised water, and aqueous salt solutions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Material Selection and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Science, Aluminium Research Centre REGAL, University of Quebec at Chicoutimi, Chicoutimi, Canada

Trans-Al, Inc., Chicoutimi, Canada

Funding

Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(21)10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(21) ↗
2. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.00410.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004 ↗
3. 10.1016/B978-0-12-819140-8.00008-010.1016/B978-0-12-819140-8.00008-0 ↗
4. 10.4236/gep.2014.2201610.4236/gep.2014.22016 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00006-310.1016/S0143-7496(00)00006-3 ↗
6. Shields J. Adhesives handbook. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2013.
7. 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00070-x10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00070-x ↗
8. 10.1007/s42247-023-00478-z10.1007/s42247-023-00478-z ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11549010.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115490 ↗
10. Noury P, Hayman B, McGeorge D, et al. Lightweight construction for advanced shipbuilding-recent development. Proceedings of the 37th WEGEMT Summer School; 2002. p. 11–15.
11. 10.1002/smll.20130394710.1002/smll.201303947 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00361-110.1016/S0924-0136(99)00361-1 ↗
13. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.765.76610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.765.766 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10300510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103005 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.03.00310.1016/j.paerosci.2014.03.003 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0324673010.1007/BF03246730 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.01.001 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0143-7496(01)00049-510.1016/S0143-7496(01)00049-5 ↗
19. 10.3390/met1006073010.3390/met10060730 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00061-X10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00061-X ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.07.02710.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.07.027 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10776510.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107765 ↗
23. 10.1361/105996306X12434710.1361/105996306X124347 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.11.01210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.11.012 ↗
25. Teng J-G, Fernando D, Yu T, et al., editors. Treatment of steel surfaces for effective adhesive bonding. Advances in FRP composites in civil engineering. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering (CICE 2010); 2010 Sept 27–29; Beijing, China. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011.
26. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12807210.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.128072 ↗
27. 10.21062/ujep/x.2010/a/1213-2489/MT/10/1/4910.21062/ujep/x.2010/a/1213-2489/MT/10/1/49 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10747810.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107478 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000038710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000387 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00044-010.1016/S0143-7496(00)00044-0 ↗
31. 10.1163/156856187X0029210.1163/156856187X00292 ↗
32. Slătineanu L, Potârniche Ş, Coteaţă M, et al. Surface roughness at aluminium parts sand blasting. Proc Manuf Syst. 2011;6:69–74.
33. 10.36297/vw.applsci.v2i2.3810.36297/vw.applsci.v2i2.38 ↗
34. 10.1590/1679-7825306610.1590/1679-78253066 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.01210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.02.012 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.acme.2013.02.00510.1016/j.acme.2013.02.005 ↗
37. 10.1007/BF0105810310.1007/BF01058103 ↗
38. 10.5772/6059910.5772/60599 ↗
39. 10.36297/vw.applsci.v2i1.3710.36297/vw.applsci.v2i1.37 ↗
40. D1002-10. Standard test method for apparent shear strength of single-lap-joint adhesively bonded metal specimens by tension loading (metal-to-metal). West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2010.
41. Standard PNEN. ISO 10365:2022, Adhesives-designation of main failure patterns. Warszawa: ISO; 2022.
42. 10.3390/applnano203001510.3390/applnano2030015 ↗
43. 10.1016/S1003-6326(19)65091-010.1016/S1003-6326(19)65091-0 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.10.04110.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.10.041 ↗
45. 10.1007/s12540-015-5426-210.1007/s12540-015-5426-2 ↗
46. 10.1016/B978-0-323-22805-3.00006-210.1016/B978-0-323-22805-3.00006-2 ↗
47. 10.1021/la302260a10.1021/la302260a ↗
48. 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01406.x10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01406.x ↗
49. 10.1155/2013/86907510.1155/2013/869075 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.05.08210.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.05.082 ↗
51. 10.1080/00218464.2021.189636210.1080/00218464.2021.1896362 ↗
52. 10.1080/01694243.2012.74773010.1080/01694243.2012.747730 ↗