Mechanical characterization of PEEK-CF/PEEK sandwich structures prepared via a combination of fused filament fabrication and epoxy post-bonding
Source abstract
Abstract
Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) and carbon-fiber-reinforced PEEK (PEEK-CF) are examples of engineering thermoplastics with exceptional mechanical properties. In the context of Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), the interlayer bonding between PEEK and PEEK-CF has a significant impact on the mechanical properties of printed components. Epoxy resin is used to enhance the interfacial bonding between PEEK and PEEK-CF due to its remarkable adhesive properties, while preserving the dimensional and weight attributes of the bonded sandwich structure. The application of epoxy resin as a post-processing technique enables the creation of intricate geometric designs within the bonded sandwich structures. This study presents a straightforward technique for producing sandwich structures using PEEK and PEEK-CF, followed by improving their mechanical properties through isothermal annealing. We conduct systematic single-factor experiments to explore the mechanical advantages of FFF-printed PEEK and PEEK-CF via three-point bending tests on individually printed monolithic specimens. Furthermore, mono-material specimens are bonded using epoxy resin to form dual-material bending specimens. Our findings reveal an optimal sequence: after isothermal annealing, mono-material specimens bonded with epoxy resin exhibit superior flexural strength and modulus. In addition, an in-depth examination of the meso-structure and fracture morphology of FFF-printed sandwich structures after bonding and heat treatment reveals insights into toughening and reinforcement mechanisms. This analysis is complemented by corresponding finite element simulations to validate the results. Notably, our research highlights the successful optimization of interlayer structures, facilitating the creation of sandwich structures with superior mechanical performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Photopolymerization techniques and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
Houston International Institute, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, Liaoning, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · Department of Education of Liaoning Province · Dalian Human Resources and Social Security Bureau
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Solomon IJ, Sevvel P, Gunasekaran J. A review on the various processing parameters in FDM. Mater Today: Proc. 2021;37:509–514.
2. 10.1080/10426914.2021.194419310.1080/10426914.2021.1944193 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10165810.1016/j.addma.2020.101658 ↗
4. 10.1080/01694243.2021.192202210.1080/01694243.2021.1922022 ↗
5. Di AL, Di SP, Dolatnezhadsomarin A, et al. A reliable build orientation optimization method in additive manufacturing: the application to FDM technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;108(1-2):263–276.
6. Sathish Kumar K, Soundararajan R, Shanthosh G, et al. Augmenting effect of infill density and annealing on mechanical properties of PETG and CFPETG composites fabricated by FDM. Mater Today: Proc. 2021;45:2186–2191.
7. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10081910.1016/j.addma.2019.100819 ↗
8. 10.1080/01694243.2016.126841410.1080/01694243.2016.1268414 ↗
9. Ramya A, Vanapalli SL. 3D printing technologies in various applications. Int J Mech Eng Technol. 2016;7(3):396–409.
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.01210.1016/j.addma.2016.05.012 ↗
11. 10.3390/polym1318310110.3390/polym13183101 ↗
12. 10.5301/jabfm.500034310.5301/jabfm.5000343 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.05110.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.051 ↗
14. 10.3390/jmmp402003810.3390/jmmp4020038 ↗
15. 10.1080/01694243.2023.222849610.1080/01694243.2023.2228496 ↗
16. 10.1080/01694243.2022.212119510.1080/01694243.2022.2121195 ↗
17. 10.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.610.5577/intdentres.2018.vol8.no2.6 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma809527110.3390/ma8095271 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.11172610.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111726 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.009 ↗
21. Skirbutis G, Dzingutė A, Masiliūnaitė V, et al. A review of PEEK polymer’s properties and its use in prosthodontics. Stomatologija. 2018;20(2):54–58.
22. 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.02710.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.027 ↗
23. 10.3390/polym1409163310.3390/polym14091633 ↗
24. 10.3390/jcm802024010.3390/jcm8020240 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.12448510.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.124485 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10636410.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106364 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.10167410.1016/j.jcot.2021.101674 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.04010.1016/j.cja.2020.05.040 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.04010.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.040 ↗
30. 10.1088/2053-1591/abeec810.1088/2053-1591/abeec8 ↗
31. 10.1177/0954008321100365410.1177/09540083211003654 ↗
32. 10.1002/mame.20180016910.1002/mame.201800169 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11690110.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116901 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00170-021-08127-710.1007/s00170-021-08127-7 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10136510.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101365 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.procir.2023.06.12110.1016/j.procir.2023.06.121 ↗
37. Yu X, Song W, Zheng J, et al. Effects of low-pressure annealing on the performance of 3D printed CF/PEEK composites. Chin J Mech Eng Addit Manuf Front. 2023;2(2):100076.
38. Wang Z, Yin X, Wang L. An experimental investigation on the tensile properties of PEEK-PEI sandwich structures prepared via fused filament fabrication. High Perform Polym. 2023;35(3):276–294.10.1177/09540083221126623 ↗
39. 10.3390/polym1419406610.3390/polym14194066 ↗
40. Standard A. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. ASTM International West Conshohocken(PA). 2010. doi: 10.1520/D0790-10.10.1520/D0790-10 ↗
41. 10.1007/s40436-018-0237-610.1007/s40436-018-0237-6 ↗
42. 10.1007/s12206-021-0708-810.1007/s12206-021-0708-8 ↗
43. 10.1088/1742-6596/2338/1/01204710.1088/1742-6596/2338/1/012047 ↗
44. 10.1080/15376494.2020.171262810.1080/15376494.2020.1712628 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.11.03210.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.11.032 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11381910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113819 ↗
47. 10.3390/jfb1408042910.3390/jfb14080429 ↗
48. Wang Z. Numerical determination of elastic and viscoelastic properties of aligned continuous and discontinuous fiber reinforced composites; 2016.