Enhancement of tensile and flexural strengths of carbon/ramie/epoxy hybrid composites using surface treatment technique: an experimental and artificial neural network study
Source abstract
Abstract
This study examines the influence of sodium hydroxide treatment on the tensile and flexural properties of carbon/ramie/epoxy hybrid composites, validated through artificial neural network modeling. Among untreated, 1 wt.%, and 5 wt.% sodium hydroxide-treated samples, the 3 wt.% treatment showed the highest improvements, achieving a tensile strength of 524 MPa and a flexural strength of 697 MPa, with respective increases of 27.48% and 43.75%. 1 wt.%, 3 wt.%, and 5 wt.% of sodium hydroxide degraded the ramie fibers, causing weight losses of 4.6%, 8.5%, and 18.5%, respectively. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy confirmed the removal of surface impurities such as wax, hemicellulose, and lignin, enhancing the bonding between the fibers and the matrix, while field emission scanning electron microscopy revealed improved structural integrity. The superior properties of the 3 wt.% sodium hydroxide-treated composite were attributed to a stronger interface between the fibers and the matrix. Additionally, the artificial neural network model accurately predicted the tensile and flexural strengths using time, load, and extension as inputs, with regression coefficients of 0.99998 and 0.99982 and a minimal error of 3.29%. These results highlight the optimal performance of 3 wt.% sodium hydroxide-treated composites as sustainable materials for structural applications in the automotive, aerospace, and construction sectors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Bamboo properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Design and Automation, School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT)
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1177/0967391121102060910.1177/09673911211020609 ↗
2. 10.1080/01694243.2023.226126310.1080/01694243.2023.2261263 ↗
3. 10.1080/01694243.2018.154352810.1080/01694243.2018.1543528 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2888010.1002/pc.28880 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10751-024-01946-610.1007/s10751-024-01946-6 ↗
6. 10.5276/jswtm/iswmaw/503/2024.53210.5276/jswtm/iswmaw/503/2024.532 ↗
7. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.984-985.25710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.984-985.257 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2602410.1002/pc.26024 ↗
9. 10.1080/09276440.2023.222050010.1080/09276440.2023.2220500 ↗
10. 10.1002/pen.2674610.1002/pen.26746 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.40810.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.408 ↗
12. 10.1002/pls2.1012810.1002/pls2.10128 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10751-024-02109-310.1007/s10751-024-02109-3 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.13210.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.132 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.06610.1016/j.jmrt.2024.10.066 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10751-024-01978-y10.1007/s10751-024-01978-y ↗
17. 10.1080/03602559.2010.55138110.1080/03602559.2010.551381 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.5377410.1002/app.53774 ↗
19. Jamilah UL, Sujito S. The improvement of ramie fiber properties as composite materials using alkalization treatment: naOH concentration. Indones J Mater Sci. 2021;22:488173.
20. 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-310.1007/s10924-006-0042-3 ↗
21. 10.1080/01694243.2022.206691510.1080/01694243.2022.2066915 ↗
22. 10.1080/01694243.2024.236229710.1080/01694243.2024.2362297 ↗
23. 10.1163/156856198X0025410.1163/156856198X00254 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.79710.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.797 ↗
25. 10.1163/016942410X50762310.1163/016942410X507623 ↗
26. 10.1080/01694243.2012.69736310.1080/01694243.2012.697363 ↗
27. 10.1080/09276440.2016.118455610.1080/09276440.2016.1184556 ↗
28. 10.1163/156856195X0083310.1163/156856195X00833 ↗
29. 10.1163/15685610677902442710.1163/156856106779024427 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.06110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.061 ↗
31. 10.1080/01694243.2021.202531010.1080/01694243.2021.2025310 ↗
32. 10.1080/01694243.2021.191120510.1080/01694243.2021.1911205 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10654910.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106549 ↗
34. 10.1163/016942410X50764110.1163/016942410X507641 ↗
35. Deng Y, Li X, Hu X, et al. Low-velocity impact behavior of interlayer hybrid foldcore sandwich structures with carbon/glass fibers. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2023:1–44.
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.02210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.022 ↗
37. 10.1080/01694243.2015.108905910.1080/01694243.2015.1089059 ↗
38. 10.1163/15685610332211290510.1163/156856103322112905 ↗
39. 10.1080/15376494.2023.217970510.1080/15376494.2023.2179705 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.07410.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.074 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.07910.1016/j.jmrt.2020.07.079 ↗
42. Ameur MB Mahi AE Rebiere J et al. Experimental fatigue behavior of carbon/flax hybrid composites under tensile loading To cite this version: HAL Id: hal-02954676 Experimental fatigue behavior of carbon/flax hybrid composites under tensile loading; 2024.
43. 10.31224/osf.io/n68j910.31224/osf.io/n68j9 ↗
44. 10.1088/1757-899X/628/1/01201110.1088/1757-899X/628/1/012011 ↗
45. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab54e710.1088/2053-1591/ab54e7 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.10028410.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100284 ↗
47. 10.12693/APhysPolA.130.44410.12693/APhysPolA.130.444 ↗
48. 10.1080/01694243.2024.240368010.1080/01694243.2024.2403680 ↗
49. Altabey WA, Noori M. Fatigue life prediction for carbon fibre/epoxy laminate composites under spectrum loading using two different neural network architectures. Int J Sustain Mater Struct Syst. 2017;3:53–78.
50. 10.1080/01694243.2024.242242610.1080/01694243.2024.2422426 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.35610.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.356 ↗
52. 10.1080/15440478.2021.195843210.1080/15440478.2021.1958432 ↗
53. 10.1007/s13399-023-04628-510.1007/s13399-023-04628-5 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.56510.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.565 ↗
55. 10.1063/5.022360410.1063/5.0223604 ↗
56. 10.1155/2021/583586710.1155/2021/5835867 ↗
57. 10.1002/pc.2646010.1002/pc.26460 ↗
58. 10.1080/15440478.2023.223408010.1080/15440478.2023.2234080 ↗
59. 10.1080/01694243.2021.200206610.1080/01694243.2021.2002066 ↗
60. 10.1080/01694243.2024.232281210.1080/01694243.2024.2322812 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.02710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.027 ↗
62. 10.1177/073168441245998210.1177/0731684412459982 ↗
63. 10.1002/pc.2683510.1002/pc.26835 ↗
64. 10.1002/pc.2481710.1002/pc.24817 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.03.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2013.03.012 ↗
66. 10.1080/01694243.2024.242242610.1080/01694243.2024.2422426 ↗