journal article·2014-05-19

Analysis of composite single lap joints using numerical and experimental approach

R.L. Vijaya kumar, M.R. Bhat, C.R.L. Murthy

Publisher page

Abstract

Adhesives are widely used to execute the assembly of aerospace and automotive structures due to their ability to join dissimilar materials, reduced stress concentration, and improved fatigue resistance. The mechanical behavior of adhesive joints can be studied either using analytical models or by conducting mechanical tests. However, the complexity owing to multiple interfaces, layers with different properties, material and geometric nonlinearity and its three-dimensional nature combine to increase the difficulty in obtaining an overall system of governing equations to predict the joint behavior. On the other hand, experiments are often time consuming and expensive due to a number of parameters involved. Finite element analysis (FEA) is profoundly used in recent years to overcome these limitations. The work presented in this paper involves the finite element modeling and analysis of a composite single lap joint where the adhesive–adherend interface region was modeled using connector elements. The computed stresses were compared with the experimental stresses obtained using digital image correlation technique. The results showed an agreement. Further, the failure load predicted using FEA was found to be closer to the actual failure load obtained by mechanical tests.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang ZY · Compos. Struct · 2009 · 89 · 58910.1016/j.compstruct.2008.11.002 ↗
2. Guo Shu · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes · 2006 · 26 · 62910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2005.09.005 ↗
3. Volkersen O · Luftfahrtforschung · 1938 · 15 · 41
4. Goland M · J. Appl. Mech · 1944 · 66 · A1710.1115/1.4009336 ↗
5. Hart-Smith LJ. Analysis and design of advanced composite bonded joints. NASA contract report NASA TR-11234. Palm Springs: McDonnell Douglas Corporation; 1974.
6. Pickett AK · Compos. Struct · 1985 · 3 · 5510.1016/0263-8223(85)90028-5 ↗
7. Pickett AK · Compos. Struct · 1985 · 4 · 13510.1016/0263-8223(85)90003-0 ↗
8. Odi RA · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes · 2004 · 24 · 38910.1016/j.ijadhadh.2001.06.001 ↗
9. Tsai MY · J. Compos. Mater · 1995 · 29 · 1154
10. Li G · Compos. Struct · 1999 · 46 · 39510.1016/S0263-8223(99)00106-3 ↗
11. Harris JA · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes · 1984 · 4 · 6510.1016/0143-7496(84)90103-9 ↗
12. 10.1080/0021846860807323810.1080/00218468608073238 ↗
13. Crocombe AD · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes · 1990 · 10 · 16710.1016/0143-7496(90)90100-C ↗
14. Adams RD · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes · 1987 · 7 · 6910.1016/0143-7496(87)90092-3 ↗
15. Bogy DB · J. Appl. Mech · 1968 · 35 · 46010.1115/1.3601236 ↗
16. Towse A · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes · 1999 · 19 · 7110.1016/S0143-7496(98)00058-X ↗
17. Mackerle J · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng · 1997 · 5 · 15910.1088/0965-0393/5/2/006 ↗
18. Mackerle J · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng · 2002 · 10 · 63710.1088/0965-0393/10/6/304 ↗
19. Baldan A · J. Mat. Sci. · 2004 · 39 · 110.1023/B:JMSC.0000007726.58758.e4 ↗
20. Baldan A · J. Mat. Sci. · 2004 · 39 · 472910.1023/B:JMSC.0000035317.87118.ab ↗
21. Banea MD · J. Mater. Des. Appl · 2009 · 223 · 1
22. Vijaya Kumar RL · Ultrasonics · 2013 · 53 · 115010.1016/j.ultras.2013.01.014 ↗
23. American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM D 2093-03. Standard test method for preparation of surfaces of plastics prior to adhesive bonding. Vol. 15.06. Annual book of ASTM standards; 2004. p. 1–3.
24. Grant LDR · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes · 2009 · 29 · 40510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.09.001 ↗
25. Diaz J · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes · 2010 · 30 · 17810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.12.005 ↗
26. You M · Int. J. Adhes. Adhesives · 2008 · 28 · 7110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.06.001 ↗
27. Pereira AM · J. Mater. Process. Technol · 2010 · 210 · 61010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.11.006 ↗
28. 10.1163/15685610677902443610.1163/156856106779024436 ↗
29. da Silva LFM · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes · 2007 · 27 · 21610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.04.002 ↗
30. da Silva LFM · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes · 2007 · 27 · 36210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.007 ↗
31. Malvade I · Comput. Mater. Sci · 2009 · 44 · 120810.1016/j.commatsci.2008.08.002 ↗
32. Baltazar A · J. Acoust. Soc. Am · 2003 · 114 · 142410.1121/1.1600723 ↗
33. Rispler AR · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes · 2000 · 20 · 22110.1016/S0143-7496(99)00047-0 ↗
34. Tsai MY · Compos. Struct · 1995 · 32 · 12310.1016/0263-8223(95)00059-3 ↗
35. Frostig Y · J. Eng. Mech. · 1999 · 125 · 129810.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:11(1298) ↗
36. Sutton MA · 2009
37. Ruiz PD · J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des · 2006 · 41 · 58310.1243/03093247JSA180 ↗
38. Cognard JY · European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering ECCOMAS · 2004 · 24
39. Feraboli P · Composites Part A. · 2010 · 41 · 55710.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.003 ↗
40. Vijaya kumar RL · Int. J. Adhes. Adhes · 2013 · 42 · 6010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.01.004 ↗
41. Chuan Her S · Compos. Struct · 1999 · 47 · 67310.1016/S0263-8223(00)00052-0 ↗