Influence of voltage modes on microstructure and corrosion resistance of micro-arc oxidation coating on magnesium alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Micro-arc oxidation (MAO) technology, as an efficient and widely used technology, can fabricate a ceramic film on magnesium (Mg) alloys in situ to significantly improve corrosion resistance. The study aims to investigate the effect of voltage modes on the preparation and performance of MAO coating on Mg alloys. The scanning electron microscope, X-ray diffractometer, potential dynamic polarization, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements were applied for characterizing the microstructure, composition, and corrosion resistance of the MAO film, respectively. The results revealed that employed 300/350 V step-up mode, the MAO film showed a more uniform distribution of surface micro-pores, fewer micro-cracks and denser inner layer, lower corrosion current density (1.871 × 10−3 mA·cm−2), and higher electrochemical impedance value, compared to other voltage treated parameters. Therefore, it could be concluded that the step-up voltage parameters are conducive to the optimization of microstructure, improvement of corrosion resistance of MAO coating, and reduction of the energy consumption during processing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Hydrogen Energy, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong, China
Institute of Medicine and Health, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
Institute of Advanced Wear and Corrosion Resistant and Functional Materials, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Funding
Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/advs.20190244310.1002/advs.201902443 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.11982910.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119829 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.01110.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.011 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1003-6326(21)65728-X10.1016/S1003-6326(21)65728-X ↗
5. 10.1080/01694243.2016.117156910.1080/01694243.2016.1171569 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.08.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.08.002 ↗
7. Polo TB · Sci Rep · 2020 · 10 · 110.1038/s41598-019-56847-4 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.03710.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.037 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.12642710.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126427 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.03010.1016/j.actbio.2018.08.030 ↗
11. Xu W, Liu Z, Li B, et al. Effects of magnetic field force in preparation of plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings: a novel method to improve the corrosion resistance of magnesium. Mater Today Commun. 2021;906(13):162642.10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162642 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10164210.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101642 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.corsci.2021.10994110.1016/j.corsci.2021.109941 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10073510.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100735 ↗
15. Sampatirao H · Mater Today Proc · 2021 · 461 · 141
16. 10.1007/s12613-021-2377-010.1007/s12613-021-2377-0 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11998-011-9357-710.1007/s11998-011-9357-7 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.06910.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.069 ↗
19. 10.1007/s40195-018-0845-y10.1007/s40195-018-0845-y ↗
20. 10.1007/s11665-017-3088-610.1007/s11665-017-3088-6 ↗
21. 10.1149/2.0531807jes10.1149/2.0531807jes ↗
22. 10.1088/1742-6596/1115/3/03207410.1088/1742-6596/1115/3/032074 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.12910.1016/j.msec.2016.12.129 ↗
24. 10.1088/2053-1591/ac0b9c10.1088/2053-1591/ac0b9c ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.11.01410.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.11.014 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10887610.1016/j.corsci.2020.108876 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.14610.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.146 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.06.00310.1016/j.corsci.2010.06.003 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jma.2017.02.00410.1016/j.jma.2017.02.004 ↗
30. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.575-576.47210.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.575-576.472 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.10.07910.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.10.079 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.06.05910.1016/j.jallcom.2011.06.059 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.04210.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.042 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.12.00510.1016/j.corsci.2018.12.005 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.02.02110.1016/j.electacta.2007.02.021 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.11.00810.1016/j.apsusc.2008.11.008 ↗