The effect of self-healing process on the strength increase in clay
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the effect of an additive with nano-montmorillonite brand on the process of self-healing on clay soil was considered. Laboratory tests include Atterberg limits and unpressurized compressive strength on the natural soil and soil samples contain different weight percentages of the additive. The results reveal that the addition of the additive up to 5% of the soil dry weight led to significant changes in the physical and mechanical properties of improved soil such as increasing plasticity index, increasing compressive strength and consequently, increasing the self-healing on clay soil. These changes are functions of the weight percent of the additive and the age of the samples. Moreover, laboratory results were investigated by SEM and FESEM images. Data was collected from uniaxial test and Scanning Electron Microscope images indicate that the maximum amount of self-healing occurred in the samples with 5% nano-clay on the sixtieth day after the initial failure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microbial Applications in Construction Materials · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Mazandaran Institute of Technology, Babol, Iran
Department of Civil Engineering, Babol University of Technology, Babol, Iran
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.03.01810.1016/j.enggeo.2013.03.018 ↗
2. Kalantari F · 8th International Congress on Civil Engineering · 2009
3. 10.1016/j.pce.2006.04.02610.1016/j.pce.2006.04.026 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.11.00910.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.11.009 ↗
5. 10.1680/gein.8.020310.1680/gein.8.0203 ↗
6. Daniel DE · Proc Geosynthetics 93, IFAI · 1993 · 3 · 1483
7. Vaughan PR · Geotech Eng Div, ASCE · 1982 · 108 · 1710.1061/AJGEB6.0001233 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:12(1621)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:12(1621) ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:3(266)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:3(266) ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:3(267)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:3(267) ↗
11. 10.1139/t02-11010.1139/t02-110 ↗
12. 10.1520/GTJ1085010.1520/GTJ10850 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:7(890)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:7(890) ↗
14. 10.1346/CCMN10.1346/CCMN ↗
15. 10.1016/S0013-7952(03)00105-410.1016/S0013-7952(03)00105-4 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:3(265)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:3(265) ↗
17. Naderinia B · 2009
18. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.07.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2007.07.001 ↗
19. 10.1038/nmat209910.1038/nmat2099 ↗
20. Azzam WR · GEOMATE · 2014 · 7 · 927
21. Feynman R · Eng Sci · 1960 · 23 · 22
22. Rana AK · Recent Trends Eng · 2009 · 1 · 46
23. 10.1007/s11051-012-1190-010.1007/s11051-012-1190-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.acme.2017.01.01010.1016/j.acme.2017.01.010 ↗
25. Sekhavatiyan A · 5th National Congress on Civil Engineering · 2010
26. Majeed ZH · Asian Sci Res · 2012 · 2 · 587
27. Majeed ZH · Basic Appl Sci · 2013 · 7 · 576
28. 10.1016/S0927-7757(97)00127-110.1016/S0927-7757(97)00127-1 ↗
29. Kollensperger G · Anal Bioanal Chem · 1999 · 363 · 323
30. Hawkes WP · 1998
31. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.08710.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.087 ↗