journal article·2013-02

Increasing single-lap joint strength by adherend curvature-induced residual stresses

Ş. Temiz, S. Akpinar, M.D. Aydın, E. Sancaktar

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Single-lap joint (SLJ) geometry is the most widely used type of adhesive joint geometry. In this joint, peel stresses occur at the overlap ends due to load eccentricity and the presence of shear-free adhesive termination surfaces. These peel stresses, along with the transverse tensile stresses which occur along the overlap longitudinal axes, and adhesive shear stresses, ultimately cause joint failure. Obviously, reductions in these stresses should result in higher joint strength and increased load capacity. To this end, we exploited elastic spring-back capability of (steel) metal adherends by initially forming curved segments of varying arc lengths and radii at overlap ends. These adherends with curved-end sections were then bonded in single-lap configuration, simply by applying sufficient bonding pressure to elastically flatten the curved segments to result in typically flat overlap sections subsequent to adhesive cure and the removal of bonding pressure. Since the elastic adherend overlap ends tend to revert back to their initial curved form, they exert compressive residual stresses on the adhesive layer in the overlap end regions. We determined that the compressive residual stresses induced in this fashion considerably increased the load capacity of SLJs subjected to tension. Keywords: adhesivessingle-lap jointresidual stresstension
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Aydın MD · Mühendislik ve Makina · 2004 · 45 · 18
2. Apalak MK · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 1993 · 13 · 21910.1016/0143-7496(93)90025-5 ↗
3. Sancaktar E · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2003 · 17 · 65510.1163/156856103321340796 ↗
4. Sancaktar E · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2000 · 14 · 136310.1163/156856100742258 ↗
5. Sancaktar E · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2000 · 14 · 126510.1163/156856100742195 ↗
6. Sancaktar E · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 1999 · 13 · 23710.1163/156856199X00415 ↗
7. Sancaktar E · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 1995 · 9 · 11910.1163/156856195X01085 ↗
8. Sancaktar E · Journal of Adhesion · 1991 · 34 · 21110.1080/00218469108026515 ↗
9. Sancaktar E · Journal of Adhesion · 1980 · 11 · 23310.1080/00218468008078919 ↗
10. Tomblin JS · 2001
11. Adams RD · 198410.1007/978-94-009-5616-2 ↗
12. Andruet RH. Special 2-D and 3-D geometrically non-linear finite elements for analysis of adhesively bonded joints [PhD Thesis]. Blacksburg (VA): The Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg; 1998.
13. Akpinar S. Investigation of mechanical properties of adhesives exposed to shear [MSc Thesis]. Erzurum (Turkey): Mechanical Engineering, Atatürk University, Erzurum; 2008.
14. Hart-Smith LJ · 1973
15. Adams RD · 1997
16. Kinloch AJ · 1993
17. Temiz S · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2006 · 20 · 154710.1163/156856106778884262 ↗
18. Campilho RDSG · Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology · 2011 · 25 · 235110.1163/016942411X580081 ↗
19. Kumar S · International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives · 2009 · 29 · 78510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.06.006 ↗
20. Kumar S · Journal of Adhesion · 2010 · 86 · 36910.1080/00218461003704329 ↗