journal article·2006-06

Domain Complexion Diagrams Related to Mercury Intrusion‐Extrusion in Monte Carlo‐Simulated Porous Networks

Carlos Felipe, Salomón Cordero, Isaac Kornhauser, Giorgio Zgrablich, Raul López, Fernando Rojas

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Porous networks of sites (cavities) and bonds (throats) are simulated by a Monte Carlo procedure; the connectivity (C) being the mean number of bonds surrounding a site. For simulating Hg intrusion‐extrusion processes, canthotaxis at site‐bond joints and snap‐off of Hg threads are considered. Hg porosimetry is illustrated in terms of domain complexion diagrams (DCD), these being graphs that depict the sites and bonds of given sizes that are either Hg‐filled or not. DCD plots show that during Hg intrusion: (i) the capillary resistance to Hg access becomes smaller as C increases, the bond sizes get larger, and canthotaxis is absent; (ii) in highly pore size correlated networks, the Hg filling sequence of sites occurs from the larger to the smaller voids; (iii) in lowly pore size correlated networks, Hg intrusion occurs homogeneously with respect to the whole set of site sizes. During extrusion, Hg entrapment is more intense when: (i) C is low, (ii) the pore size correlation is small, and (iii) the snap‐off phenomenon is extensive. Hg extrusion DCD plots show that for high C: (i) Hg is trapped inside the largest sites if the pore size correlation is null or medium; and (ii) at higher pore size correlations, Hg is retained over a wide range of site sizes. For networks of low C, Hg is trapped over a wide variety of cavity sizes irrespective of the pore size correlation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRev.17.27310.1103/PhysRev.17.273 ↗
2. 10.1021/i560148a01310.1021/i560148a013 ↗
3. 10.1098/rstl.1805.000510.1098/rstl.1805.0005 ↗
4. 10.1016/0021-9797(80)90577-910.1016/0021-9797(80)90577-9 ↗
5. I. Martinez J. M. Haynes D. Langbein Fluid Statics and Capillarity inFluids and Material Sciences in Space(Ed.: H. U. Walter) Springer‐Verlag Heidelberg 1987 pp. 53–80.10.1007/978-3-642-46613-7_2 ↗
6. S. de Botton Mechanistic Study of Mercury Intrusion and Retraction M. Sc. Thesis Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana‐Iztapalapa México 1985.
7. 10.1016/S0001-8686(98)00057-810.1016/S0001-8686(98)00057-8 ↗
8. 10.1006/jcis.1997.505810.1006/jcis.1997.5058 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)00610-010.1016/S0927-7757(01)00610-0 ↗
10. 10.1039/f1988840078510.1039/f19888400785 ↗
11. R. H. López Characterization of Porous Media and Percolation and Transport Processes Ph.D. Thesis Universidad Nacional de San Luis Argentina 2004.
12. 10.1006/jcis.1993.146810.1006/jcis.1993.1468 ↗
13. 10.1088/0305-4470/33/9/30810.1088/0305-4470/33/9/308 ↗
14. 10.1016/0032-5910(81)85010-310.1016/0032-5910(81)85010-3 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0926-860X(03)00059-010.1016/S0926-860X(03)00059-0 ↗
16. D. H. Everett Adsorption Hysteresis inThe Solid–Gas Interface(Ed.: E. A. Flood) Marcel Dekker New York 1967 Vol. 2 pp. 1055–1113.
17. 10.1080/0098644850891129410.1080/00986448508911294 ↗
18. 10.1021/ie010112e10.1021/ie010112e ↗
19. 10.1021/i160028a00810.1021/i160028a008 ↗
20. C. D. Tsakiroglou A. C. Payatakes A New Mercury Intrusion‐Retration Simulator used as a Means for the Characterization of Porous Materials in: Characterization of Porous Solids II (Eds.: K. S. W. Sing F. Rodríguez‐Reinoso K. K. Unger J. Rouquerol) Elsevier Amsterdam 1991 pp. 169–178.10.1016/S0167-2991(08)61321-X ↗
21. 10.1016/S0309-1708(00)00002-610.1016/S0309-1708(00)00002-6 ↗
22. 10.1016/0021-9797(91)90212-Q10.1016/0021-9797(91)90212-Q ↗