A detailed experimental study of the effects of pre-bond contamination with a hydraulic fluid, thermal degradation, and poor curing on fracture toughness of composite-bonded joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Adhesive bonding is applied by the aircraft industry both for assembling composite structural parts and implementing composite patch repairs in damaged structural parts. In both applications, there exist several scenarios, related to surface contamination and processing, that could affect bonding quality and thus, degrade bond strength. In this paper, the detailed effects of pre-bond contamination with a hydraulic fluid, thermal degradation of the composite substrate, as well as poor curing (lower curing temperature) on strength of composite-bonded joints were studied experimentally by conducting mode I fracture toughness tests on double-cantilever beam specimens. These three application scenarios are possible to appear in the implementation of a composite patch repair in a damaged composite structural part. The experimental results showed a contradictory effect as the presence of the hydraulic fluid and poor curing degrades the fracture toughness whereas thermal degradation enhances fracture toughness of the composite-bonded joints. These findings are explained by means of extended non-destructive inspection, surface analysis, and evaluation of fracture surfaces.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Material Properties and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Banea MD · Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L: J. Mater. Des. Appl · 2009 · 223 · 1
2. 10.1533/978184569075510.1533/9781845690755 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-3-540-79056-310.1007/978-3-540-79056-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.02810.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.028 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00011-710.1016/S0266-3538(00)00011-7 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.08.02110.1016/j.compstruct.2010.08.021 ↗
7. Ecault R · Development of a laser shock wave adhesion test for the detection of weak composite bonds
8. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.569-57010.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.569-570 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.052 ↗
10. 10.1080/00218464.2013.77072010.1080/00218464.2013.770720 ↗
11. Skydrol 500 hydraulic fluid resistance of EC 1290 Scotchweld prime and AF 10 adhesive bonded joints. Convair Report. 1958. (no. 58-371).
12. Tomblin J · JAMS Technical Review · 2011
13. 10.1016/S0032-3861(97)00175-410.1016/S0032-3861(97)00175-4 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.03.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2011.03.019 ↗
15. 10.1080/0021846070145353610.1080/00218460701453536 ↗
16. Rider AN · Defence Science and Technology Organisation (Australia) · 2000
17. ISO 15024 · Fibre-reinforced plastic composites – determination of mode I interlaminar fracture toughness, GIC, for unidirectionally reinforced materials · 2001
18. Airbus · IPS-01-006-02 curing cycle for release test specimens · 2008
19. 10.1080/01621459.1979.1048104710.1080/01621459.1979.10481047 ↗
20. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.00 for Windows, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, www.graphpad.com.
21. 10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.58910.1037/0033-2909.96.3.589 ↗
22. 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-462810.1002/(ISSN)1097-4628 ↗
23. 10.1080/0021846980801225010.1080/00218469808012250 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00083-510.1016/S1359-835X(01)00083-5 ↗
25. ASTM D5573 · Standard practice for classifying failure modes in fiber-reinforced-plastic (FRP) joints · 2012