Strain rate dependence of adhesive joints for the automotive industry at low and high temperatures
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study the impact and quasi-static mechanical behaviour of single lap joints (SLJ) using a new crash resistant epoxy adhesive has been characterized as a function of temperature. Single lap adhesive joints were tested using a drop weight impact machine (impact tests) and using a universal test machine. Induction heating and nitrogen gas cooling was used in order to achieve a homogeneous distribution of temperature along the overlap of + 80 °C and −20 °C, respectively. Adherends made of mild steel, similar to the steel used in automobile construction, were chosen in order to study the yielding effect on the strength of the SLJ. Results showed that at room temperature (RT) and low temperature (LT), failure was dictated by the adherends due to the high strength of the adhesive. At high temperature (HT), a decrease was found in the maximum load and energy absorbed by the joint due to the reduced strength of the adhesive at this temperature. The results were successfully modelled using the commercially available finite element software Abaqus®. Good correlation was found between experimental and numerical results, which allows the reduction of experimental testing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto (FEUP), Oporto, Portugal
Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial (INEGI), Oporto, Portugal
Federal Centre of Technological Education in Rio de Janeiro (CEFET), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.00710.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.007 ↗
2. 10.1080/00218464.2017.128234910.1080/00218464.2017.1282349 ↗
3. 10.1177/146442071667150310.1177/1464420716671503 ↗
4. 10.1080/01694243.2016.122984210.1080/01694243.2016.1229842 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.11.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.11.006 ↗
6. 10.1080/00218464.2014.94339510.1080/00218464.2014.943395 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.02.00310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.02.003 ↗
8. Meschut G · 2015
9. Dean G · 1999
10. 10.1016/S0143-7496(02)00082-910.1016/S0143-7496(02)00082-9 ↗
11. 10.1080/00218464.2016.117911810.1080/00218464.2016.1179118 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0076195610.1007/BF00761956 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.172209810.1063/1.1722098 ↗
14. 10.1080/00218464.2015.109238710.1080/00218464.2015.1092387 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0143-7496(97)00032-810.1016/S0143-7496(97)00032-8 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.10.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.10.005 ↗
17. Banea MD · J Adhes Sci Technol · 2012 · 26 · 93910.1163/156856111X593649 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.03410.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.034 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.08.00410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.08.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.02.00310.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.02.003 ↗
21. 10.1080/00218464.2014.90380210.1080/00218464.2014.903802 ↗
22. 10.1023/A:100437031870910.1023/A:1004370318709 ↗
23. 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1985_199_102_0210.1243/PIME_PROC_1985_199_102_02 ↗
24. 10.1115/1.403420410.1115/1.4034204 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.09.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.09.005 ↗
26. 10.1080/00218464.2013.76367710.1080/00218464.2013.763677 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.07110.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.071 ↗
28. 10.1243/03093247V09318510.1243/03093247V093185 ↗