Influence of nano-reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of adhesively bonded single-lap joints subjected to static, quasi-static, and impact loading
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the effects of nano-reinforcement on the mechanical response of adhesively bonded single-lap joints with composite adherends subjected to different loading (strain) rates are systematically investigated. The results are then compared to those of the neat thermoset resin and a toughened acrylic–epoxy adhesive. More specifically, nano-reinforced and neat resin-bonded joints mating carbon/epoxy and glass/epoxy adherends were subjected to tensile loadings under 1.5 and 3 mm/min and tensile impacts at a loading rate of 2.04E + 5 mm/min. In some cases, additional tests were conducted to obtain the enhancement in properties that could be gained using the nano-reinforcements for use in our further numerical investigations. The other loading rates tried were 15, 150, and 1500 mm/min. The high loading rate tests were conducted, using a modified instrumented pendulum equipped with a specially designed impact load transfer apparatus. The dispersion of nanoparticles was facilitated using a mechanical stirrer and a three-roll mill machine. The results of the impact tests revealed the positive influence of nano-reinforcements on the loading rate sensitivity of the joints. In all, the overall stiffness and strength of the joints increased as the nano-reinforcement and loading rates were increased. The failure surfaces were then examined with a scanning electron microscope to observe the distribution of the nanoparticles and study the mode of failure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-3-642-01169-610.1007/978-3-642-01169-6 ↗
2. 10.1007/978-94-015-7764-910.1007/978-94-015-7764-9 ↗
3. Shahin K · Int. J. Solids Struct · 2008 · 45 · 624810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.07.030 ↗
4. 10.1080/1537649049026950010.1080/15376490490269500 ↗
5. Banea MD · J. Mater. Des. Appl · 2008 · 233 · 1
6. 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1985_199_102_0210.1243/PIME_PROC_1985_199_102_02 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.02.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.02.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.02.00610.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.02.006 ↗
9. 10.1016/0167-8442(95)00038-010.1016/0167-8442(95)00038-0 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.018 ↗
11. 10.1002/(ISSN)1548-056910.1002/(ISSN)1548-0569 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.12650010.1063/1.126500 ↗
13. 10.1088/0957-4484/14/7/31610.1088/0957-4484/14/7/316 ↗
14. 10.1023/A:100430510496410.1023/A:1004305104964 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.03.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.03.006 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00026-810.1016/S0143-7496(98)00026-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0143-7496(00)00044-010.1016/S0143-7496(00)00044-0 ↗