journal article·2024-06-17

Study on the bond properties between basalt fiber-reinforced spontaneous combustion coal gangue concrete and BFRP bars

Zhenrong Liu, Huaxin Liu, Weixing Xu, Beibei Liu, Yue Zhong, Jian Geng, Genjin Liu

Publisher page

Abstract

Microstructural characterization of spontaneous combustion coal gangue (SCCG), the hydration products and mechanism of spontaneous combustion coal gangue concrete (SCCGC) were discerned through microscopic analysis. The bond performance was assessed employing a central pull-out test on samples variably substituted with SCCG (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%) and augmented with basalt fiber (BF) (0%, 0.1%, 0.15%, and 0.2%). The failure mode and bonding mechanism were also revealed by this test. The bond-slip curves were fitted by various bond-slip constitutive models and a suitable model was found for each section. As indicated by the results, SCCGC possessed a lower carbon content and higher Al and Si element contents. These elements would undergo secondary hydration reactions with CH, which could enhance the strength of the ITZ and the compactness of the bond interface between BFRP bars and concrete. The failure modes were splitting and pull-out. An inverse correlation was observed between bond strength and the increment in SCCG aggregate substitution, ranging from a decline of 2.6% to 23.1%. As the BF content increased, the bond strength and peak slip increased by 3.9% ∼ 19.7% and 4.0% ∼ 14.6%, respectively. Furthermore, the reinforcing effect of BF on bond strength increased from 3.9% ∼ 10.3% to 8.8% ∼ 19.7% as the SCCG replacement rate increased, which was noticeable. The Malvar model and the Continuous Curve model were the best fitting models for the ascending and descending sections of bond-slip curves, respectively, while the residual stage was well fitted by the Hao Qingduo model.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Liaoning University of Technology, Jinzhou, China

School of Architecture, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China

Centre for Infrastructural Monitoring and Protection, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia

School of Civil Engineering, NingboTech University, Ningbo, China

School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China

Ningbo Municipal Group, Ningbo, China

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/ma1504145410.3390/ma15041454 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14366410.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143664 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12599910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125999 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.coal.2008.04.00310.1016/j.coal.2008.04.003 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11794610.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117946 ↗
6. 10.3390/ma1603123410.3390/ma16031234 ↗
7. 10.3390/ma1513449510.3390/ma15134495 ↗
8. 10.3390/ma1422680310.3390/ma14226803 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.05010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.050 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12121210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121212 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11933710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119337 ↗
12. Zhou M, Wang Q, Mu S. The effects on workability of concrete mixture of spontaneous combustion coal gangue coarse aggregate characteristics. Non-Met. Mines. 2013;36:8–11.
13. 10.2991/ifeem-17.2018.21710.2991/ifeem-17.2018.217 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.17610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.176 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12411410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124114 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.08210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.082 ↗
17. 10.3390/ma1513453110.3390/ma15134531 ↗
18. 10.1007/s12205-010-0547-010.1007/s12205-010-0547-0 ↗
19. 10.1007/978-3-0348-7612-410.1007/978-3-0348-7612-4 ↗
20. 10.1080/01694243.2020.171276910.1080/01694243.2020.1712769 ↗
21. 10.1080/01694243.2022.212725110.1080/01694243.2022.2127251 ↗
22. 10.1080/01694243.2021.192222110.1080/01694243.2021.1922221 ↗
23. 10.1016/0958-9465(95)00029-110.1016/0958-9465(95)00029-1 ↗
24. 10.3390/polym1417348010.3390/polym14173480 ↗
25. 10.3390/ma1306136210.3390/ma13061362 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.006 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12544210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125442 ↗
28. 10.1080/01694243.2022.214944210.1080/01694243.2022.2149442 ↗
29. 10.1080/01694243.2022.211758710.1080/01694243.2022.2117587 ↗
30. 10.1080/01694243.2012.68755410.1080/01694243.2012.687554 ↗
31. 10.1007/s13369-018-3303-210.1007/s13369-018-3303-2 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11333610.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113336 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.19810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.198 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000048710.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000487 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11672110.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116721 ↗
36. China Building Materials Federation. Common Portland Cement. GB 175-2007. 2007.
37. China Building Materials Federation. Pebble and crushed stone for construction. GB/T 14685-2022. 2022.
38. Chinese Standard, J. G. J. JGJ 55-2011. Specification for mix proportion design of ordinary concrete. Beijing, China, 2011.
39. ACI Committee. Guide for test methods for fiber reinforced polymers (FRP) for reinforcing and strengthening concrete structures (ACI 440.3 R-12). ACI Committee 440 2012).
40. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10554410.1016/j.jobe.2022.105544 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.cplett.2020.13725410.1016/j.cplett.2020.137254 ↗
42. ASTM D7913/D7913M-14. Standard test method for bond strength of fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite bars to concrete by pullout testing. 2014.
43. 10.1007/s12205-018-0051-510.1007/s12205-018-0051-5 ↗
44. 10.3390/s2012351310.3390/s20123513 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12660110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126601 ↗
46. 10.3390/ma1416473210.3390/ma14164732 ↗
47. Malvar LJ. Bond stress-slip characteristics of FRP rebars. Port Hueneme, California, USA: Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center, 1994.
48. Cosenza E, Manfredi G, Realfonzo R. 20 analytical modelling of bond between FRP reinforcing bars and concrete. Non-metallic (FRP) reinforcement for concrete structures proceedings of the second international RILEM symposium. CRC Press, 1995; p. 164.
49. Cosenza E. Bond characteristics and anchorage length of FRP rebars. In: M El-Badry, editor. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures, 1996, p. 909–916.
50. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(40)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(1997)1:2(40) ↗
51. Gao DY, Zhu HT, Xie JJ. The constitutive models for bond slip relation between FRP rebars and concrete. Ind Constr 2003;33(7):41–43.
52. Hao Q, et al. Bond-slip constitutive model between GFRP/STEEL wire composite rebars and concrete. Eng Mech. 2009;26(05):62–72.