Characterization of the damage mechanism in CFRP composites under mode I based on comprehensive analysis of AE signals
Source abstract
Abstract
This study utilises several methods centred on acoustic emission (AE) waveform characteristics to conduct in-depth analysis of the damage mechanism of composite materials under mode I. Combined with the peak frequency statistics and continuous wavelet transform (CWT) of AE signals, three damage modes of laminated composites during loading are identified. The cumulative energy of three damage modes separated by variational modal decomposition (VMD) is used to characterize their damage evolution process. Based on the findings, delamination and fiber–matrix debonding are proven to be the dominant damage mechanisms for mode I. The comprehensive analysis results from AE's accumulated energy, peak frequency distribution, CWT, VMD, and sentry function can accurately detect the onset time of delamination in laminates. The equivalent crack length is calculated by the load value determined at the initial time of delamination, and the strain energy release rate calculated by the load value and crack length at this time is used as the interlaminar fracture toughness value of mode I. This research method will provide a new idea for the damage tolerance analysis of mode I delamination in laminated structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Material Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou, China
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Jinling Institute of Technology, Nanjing, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10907910.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109079 ↗
2. 10.1080/01694243.2023.223065410.1080/01694243.2023.2230654 ↗
3. 10.1080/00218464.2022.210613210.1080/00218464.2022.2106132 ↗
4. 10.1080/01694243.2017.131069510.1080/01694243.2017.1310695 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.10426710.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104267 ↗
6. 10.1177/00219983880220120510.1177/002199838802201205 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.10708310.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107083 ↗
8. 10.1080/01694243.2022.214150010.1080/01694243.2022.2141500 ↗
9. 10.1177/089270571351981110.1177/0892705713519811 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.019 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.04710.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.047 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10443-015-9454-310.1007/s10443-015-9454-3 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11429910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114299 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.10381210.1016/j.tafmec.2023.103812 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.10899310.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108993 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10929110.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109291 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.018 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.01.02310.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.01.023 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10746910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107469 ↗
20. 10.1177/073168441558316610.1177/0731684415583166 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.03710.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.037 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10677810.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106778 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.04710.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.047 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.04810.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.048 ↗
25. 10.1177/002199831561569110.1177/0021998315615691 ↗
26. 10.1177/073168441454439110.1177/0731684414544391 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.01.02810.1016/j.apacoust.2017.01.028 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.02.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.02.013 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.012 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.003 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.01010.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.010 ↗
32. 10.1007/s11665-014-1291-210.1007/s11665-014-1291-2 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11339510.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113395 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00105-910.1016/S0013-7944(01)00105-9 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.006 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.003 ↗
37. Hashemi S, Kinloch AJ, Williams JM. The analysis of interlaminar fracture in uniaxial fibre-polymer composites. Proc Royal Soc. 1990;427(1872):173–199.
38. 10.1109/TSP.2013.228867510.1109/TSP.2013.2288675 ↗
39. ASTM D5528-01. Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2007.