Long-term durability assessment of 3D printed concrete
Source abstract
Abstract
Concrete 3D printing can be described as a revolution conquering the modern construction field. However, additive manufacturing is still confronted with many challenges and several limitations, such as the absence of building codes that regulate this construction approach. This technology is known to be environmentally friendly and its market is widening its horizons by implementing 3D printed concrete in harsh environments, such as bridges, infrastructures, and maritime applications. In this regard, the durability of those structures should be assessed to ensure sustainability. This study consists of assessing the durability of 3D printed concrete by comparing printed and casted samples aged by sulfuric acid attack. Three mixes were subjected to 0.5% sulfuric acid solution over 142 days. In addition to visual inspections of the samples, the mass loss was recorded periodically. Moreover, the total water porosity and the mechanical performance were evaluated. Both printed and casted samples showed degradation when placed in acid solutions, but the printed ones slightly resisted better during the first 84 days. However, after that date, both printed and casted samples presented comparable resistance. In addition, the mechanical performance came in accordance with the mass loss to prove that printed samples resisted well the acid attack by not losing much strength. In contrast, the strength drop rates in degraded printed samples were higher than those in the degraded casted elements between days 112 and 142. Moreover, the water porosity test showed that printed elements have a denser concrete matrix which protects the elements against chemical ingression.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Engineering, University of Balamand, UOB
Holcim Innovation Center
Laboratoire de Génie Civil et Géo-Environnement, University of Lille, IMT Nord Europe, University of Artois, Yncrea Hauts de France
Funding
University of Balamand Council
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12174510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121745 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.02610.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.026 ↗
3. Stefanoni M, Angst U, Elsener B. Corrosion challenges and opportunities in digital fabrication of reinforced concrete. Paper presented at the RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication; 2018. p. 225–233.
4. 10.1080/17452759.2017.132672410.1080/17452759.2017.1326724 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.00510.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.005 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.10578010.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105780 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10089410.1016/j.addma.2019.100894 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11709-017-0430-x10.1007/s11709-017-0430-x ↗
9. 10.1080/21650373.2019.170519910.1080/21650373.2019.1705199 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10553310.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105533 ↗
11. 10.1108/RPJ-09-2016-015410.1108/RPJ-09-2016-0154 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11805410.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118054 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.05110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.051 ↗
14. 10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z10.1617/s11527-012-9828-z ↗
15. Baz B, Remond S, Aouad G. Influence of the mix composition on the thixotropy of 3D printable mortars. Mag Concr Res. 2022:74(6):
16. 10.1080/17452759.2018.150042010.1080/17452759.2018.1500420 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.01210.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.012 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.12.00310.1016/j.cemconres.2011.12.003 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12674010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126740 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.10177910.1016/j.jobe.2020.101779 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12352410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123524 ↗
22. 10.1080/17452759.2020.171358010.1080/17452759.2020.1713580 ↗
23. 10.1007/s42107-020-00317-010.1007/s42107-020-00317-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11700210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117002 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11945710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119457 ↗
26. 10.1115/1.404410610.1115/1.4044106 ↗
27. Bukkapatnam S Mander J Paal S et al. 2017. Workshop report—NSF workshop on additive manufacturing (3D printing) for civil infrastructure design and construction. National Science Foundation (NSF) Arlington VA; 2017 Jul 13–14. Available from: https://events.tti.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/nsf-3dp-workshop-report.pdf
28. 10.4018/978-1-7998-6600-8.ch00610.4018/978-1-7998-6600-8.ch006 ↗
29. 10.3390/ma1209154010.3390/ma12091540 ↗
30. 10.1080/17452759.2018.147606410.1080/17452759.2018.1476064 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2018.06.001 ↗
32. 10.1080/17452759.2016.120986710.1080/17452759.2016.1209867 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.02010.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.020 ↗
34. Nerella VN, Ogura H, Mechtcherine V. Incorporating reinforcement into digital concrete construction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia; 2018. p. 1–8.
35. 10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e0019210.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00192 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.006 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cad.2015.04.00110.1016/j.cad.2015.04.001 ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:2(155)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:2(155) ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10390110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103901 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.09.01510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.09.015 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10831310.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108313 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12322010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123220 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12573110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125731 ↗
44. Van Der Putten J, De Schutter G, Van Tittelboom K. The effect of print parameters on the (micro) structure of 3D printed cementitious materials. Paper presented at the RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication; 2018. p. 234–244.
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11671010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116710 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.02.01710.1016/j.cemconres.2019.02.017 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.01910.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.019 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.01310.1016/j.autcon.2017.06.013 ↗
49. 10.1007/978-94-007-5413-3_210.1007/978-94-007-5413-3_2 ↗
50. ASTM D. Standard test method for length change of hydraulic-cement mortars exposed to a sulfate solution; 2012.
51. 10.1080/17452759.2022.204852110.1080/17452759.2022.2048521 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.03210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.032 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.10910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.109 ↗
54. 10.1016/B978-0-12-815481-6.00006-310.1016/B978-0-12-815481-6.00006-3 ↗
55. ASTM C. Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. C1437; 2007.
56. Standard E. 2009. Methods of testing cement-part 1: determination of strength. Ankara: Turkish Standards Institute.
57. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.06.01410.1016/j.cemconres.2013.06.014 ↗
58. AFNOR. Essai Pour Béton Durci—Essai de Porosité et de Masse Volumique—NF; 2010. p. 18–459.
59. 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00211-210.1016/S0008-8846(99)00211-2 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.006 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.04.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2005.04.006 ↗
62. Le Bescop P, Solet C. External sulphate attack by ground water: experimental study on CEM I cement pastes. Rev Eur Gén Civ. 2006;10(9):1127–1145.
63. 10.1080/21650373.2021.196781310.1080/21650373.2021.1967813 ↗
64. 10.1080/21650373.2018.153701410.1080/21650373.2018.1537014 ↗
65. 10.1080/01694243.2017.135339810.1080/01694243.2017.1353398 ↗
66. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.711.65910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.711.659 ↗
67. 10.1088/1757-899X/981/3/03207110.1088/1757-899X/981/3/032071 ↗
68. 10.1080/01694243.2015.104893110.1080/01694243.2015.1048931 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.014 ↗
70. 10.1016/S0958-9465(00)00037-810.1016/S0958-9465(00)00037-8 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03.01310.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03.013 ↗
72. 10.1080/01694243.2020.187008310.1080/01694243.2020.1870083 ↗