Influence of process parameters and its effects on friction stir welding of dissimilar aluminium alloy and its composites – a review
Source abstract
Abstract
Friction stir welding (FSW) is gaining attention over fusion welding is due to exceptional advantages. The advantages in FSW are superior joint properties, less preparation time, fumeless. FSW welding is widely employed in the automotive and aerospace sectors to join similar and dissimilar aluminium components. Many research articles have published particle reinforced Aluminium composite (AMC) FSW welding and reported improvement in mechanical properties. The paper focuses on the parameters used during welding to obtain good weld quality. The FSW joint efficiency of (AMC) varies between 80 and 95 percent, and joint efficiency is obtained by selecting the optimal combination of tool rotation speed, welding speed, and applied axial load. The tool rotation speed varies between 600 and 1200 rpm, with a 30–110 mm/min welding speed for uniform grain size in the joint using moderate axial loads. The tool profile and process parameters significantly impact welded joints' hardness and tensile behavior. The paper outlines the FSW process, operating ranges, and type of tools been used, which may be helpful for future research in the domain.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · MXene and MAX Phase Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0921-5093(91)90217-B10.1016/0921-5093(91)90217-B ↗
2. 10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00142-810.1016/S1359-835X(03)00142-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.06810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.07.068 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.02710.1016/j.msea.2016.08.027 ↗
5. Jayakumar J. Recent development and challenges in synthesis of magnesium matrix nano composites- a review. Int J Latest Res Sci Technol. 2012;1(2):164–171.
6. 10.1002/adem.20200032210.1002/adem.202000322 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.04210.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.042 ↗
8. 10.1007/s42452-020-2657-810.1007/s42452-020-2657-8 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.02910.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.029 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matchar.2016.07.01010.1016/j.matchar.2016.07.010 ↗
11. 10.1080/10426914.2012.70015610.1080/10426914.2012.700156 ↗
12. 10.1088/2053-1591/ac277110.1088/2053-1591/ac2771 ↗
13. Thomas CDW Nicholas E Needham J et al. Temple-Smith “Friction Stir Butt Welding ” The Welding Institute Cambridge United Kingdom United States Patent 5 460 317 1995.
14. 10.3390/met903027010.3390/met9030270 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mser.2005.07.00110.1016/j.mser.2005.07.001 ↗
16. 10.1023/A:102268890888510.1023/A:1022688908885 ↗
17. Mishra RS Ma ZY Charit I. Friction stir processing: a novel technique for fabrication of surface composite. 2003;341(1–2):1–4.10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00199-5 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma1413360410.3390/ma14133604 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.10396210.1016/j.rinp.2021.103962 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10075210.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100752 ↗
21. 10.1080/01694243.2021.198223710.1080/01694243.2021.1982237 ↗
22. 10.1088/2051-672X/ac312010.1088/2051-672X/ac3120 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10019005007810.1007/s100190050078 ↗
24. 10.1080/10426914.2016.115104910.1080/10426914.2016.1151049 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.00210.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.002 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.07110.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.071 ↗
27. 10.1051/matecconf/20181440300210.1051/matecconf/201814403002 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.03.09410.1016/j.msea.2018.03.094 ↗
29. 10.1080/01694243.2021.193883510.1080/01694243.2021.1938835 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.14610.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.146 ↗
31. 10.1080/01694243.2022.203705410.1080/01694243.2022.2037054 ↗
32. 10.1080/01694243.2020.178071610.1080/01694243.2020.1780716 ↗
33. 10.1007/s11661-002-0124-310.1007/s11661-002-0124-3 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.19210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.192 ↗
35. 10.14741/ijcet/v.8.6.210.14741/ijcet/v.8.6.2 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.00510.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.005 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.acme.2014.02.00110.1016/j.acme.2014.02.001 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11661-008-9586-210.1007/s11661-008-9586-2 ↗
39. 10.1007/s40997-020-00381-610.1007/s40997-020-00381-6 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01474-510.1016/S0921-5093(01)01474-5 ↗
41. 10.1179/174328009X41113610.1179/174328009X411136 ↗
42. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab30b110.1088/2053-1591/ab30b1 ↗
43. 10.1179/1879139512Y.000000001510.1179/1879139512Y.0000000015 ↗
44. 10.1179/174328406X7842410.1179/174328406X78424 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15418410.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154184 ↗
46. 10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63911-510.1016/S1003-6326(15)63911-5 ↗
47. 10.1007/s00170-009-2034-710.1007/s00170-009-2034-7 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.03.06110.1016/j.protcy.2016.03.061 ↗
49. 10.1007/s00170-010-2693-410.1007/s00170-010-2693-4 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.matchar.2004.03.00410.1016/j.matchar.2004.03.004 ↗
51. 10.1179/136217110X1278588955018110.1179/136217110X12785889550181 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.02310.1016/j.actaastro.2013.07.023 ↗
53. 10.1007/s00170-019-04837-110.1007/s00170-019-04837-1 ↗
54. 10.1007/s11665-012-0468-910.1007/s11665-012-0468-9 ↗
55. Sivachidambaram S Rajamurugan G Amirtharaj D. Optimizing the parameters for friction stir welding of dissimilar aluminium alloys AA5383/AA7075. ARP N J Eng Appl Sci. 2015; 10(12): 5434–5437 ISSN No:1819-6608.
56. 10.1007/s00170-017-1446-z10.1007/s00170-017-1446-z ↗
57. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.08710.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.087 ↗
58. 10.1007/s11665-021-05750-z10.1007/s11665-021-05750-z ↗
59. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.04010.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.040 ↗
60. 10.4271/2019-28-006310.4271/2019-28-0063 ↗
61. Shunmugasundaram M Kumar AP Sankar LP et al. Optimization of process parameters of friction stir welded dissimilar AA6063 and AA5052 aluminum alloys by Taguchi technique Mater Today Proc. 2020;27(2);871-876.10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.122 ↗
62. 10.1088/1757-899X/870/1/01216210.1088/1757-899X/870/1/012162 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.01.03110.1016/j.matdes.2006.01.031 ↗
64. 10.1007/s00170-018-2426-710.1007/s00170-018-2426-7 ↗
65. Fujii H Cui L Maeda M et al. Effect of tool shape on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded aluminium alloys. 2006;419:25–31.10.1016/j.msea.2005.11.045 ↗
66. Satheesh kumar K Rajamurugan G Manikkavasam P. Effect of process parameters on friction stir welding of dissimilar aluminium alloys. IOSR j. mech. civ. eng. 2014 49–53 ISSN No:2278-1684.
67. 10.1007/s00170-013-5256-710.1007/s00170-013-5256-7 ↗
68. 10.1007/s12666-015-0694-610.1007/s12666-015-0694-6 ↗
69. Saeidi M, Behnagh RA, Manafi B, et al. Study on ultrafine-grained aluminium matrix nanocomposite joint fabricated by friction stir welding. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl. 2016;230(1):311–318.
70. 10.1007/s12633-017-9615-010.1007/s12633-017-9615-0 ↗
71. 10.1080/2374068X.2020.181513410.1080/2374068X.2020.1815134 ↗
72. 10.1177/095440541557369710.1177/0954405415573697 ↗
73. 10.1007/978-981-13-1966-2_5310.1007/978-981-13-1966-2_53 ↗
74. 10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63028-410.1016/S1003-6326(14)63028-4 ↗
75. Ahmadnia M Shahraki S Kamarposhti MA. Experimental studies on optimized mechanical properties while dissimilar joining AA6061 and AA5010 in a friction stir welding process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2016;87:2337–2352.10.1007/s00170-016-8636-y ↗
76. 10.1007/s00170-011-3547-410.1007/s00170-011-3547-4 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.03510.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.035 ↗
78. Bindu MD, Tide PS, Bhasi AB, et al. Modeling and parametric optimization of friction stir welding of aluminium alloy AA7068-T6 using response surface methodology and desirability function analysis. Bull Polish Acad Sci Tech Sci. 2021;69(4):1–9.
79. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.93310.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.933 ↗
80. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2019-034910.1590/1980-5373-mr-2019-0349 ↗
81. 10.1007/s12633-020-00405-510.1007/s12633-020-00405-5 ↗
82. 10.1080/10426914.2014.99475410.1080/10426914.2014.994754 ↗
83. Kundu J, Singh H. Modelling and analysis of process parameters in friction stir welding of AA5083-H321 using response surface methodology. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2018;4(2):183–199.
84. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.11.03010.1016/j.jmapro.2017.11.030 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.03810.1016/j.jmapro.2020.09.038 ↗
86. 10.3390/met901002810.3390/met9010028 ↗
87. 10.1016/S1003-6326(17)60259-010.1016/S1003-6326(17)60259-0 ↗
88. 10.1177/095440541664598610.1177/0954405416645986 ↗
89. 10.1080/10426914.2015.110385610.1080/10426914.2015.1103856 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.09.03510.1016/j.matlet.2005.09.035 ↗
91. Bozkurt Y, KentlI A, Uzun H, et al. Experimental investigation and prediction of mechanical properties of friction stir welded aluminium metal matrix composite plates. Medziagotyra. 2012;18(4):336–340.
92. Farahmand Nikoo M, Parvin N, Bahrami M. Al2O3-fortifed AA6061-T6 joint produced via friction stir welding: the effects of traveling speed on microstructure, mechanical, and wear properties. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl. 2017;231(6):534–543.
93. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.00610.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.006 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.06510.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.065 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.12610.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.126 ↗
96. 10.3390/sym1304053710.3390/sym13040537 ↗
97. 10.1007/s11665-021-06181-610.1007/s11665-021-06181-6 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.dt.2019.08.01710.1016/j.dt.2019.08.017 ↗
99. 10.1177/00219983209210.1177/002199832092 ↗
100. 10.1177/0954408921100599410.1177/09544089211005994 ↗