journal article·1999-05

Excimer Laser Induced Removal of Particles from Hydrophilic Silicon Surfaces

X. Wu, E. Sacher, M. Meunier

The Journal of Adhesion· Volume 70· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A pulsed KrF excimer laser was used to remove several types of submicron-sized particles from silicon surfaces. Polystyrene latex particles, 0.1 μm and larger, were removed from silicon surfaces by dry laser cleaning (no water layer condensed on the surface) but SiO2 particles could not be so removed. However, during steam laser cleaning, in which a thin film of water is deposited on the surface as both an energy transfer medium and an adhesion force reduction agent, these 0.1–0.2 μm SiO2 particles were almost entirely removed. Calculations of the various forces contributing to adhesion indicate that hydrogen bonds are the major contributor to the adhesion of inorganic particles to substrate surfaces. Photoacoustic detection, using piezoelectric transducers, monitored the surface vibrations induced by the laser pulses. Key Words: Excimer lasersteam and dry cleaningsubmicron particulate removalphotoacoustic detectionhydrogen bonding
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser Material Processing Techniques · Laser Design and Applications · Advanced Sensor Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Kern, W. and Tolliver, D. 1993.Handbook of Semiconductor Wafer Cleaning Technology, Edited by: Kern, W. 3Park Ridge, New Jersey: Noyes Publications. 68 and 595
2. 10.1149/1.208682510.1149/1.2086825 ↗
3. Bardina, J. 1988.Particles on Surfaces, Edited by: Mittal, K. L. Vol. 1, 329New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4615-9531-1_25 ↗
4. Ohmori T. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1989 · 137 · 399C
5. 10.1038/scientificamerican0690-8610.1038/scientificamerican0690-86 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.10493110.1063/1.104931 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.10492310.1063/1.104923 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.35090610.1063/1.350906 ↗
9. 10.1117/12.4370110.1117/12.43701 ↗
10. 10.1109/95.33505010.1109/95.335050 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.10735410.1063/1.107354 ↗
12. 10.1364/OL.17.00180910.1364/OL.17.001809 ↗
13. Yavas O. · Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 58 · 40710.1007/BF00323618 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.36128010.1063/1.361280 ↗
15. 10.1080/0021846970801052710.1080/00218469708010527 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.35912810.1063/1.359128 ↗
17. 10.1016/0001-8686(67)80004-610.1016/0001-8686(67)80004-6 ↗
18. Bowling R. A. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1985 · 132 · 2209
19. 10.1080/0278682870895915510.1080/02786828708959155 ↗
20. 10.1098/rspa.1971.014110.1098/rspa.1971.0141 ↗
21. 10.1146/annurev.ms.26.080196.00032110.1146/annurev.ms.26.080196.000321 ↗
22. 10.1163/156856194X0065410.1163/156856194X00654 ↗
23. Knozinger H. · 1976
24. Sugino R. · IEICE Trans. Electron. · 1992 · 75 · 829
25. 10.1016/0021-9797(70)90212-210.1016/0021-9797(70)90212-2 ↗
26. Pauling L. · 1960
27. Israelachvili J. · 1991
28. Wu X. · J. Appl. Phys.
29. Burgreen, D. 1971.Elements of Thermal Stress Analysis, 1–28. New York, Jamaica: C. P. Press. 89–91