journal article·1974-01

Graphite Fibre-Epoxy Matrix Interface Interactions

H. M. Hawthorne, E. Teghtsoonian

The Journal of Adhesion· Volume 6· Issue 1-2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Studies of fibre-epoxy resin matrix model composites show that the “tensile debond” test is not applicable to carbon or graphite fibres. Fibre fracture occurs under the compression strains involved relieving interface stresses and precluding subsequent debond. Calculated minimum bond strengths for pitch-based graphite fibres are similar to results for boron and glass fibres. Interfacial failure is obtained with the “shear debond” test for low and intermediate modulus graphite fibres, but compression fracture also occurs first with high modulus fibres. Pitch-based graphite fibres show a decreasing adhesive interaction with epoxy resin the more oriented the fibre, but results compare favorably with those of other fibres. Surface characterisation shows that all pitch-based graphite fibres exhibit a surface-oriented skin, although surface roughness increases with fibre modulus. The fibres all exhibit similar apparent surface energy characteristics which suggests that wettability does not play a significant role in determining interfacial bond strengths.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. McKee D. W. · 1970
2. 10.1080/002184670854459410.1080/0021846708544594 ↗
3. 1969
4. 10.1520/STP44698S10.1520/STP44698S ↗
5. 10.1007/BF0055001910.1007/BF00550019 ↗
6. McCuIlough R. L. · 1971
7. Larsen , J. V. 1971. 161st A. C. S. Mtg. (Org. Coatings and Plast. Chem.) Paper 61, Los Angeles, April
8. 10.1088/0022-3727/4/11/31910.1088/0022-3727/4/11/319 ↗
9. Lovelace A. M. · Materials Research and Standards, MTRSA · 1971 · 11 · 8
10. Hancox N. L. · J. Materials Sci. · 1972 · 710.1007/BF00550067 ↗
11. 10.1038/227946a010.1038/227946a0 ↗
12. Hawthorne , H. M.Proc. 1st International Carbon Fibres Conf. London, 1971, Plastics and Polymers Conf. Supplement #5 81
13. Butler , B. L. 1969. Ph.D. Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
14. Grindstaff T. H. · Textile Research J. · 1969 · 39 · 95810.1177/004051756903901009 ↗
15. Mozzo G. · 1968
16. Broutman L. J. · Mod. Plastics · 1962 · 40 · 161
17. Shortall J. B. · 1972
18. 10.1177/00219983680020020810.1177/002199836800200208 ↗
19. 10.1520/STP44697S10.1520/STP44697S ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0055019210.1007/BF00550192 ↗
21. 1971.Rech. Aerosp. # 1,52, Jan./Feb.
22. 10.1038/physci233163a010.1038/physci233163a0 ↗
23. Schlabach T. D. · 1964
24. Scola , D. A. 1971. Calculated from data supplied by (United Aircraft Lab.)
25. Hawthorne , H. M. to be published
26. Tuinstra F. · J. Composite Materials · 1970 · 4 · 49210.1177/002199837000400405 ↗
27. 10.1038/230377a010.1038/230377a0 ↗
28. 10.1007/BF0054937710.1007/BF00549377 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.166093610.1063/1.1660936 ↗
30. Chwastiak S. · A. C. S. Preprints (Org. Coatings and Plastics Chem.) · 1971 · 13 · 437
31. 10.1021/ba-1964-0043.ch00110.1021/ba-1964-0043.ch001 ↗
32. Fowkes F. M. · 1965 · 2
33. Duga , J. J. 1969.Surface Energy of Ceramic Materials, D. C. I. C. Report 69–2.10.21236/AD0691019 ↗
34. Yamamoto M. · 1971 · 179
35. Young G. Y. · J. A. C. S. · 1954 · 58 · 313
36. 10.1021/ja01869a02910.1021/ja01869a029 ↗
37. 10.1016/0095-8522(50)90044-410.1016/0095-8522(50)90044-4 ↗