Efficient inverted organic light-emitting devices using a charge-generation unit as electron-injection layers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Efficient electron injection from cathode to electron transport layer is generally required to realize high-performance inverted organic light-emitting devices (IOLEDs). In this work, highly efficient IOLEDs are developed by employing a non-doped charge-generation unit of 1,4,5,8,9,11-hexaazatriphenylene-hexacarbonitrile (HAT-CN)/Al/LiF as electron-injection layers (EILs). The ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) shows that the insertion of HAT-CN layer reduces the work function of EILs by 0.21 eV. Combined with the current-voltage characteristics of electron-only devices, the role of the HAT-CN layer in promoting electron injection is confirmed. What's more, the double EILs device with Rubrene as a probe verifies the strong hole blocking ability of HAT-CN/Al/LiF. Based on the EILs, the inverted blue phosphorescent OLEDs with a maximum current efficiency of 29.4 cd/A are realized. The excellent performance proves the superiority of HAT-CN/Al/LiF as EILs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Dobbertin · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 28410.1063/1.1535743 ↗
2. Xiong · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 240
3. Helander · Science · 2011 · 332 · 94410.1126/science.1202992 ↗
4. Uoyama · Nature · 2012 · 492 · 23410.1038/nature11687 ↗
5. Ford · Acs Nano · 2014 · 8 · 917310.1021/nn502794z ↗
6. Wang · J. Mater. Chem. C. · 2020 · 8 · 990910.1039/D0TC00893A ↗
7. Fortunato · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 294510.1002/adma.201103228 ↗
8. Petti · Appl. Phys. Rev. · 2016 · 310.1063/1.4953034 ↗
9. Chen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 3610
10. Lee · Org. Electron. · 2011 · 12 · 176310.1016/j.orgel.2011.07.015 ↗
11. Liu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 40
12. Peng · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2014 · 2 · 86410.1039/C3TC32020K ↗
13. Hofle · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 275010.1002/adma.201304666 ↗
14. Tokmoldin · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 347510.1002/adma.200802594 ↗
15. Meyer · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 20 · 383910.1002/adma.200800949 ↗
16. Xiao · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 92610.1002/adma.201003128 ↗
17. Lou · Org. Electron. · 2016 · 2 · 8810.1016/j.orgel.2015.10.012 ↗
18. Nomura · Nature · 2004 · 432 · 48810.1038/nature03090 ↗
19. Wu · J. Disp. Technol. · 2005 · 1 · 24810.1109/JDT.2005.858942 ↗
20. Hsieh · Sid Symposium Digest of Technical Papers · 2011 · 42 · 71410.1889/1.3621425 ↗
21. Nagamura · Carbon · 2019 · 152 · 68010.1016/j.carbon.2019.06.038 ↗
22. Li · Org. Electron. · 2020 · 76 · 10544510.1016/j.orgel.2019.105445 ↗
23. Wang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 122 · 12550110.1063/1.4993873 ↗
24. Tang · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2015 · 3 · 1239910.1039/C5TC03108G ↗
25. Li · Jan. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 56
26. Lee · Org. Electron. · 2011 · 13 · 54510.1016/j.orgel.2011.12.024 ↗
27. Kim · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 43
28. Yuan · Org. Electron. · 2020 · 83 · 10574510.1016/j.orgel.2020.105745 ↗
29. Lee · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 15330610.1063/1.3400224 ↗
30. Lee · J. Kor. Phys. Soc. · 2012 · 61 · 153610.3938/jkps.61.1536 ↗
31. Chen · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 516410.1039/c2jm16463a ↗
32. Lee · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2017 · 5 · 991110.1039/C7TC02795H ↗