Suppression of efficiency roll-off in TADF-OLEDs using Ag-island nanostructures with localized surface plasmon resonance effect
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) based on thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) have emerged as promising alternatives to phosphorescent OLEDs for harvesting both singlet and triplet excitons. However, the development of TADF-OLEDs meets a thorny problem of serious efficiency roll-off at high luminance. Here, we demonstrate an approach to suppress the efficiency roll-off characteristics in TADF-OLEDs by localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effect of easy-fabricated Ag-island nanostructures. Compared with the common TADF-OLEDs at a high current density of 100 mA cm −2 , the efficiency roll-off ratio of the TADF-OLEDs with Ag-island nanostructures decreases from 49.75% to 35.76% significantly, and the maximum current efficiency is increased by 10.5%. The performance enhancement is mainly attributed to the coupling between excitons and localized surface plasmons (LSPs), which could alter the excited state kinetic characteristics of TADF molecules.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Tang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1987 · 51 · 91310.1063/1.98799 ↗
2. Sun · Nature · 2006 · 440 · 90810.1038/nature04645 ↗
3. Reineke · Nature · 2009 · 459 · 23410.1038/nature08003 ↗
4. Helander · Science · 2011 · 332 · 94410.1126/science.1202992 ↗
5. Endo · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 480210.1002/adma.200900983 ↗
6. Uoyama · Nature · 2012 · 492 · 23410.1038/nature11687 ↗
7. Hirata · Nat. Mater. · 2015 · 14 · 33010.1038/nmat4154 ↗
8. Zhang · Nat. Photonics · 2014 · 8 · 32610.1038/nphoton.2014.12 ↗
9. Zhang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 1904010.1021/acsami.7b04391 ↗
10. Masui · Org. Electron · 2013 · 14 · 272110.1016/j.orgel.2013.07.010 ↗
11. Zhang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 476910.1021/acsami.6b15272 ↗
12. Inouea · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 6210.1016/j.cplett.2015.11.042 ↗
13. Cai · Chem. Sci. · 2016 · 7 · 426410.1039/C6SC00542J ↗
14. Komino · Chem. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 303810.1021/cm4011597 ↗
15. Wang · Chem. Commun. · 2015 · 51 · 1197210.1039/C5CC04469C ↗
16. Kelly · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 66810.1021/jp026731y ↗
17. Hutter · Adv. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 168510.1002/adma.200400271 ↗
18. Barnes · Nature · 2003 · 424 · 82410.1038/nature01937 ↗
19. Kwon · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 125310.1002/adma.200701130 ↗
20. Chen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 01330310.1063/1.3141513 ↗
21. Togashi · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 2068910.1039/c2jm33669c ↗
22. Liu · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1255510.1038/srep12555 ↗
23. Hu · Org. Electron · 2016 · 31 · 23410.1016/j.orgel.2016.01.031 ↗
24. Kochuveedu · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 496610.1039/C4NR00241E ↗
25. Fort · J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 41 · 01300110.1088/0022-3727/41/1/013001 ↗
26. Zhang · Org. Electron · 2014 · 15 · 96110.1016/j.orgel.2014.02.007 ↗
27. Kumar · Org. Electron · 2012 · 13 · 15910.1016/j.orgel.2011.10.008 ↗
28. Ji · Org. Electron · 2015 · 22 · 15410.1016/j.orgel.2015.03.053 ↗
29. Zhao · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109 · 01330310.1063/1.4955129 ↗
30. Lee · Nano Energy · 2015 · 13 · 14010.1016/j.nanoen.2015.01.050 ↗
31. Gaynor · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 400610.1002/adma.201300923 ↗
32. Meerheim · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 04331010.1063/1.2966784 ↗
33. Kumar · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 20330410.1063/1.4806979 ↗
34. Xiao · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 01330810.1063/1.3675970 ↗
35. Tam · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 49610.1021/nl062901x ↗
36. Kinkhabwala · Nat. Photonics · 2009 · 3 · 65410.1038/nphoton.2009.187 ↗