Metal organic vapor phase epitaxy of high-indium-composition InGaN quantum dots towards red micro-LEDs
Source abstract
Abstract
Micro-scale light-emitting diodes (micro-LEDs) are regarded as the next generation display technology. Compared to blue and green ones, InGaN-based red micro-LEDs require higher indium composition in their active region, which is quite challenging for material growth. Here, high-indium-composition InGaN quantum dots (QDs) with a density of 3 × 10 10 cm -2 are self-assembly grown by metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy (MOVPE) based on a precursor-alternate-admittance method. The growth mechanism is systematically studied, and consequently a 613-nm red QDs sample with an internal quantum efficiency (IQE) of 12% is demonstrated. Furthermore, when micro-LEDs based on these red InGaN QDs with a chip size of 1-20 µm are fabricated, an electroluminescence blueshift to yellow and green is observed. The 20-µm and 1-µm micro-LEDs show 4.92% and 1.78% external quantum efficiency (EQE) at 0.3 and 20 A/cm 2 , respectively. By introducing multiple quantum wells (MQWs) pre-strained layer beneath the QD layers, a 10-µm micro-LED with 638 nm emission wavelength is demonstrated, with a price of reduced EQE to 0.03% at 10 A/cm 2 .
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · ZnO doping and properties · Ga2O3 and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Day · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 03111610.1063/1.3615679 ↗
2. Wong · Opt. Express · 2018 · 26 · 2132410.1364/OE.26.021324 ↗
3. Huang · Light: Sci. Appl. · 2020 · 9 · 110.1038/s41377-019-0231-1 ↗
4. Horng · Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 110.1038/s41598-019-56847-4 ↗
5. Oh · Opt. Express · 2018 · 26 · 1119410.1364/OE.26.011194 ↗
6. Wong · Opt. Express · 2020 · 28 · 578710.1364/OE.384127 ↗
7. Impact of the surface recombination on InGaN/GaN-based blue micro-light emitting diodes10.1364/OE.27.00A643 ↗
8. Jiang · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 110.9734/JSRR/2015/14076 ↗
9. Nakamura · Science · 1998 · 281 · 95610.1126/science.281.5379.956 ↗
10. Li · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2015 · 51 · 110.1109/JQE.2015.2469097 ↗
11. Bulashevich · Phys. Status Solidi RRL · 2016 · 10 · 48010.1002/pssr.201600059 ↗
12. Zhuang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 116 · 17350110.1063/5.0006910 ↗
13. Zhang · Photonics Res. · 2020 · 8 · 167110.1364/PRJ.402555 ↗
14. Chichibu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 200610.1063/1.122350 ↗
15. Ding · Appl. Sci. · 2019 · 9 · 120610.3390/app9061206 ↗
16. Mukai · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 38 · 397610.1143/JJAP.38.3976 ↗
17. Funato · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 45 · L65910.1143/JJAP.45.L659 ↗
18. Pasayat · Appl. Phys. Express · 2021 · 14 · 01100410.35848/1882-0786/abd06f ↗
19. Zhuang · Photonics Res. · 2021 · 9 · 179610.1364/PRJ.428168 ↗
20. Li · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2022 · 120 · 04110210.1063/5.0078771 ↗
21. Wierer Jr · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2019 · 13 · 190014110.1002/lpor.201900141 ↗
22. Weng · Opt. Express · 2016 · 24 · 1554610.1364/OE.24.015546 ↗
23. Wang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 122810.1021/acsami.8b16767 ↗
24. Frost · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 2013 · 49 · 92310.1109/JQE.2013.2281062 ↗
25. Frost · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 55 · 03210110.7567/JJAP.55.032101 ↗
26. Lv · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 52 · 08J10.7567/JJAP.52.08JG13 ↗
27. Wang · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2021 · 15 · 200040610.1002/lpor.202000406 ↗
28. Zhao · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2012 · 209 · 109610.1002/pssa.201127368 ↗
29. Zhao · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 01431110.1063/1.3607602 ↗
30. Gibart · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2004 · 67 · 66710.1088/0034-4885/67/5/R02 ↗
31. Lahmann · Physica Status Solidi C · 2003 · 2202 · 220510.1109/NUSOD.2004.1345089 ↗
32. Yu · Appl. Phys. Express · 2015 · 8 · 09400110.7567/APEX.8.094001 ↗