Activation and deactivation effects to Ho^3+ at ~28 μm MIR emission by Yb^3+ and Pr^3+ ions in YAG crystal
Source abstract
Abstract
The use of Yb3+ and Pr3+ co-doping with Ho3+ to enhance the Ho3+: I-5(6)-> I-5(7)similar to 2.8 mu m emissions are investigated in the YAG crystal for the first time. Absorption spectra of the Yb:Ho:YAG and Yb:Ho:Pr:YAG crystals find that doping of Yb3+ increase absorption intensity within 850-1050nm and make the crystals suitable to high-power InGaAs LDs. Fluorescence spectra show that similar to 2.8 mu m lasers may be realized on both crystals at different wavelengths, with the maximum emission cross section of 1.69 x 10(-20) cm(2) at 2780 nm for Yb: Ho: Pr: YAG and 1.23 x 10(-20) cm(2) at 2848 nm for Yb: Ho: YAG. Lifetime results and energy transfer analyses indicate that activator Yb3+ ions can prolong the higher laser level of Ho3+: I-5(6) and deactivator Pr3+ ions are able to depopulate the lower laser level of Ho3+: I-5(7), both beneficial to population inversion and contributed to facilitate similar to 2.8 mu m laser operations. All these results indicate that Yb: Ho: Pr: YAG crystal is a promising laser medium for LD-pumped similar to 2.8 mu m laser applications. (C) 2016 Optical Society of America
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solid State Laser Technologies · Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Moser · IEEE J. Sel. Top Quant. · 1996 · 2 · 87210.1109/2944.577309 ↗
2. Sanghera · IEEE J. Sel. Top Quant. · 2009 · 15 · 11410.1109/JSTQE.2008.2010245 ↗
3. Tacke · Infrared Phys. Technol. · 1995 · 36 · 44710.1016/1350-4495(94)00101-P ↗
4. Vodopyanov · Opt. Lett. · 2000 · 25 · 84110.1364/OL.25.000841 ↗
5. Rabinovich · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 1991 · 27 · 89510.1109/3.83322 ↗
6. Payne · J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 77 · 427410.1063/1.359449 ↗
7. Zhang · Opt. Lett. · 2014 · 39 · 394210.1364/OL.39.003942 ↗
8. Diening · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 406310.1063/1.373031 ↗
9. Chen · Opt. Commun. · 2014 · 321 · 18310.1016/j.optcom.2014.01.072 ↗
10. Wang · Opt. Lett. · 2013 · 38 · 398810.1364/OL.38.003988 ↗
11. Hu · Opt. Lett. · 2012 · 37 · 214510.1364/OL.37.002145 ↗
12. Zhang · Opt. Lett. · 2012 · 37 · 524110.1364/OL.37.005241 ↗
13. Zhang · J. Lumin. · 2015 · 158 · 21510.1016/j.jlumin.2014.10.003 ↗
14. Zhao · Appl. Opt. · 2015 · 54 · 159410.1364/AO.54.001594 ↗
15. Rothacher · Opt. Commun. · 1998 · 155 · 6810.1016/S0030-4018(98)00348-4 ↗
16. Nikitichev · Proc. SPIE · 1996 · 2772 · 3510.1117/12.238118 ↗
17. Ofelt · J. Chem. Phys. · 1962 · 37 · 51110.1063/1.1701366 ↗
18. Judd · Phys. Rev. · 1962 · 127 · 75010.1103/PhysRev.127.750 ↗
19. Preda · Phys. Scr. · 2009 · 79 · 03530410.1088/0031-8949/79/03/035304 ↗
20. Walsh · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 2006 · 67 · 156710.1016/j.jpcs.2006.01.123 ↗
21. Aull · IEEE J. Quantum Electron. · 1982 · 18 · 92510.1109/JQE.1982.1071611 ↗