journal article·2015-09-01Open access

Faraday activity in flexible maghemite/polymer matrix composites

J.L. Menéndez, L. Fernández-García, C. Pecharromán, I. Montero, A. Esteban-Cubillo, P. Tiemblo, N. García

Optical Materials Express· Volume 5· Issue 9

Abstract

Homogeneous 10-30 nm γ-FeO (maghemite) nanoparticles have been synthesized on magnesium silicate fibers and further incorporated into a polymeric matrix (polystyrene). The similarity in the refractive indices of both materials (n = 1.53 and n = 1.59) and the optimal dispersion allowed obtaining highly transparent composites from near IR to the visible range. Therefore, particles of γ-FeO appear perfectly dispersed inside a heterogeneous but transparent matrix, and consequently, it is possible to measure their Faraday rotation. These composites present a ferromagnetic behavior, yet close to superparmagnetism due to the size of the γ-FeO particles. High real in-line transmittance in the visible range together with a Faraday activity over 0.4° are obtained in 60 μm films, which is over twice larger than that reported for commercially available devices based on single crystal terbium gallium garnets.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Photonic and Optical Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Lu · J. Cryst. Growth · 2011 · 314 · 15710.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.12.018 ↗
2. Chen · Opt. Mater. · 2015 · 44 · 4810.1016/j.optmat.2015.02.029 ↗
3. Ziolo · Science · 1992 · 257 · 21910.1126/science.257.5067.219 ↗
4. Tepper · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 694810.1063/1.1540033 ↗
5. Guerrero · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 71 · 269810.1063/1.120181 ↗
6. Taboada · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2006 · 301 · 17510.1016/j.jmmm.2005.06.019 ↗
7. Libaers · Proc. SPIE · 2009 · 7467 · 74670C10.1117/12.824515 ↗
8. Jain · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 164410.1021/nl900007k ↗
9. Nakashima · Opt. Express · 2012 · 20 · 2819110.1364/OE.20.028191 ↗
10. Royer · Eur. Phys. J. AP · 2003 · 22 · 8310.1051/epjap:2003027 ↗
11. Tiemblo · RSC Advances · 2012 · 2 · 91510.1039/C1RA00873K ↗
12. Fernández-García · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2013 · 15 · 211910.1007/s11051-013-2119-y ↗
13. Pecharromán · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2006 · 89 · 304310.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01190.x ↗
14. Pecharromán · Plasmonics · 2009 · 4 · 26110.1007/s11468-009-9101-7 ↗
15. García · Langmuir · 2011 · 27 · 395210.1021/la104410r ↗
16. Esteban-Cubillo · J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2008 · 28 · 176310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.11.022 ↗
17. Tiemblo · RSC Advances · 2012 · 2 · 91510.1039/C1RA00873K ↗
18. Fujii · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 319510.1103/PhysRevB.59.3195 ↗
19. Esteban-Cubillo · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 286410.1021/jp077173w ↗
20. Pecharroman · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2006 · 89 · 304310.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01190.x ↗
21. Zayat · Adv. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 180910.1002/adma.200305436 ↗
22. Litter · Can. J. Chem. · 1992 · 70 · 250210.1139/v92-316 ↗
23. Grau-Crespo · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2010 · 22 · 25540110.1088/0953-8984/22/25/255401 ↗