Effect of the nanopillar diameter on diamond silicon vacancy center spin lifetime
Source abstract
Abstract
Color centers in diamond micro and nano-structures play an important role in a wide range of quantum technologies. However, obtaining high-quality color centers in small structures is challenging, as properties such as spin population lifetimes can be affected by the transition from a bulk to nanostructured crystal host. In this manuscript, we measure how population lifetimes of silicon vacancy center orbital states change when they are created in nanopillars whose diameters vary from 1 μ m to 120 nm. We also discuss the influence of annealing methods on the silicon vacancy inhomogeneous linewidth. After selecting a sample with low inhomogeneous broadening and patterning it with nanopillars, we expected that restricted vibrational modes in the smallest structures could extend spin population lifetimes. However, we found that this effect was masked by other effects that reduced population lifetimes, suggesting that imperfections in the crystal lattice or surface damage caused by etching can influence SiV spins.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Cardiff University
University of New Mexico, Center for High Technology Materials and Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of Latvia
University of Geneva
Constructor University
Funding
European Commission · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Alberta Innovates · Canada Foundation for Innovation · Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Maze · Nature · 2008 · 455 · 64410.1038/nature07279 ↗
2. Degen · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2017 · 89 · 03500210.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002 ↗
3. Burek · Optica · 2016 · 3 · 140410.1364/OPTICA.3.001404 ↗
4. Golter · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 14360210.1103/PhysRevLett.116.143602 ↗
5. Lee · J. Opt. · 2017 · 19 · 03300110.1088/2040-8986/aa52cd ↗
6. Shandilya · J. Lightwave Technol. · 2022 · 40 · 753810.1109/JLT.2022.3210466 ↗
7. Jelezko · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 13050110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.130501 ↗
8. Dutt · Science · 2007 · 316 · 131210.1126/science.1139831 ↗
9. Fuchs · Nat. Phys. · 2011 · 7 · 78910.1038/nphys2026 ↗
10. Hensen · Nature · 2015 · 526 · 68210.1038/nature15759 ↗
11. Childress · MRS Bull. · 2013 · 38 · 13410.1557/mrs.2013.20 ↗
12. Atatüre · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2018 · 3 · 3810.1038/s41578-018-0008-9 ↗
13. Salz · Appl. Phys. B · 2020 · 126 · 13110.1007/s00340-020-07478-5 ↗
14. Janitz · Optica · 2020 · 7 · 123210.1364/OPTICA.398628 ↗
15. Evans · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2016 · 5 · 04401010.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.044010 ↗
16. Kehayias · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 18810.1038/s41467-017-00266-4 ↗
17. Schröder · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 2016 · 33 · B6510.1364/JOSAB.33.000B65 ↗
18. Zhang · Optica · 2017 · 4 · 131710.1364/OPTICA.4.001317 ↗
19. Fujita · Science · 2005 · 308 · 129610.1126/science.1110417 ↗
20. Lutz · Phys. Rev. A · 2016 · 94 · 01380110.1103/PhysRevA.94.013801 ↗
21. Sipahigil · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 11360210.1103/PhysRevLett.113.113602 ↗
22. Marseglia · Opt. Express · 2018 · 26 · 8010.1364/OE.26.000080 ↗
23. Weinzetl · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2019 · 122 · 06360110.1103/PhysRevLett.122.063601 ↗
24. Sipahigil · Science · 2016 · 354 · 84710.1126/science.aah6875 ↗
25. Sohn · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 201210.1038/s41467-018-04340-3 ↗
26. Wein · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 97 · 20541810.1103/PhysRevB.97.205418 ↗
27. Maity · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 11 · 19310.1038/s41467-019-13822-x ↗
28. Nguyen · Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 100 · 16542810.1103/PhysRevB.100.165428 ↗
29. Silani · ACS Photonics · 2019 · 6 · 257710.1021/acsphotonics.9b01135 ↗
30. Stas · Science · 2022 · 378 · 55710.1126/science.add9771 ↗
31. Becker · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 120 · 05360310.1103/PhysRevLett.120.053603 ↗
32. Neu · New J. Phys. · 2011 · 13 · 02501210.1088/1367-2630/13/2/025012 ↗
33. Jahnke · New J. Phys. · 2015 · 17 · 04301110.1088/1367-2630/17/4/043011 ↗
34. Sukachev · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 119 · 22360210.1103/PhysRevLett.119.223602 ↗
35. Meesala · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 97 · 20544410.1103/PhysRevB.97.205444 ↗
36. Kuruma · 202310.48550/arXiv.2310.06236 ↗
37. Klotz · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2022 · 128 · 15360210.1103/PhysRevLett.128.153602 ↗
38. Rugar · Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 99 · 20541710.1103/PhysRevB.99.205417 ↗
39. Ziegler · Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B: Beam Interactions with Mater. Atoms · 2010 · 268 · 181810.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091 ↗
40. Hadden · Opt. Lett. · 2018 · 43 · 358610.1364/OL.43.003586 ↗
41. Zuber · Nano Lett. · 2023 · 23 · 1090110.1021/acs.nanolett.3c03145 ↗
42. Chu · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 198210.1021/nl404836p ↗
43. Lühmann · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 51 · 48300210.1088/1361-6463/aadfab ↗
44. Sangtawesin · Phys. Rev. X · 2019 · 9 · 03105210.1103/PhysRevX.9.031052 ↗
45. Ngambou · Mater. Quantum. Technol. · 2022 · 2 · 04500110.1088/2633-4356/ac9948 ↗
46. Lang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 116 · 110.1063/1.5143014 ↗
47. Fu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 12190710.1063/1.3364135 ↗
48. Khanaliloo · Phys. Rev. X · 2015 · 5 · 04105110.1103/PhysRevX.5.041051 ↗
49. Dhomkar · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 120 · 11740110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.117401 ↗
50. Nicolas · 201910.48550/arXiv.1901.10853 ↗
51. Liu · Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2020 · 4 · 05520210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.055202 ↗
52. Liu · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2018 · 9 · 06401910.1103/PhysRevApplied.9.064019 ↗