journal article·2025-06-01Open access

On the bounds of index tuning in transparent conducting oxides: opinion

Nathaniel Kinsey, Jacob B. Khurgin

Optical Materials Express· Volume 15· Issue 6

Abstract

For more than a decade, the linear and nonlinear optical responses of materials and composites exhibiting an epsilon-near-zero (ENZ) region have been of keen interest to the community. Among the variety of effects realized, achieving index modulation near unity on the picosecond (or less) timescale has generated the most significant impact. As a long-sought combination of strength and speed, ENZ nonlinearities have reignited interest in nonlinear processes that appear to go beyond the typical perturbative expansion (e.g., non-perturbative) as well as in time-varying nonlinear processes. Here, we aim to take a physical and intuitive look at the nonlinear index modulation in Drude-like ENZ films and highlight the physical limits of tuning. We will focus particularly on their connection (or lack thereof) with non-perturbative effects and time-varying processes and provide our opinions as to the strengths and weaknesses of ENZ films in these areas.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Johns Hopkins University

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research · National Science Foundation

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Liberal · Nat. Photonics · 2017 · 11 · 14910.1038/nphoton.2017.13 ↗
2. Kinsey · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2019 · 4 · 74210.1038/s41578-019-0133-0 ↗
3. Liberal · Science · 2017 · 358 · 154010.1126/science.aaq0459 ↗
4. Ziolkowski · Phys. Rev. E · 2001 · 64 · 05662510.1103/PhysRevE.64.056625 ↗
5. Enoch · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 21390210.1103/PhysRevLett.89.213902 ↗
6. Kim · Optica · 2016 · 3 · 33910.1364/OPTICA.3.000339 ↗
7. Yang · Nat. Photonics · 2017 · 11 · 39010.1038/nphoton.2017.64 ↗
8. Luk · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 08541110.1103/PhysRevB.90.085411 ↗
9. Liberal · Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1098910.1038/ncomms10989 ↗
10. Kinsey · Optica · 2015 · 2 · 61610.1364/OPTICA.2.000616 ↗
11. Alam · Science · 2016 · 352 · 79510.1126/science.aae0330 ↗
12. Caspani · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 116 · 23390110.1103/PhysRevLett.116.233901 ↗
13. Reshef · Nat. Rev. Mater. · 2019 · 4 · 53510.1038/s41578-019-0120-5 ↗
14. Fomra · Appl. Phys. Rev. · 2024 · 11 · 01131710.1063/5.0186961 ↗
15. Secondo · Opt. Mater. Express · 2020 · 10 · 154510.1364/OME.394111 ↗
16. Khurgin · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2021 · 15 · 200029110.1002/lpor.202000291 ↗
17. Wang · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2019 · 11 · 06406210.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.064062 ↗
18. Kane · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1957 · 1 · 24910.1016/0022-3697(57)90013-6 ↗
19. Khurgin · ACS Photonics · 2024 · 11 · 287410.1021/acsphotonics.4c00645 ↗
20. Galiffi · Adv. Photonics · 2022 · 4 · 01400210.1117/1.AP.4.1.014002 ↗
21. Caloz · IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. · 2020 · 68 · 158310.1109/TAP.2019.2944216 ↗
22. Caloz · IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. · 2020 · 68 · 156910.1109/TAP.2019.2944225 ↗
23. Khurgin · Optica · 2020 · 7 · 22610.1364/OPTICA.374788 ↗
24. Shen · 2002
25. Boyd · J. Mod. Opt. · 2009 · 56 · 190810.1080/09500340903159495 ↗
26. De Ceglia · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 15514010.1103/PhysRevB.87.155140 ↗
27. Un · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2023 · 19 · 04404310.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.044043 ↗
28. Un · ACS Photonics · 2025 · 12 · 171810.1021/acsphotonics.5c00384 ↗