Non-monotonic effect of growth pressure on the responsivity of AlGaN ultraviolet Schottky detectors
Source abstract
Abstract
Three AlGaN-based Schottky detector samples grown with varying pressure conditions are prepared and their responsivity is investigated. It is found that the responsivity of the three samples first increases and then decreases with the increase of pressure. In addition, the vacancy defect concentration increases and carbon impurities concentration decreases when the reactor pressure increases from 100 mbar to 200 mbar during the i-AlGaN layer growth. It is assumed that carbon impurities and vacancy defects play a negative role in detector’s performance, which increase the recombination of photogenerated carriers and reduce detector responsivity. The relationship between growth pressure and detector responsivity is not linear. It is necessary to select a suitable growth pressure to improve the performance of AlGaN detectors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Ga2O3 and related materials · Photocathodes and Microchannel Plates
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Taiyuan University of Technology
Funding
Shanxi-Zheda Institute of Advanced Materials and Chemical Engineering · Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences · Beijing Nova Program · Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Khan · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 44 · 719110.1143/JJAP.44.7191 ↗
2. Li · Adv. Opt. Photonics · 2018 · 10 · 4310.1364/AOP.10.000043 ↗
3. Li · Phys. B · 2010 · 405 · 99610.1016/j.physb.2009.10.040 ↗
4. Munoz · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2001 · 13 · 711510.1088/0953-8984/13/32/316 ↗
5. Dahal · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 26350510.1063/1.2752126 ↗
6. Biyikli · IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 2004 · 16 · 171810.1109/LPT.2004.829526 ↗
7. Pau · Materials Science and Engineering · 2002 · 93 · 15910.1016/S0921-5107(02)00051-X ↗
8. Rathkanthiwar · J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 121 · 16450210.1063/1.4982354 ↗
9. Wang · IEEE Sens. J. · 2015 · 15 · 474310.1109/JSEN.2015.2425657 ↗
10. Bouzid · J. Electron. Mater. · 2017 · 46 · 656310.1007/s11664-017-5696-1 ↗
11. Kadaoui · Superlattices Microstruct. · 2015 · 82 · 26910.1016/j.spmi.2015.02.007 ↗
12. Krtschil · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 226310.1063/1.1565687 ↗
13. Weimann · J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 83 · 365610.1063/1.366585 ↗
14. Speck · Phys. B · 1999 · 273274 · 2410.1016/S0921-4526(99)00399-3 ↗
15. He · Thin Solid Films · 2014 · 564 · 13510.1016/j.tsf.2014.05.045 ↗
16. Wrigh · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 92 · 257510.1063/1.1498879 ↗
17. Honda · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 51 · 04D10.1143/JJAP.51.04DF04 ↗
18. Dupasquier · 1995
19. Saarinen · MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) · 1997 · 482 · 3030
20. Warnick · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 21410910.1103/PhysRevB.84.214109 ↗
21. Puzyrev · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 910.1063/1.3524185 ↗