journal article·2022-12-01Open access

Study on the mechanically exfoliated graphene saturable absorption dependence on the number of layers and its influence on passive mode-locking erbium-doped fiber laser dynamics

F. P. R. de Freitas, D. Steinberg, H. G. Rosa, E. A. Thoroh de Souza

Optical Materials Express· Volume 12· Issue 12

Abstract

We experimentally investigated the saturable absorption influence of graphene layers with natural stacking order in an erbium-doped fiber laser passive mode-locking. Mechanically exfoliated graphene saturable absorber (MEGSA) samples, ranging from 1 to 6 layers, were fabricated preserving their natural ABA stacking order and precisely characterized by 2D band profile from Raman spectroscopy. By incorporating the samples as saturable absorbers (SA) in the fiber laser, mode-locking performances with pulse duration from 670–780 fs and bandwidth from 3.8–4.6 nm could be generated. Also, we identified a transition in the mode-locking activation mechanism from non-self-starting, for monolayer and bilayer graphene, to self-starting, for trilayer and few-layer graphene, which is a strong indicative of fast-to-slow saturable absorption response dependence on the number of graphene layers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Military Engineering Institute (IME)

Mackenzie Presbyterian University

Funding

Brazilian Army · Fundo Mackenzie de Pesquisa e Inovação · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Sibbett · Opt. Express · 2012 · 20 · 698910.1364/OE.20.006989 ↗
2. Wang · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2014 · 20 · 20010.1109/JSTQE.2014.2310707 ↗
3. Lin · Opt. Express · 2005 · 13 · 877210.1364/OPEX.13.008772 ↗
4. Ma · Appl. Phys. Rev. · 2019 · 6 · 04130410.1063/1.5099188 ↗
5. Guo · Laser & Photonics Reviews · 2019 · 13 · 180032710.1002/lpor.201800327 ↗
6. Jiang · Photonics Res. · 2020 · 8 · 7810.1364/PRJ.8.000078 ↗
7. Bonaccorso · Nat. Photonics · 2010 · 4 · 61110.1038/nphoton.2010.186 ↗
8. Castro Neto · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2009 · 81 · 10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
9. Partoens · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 07540410.1103/PhysRevB.74.075404 ↗
10. Guinea · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 24542610.1103/PhysRevB.73.245426 ↗
11. Malard · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 12542610.1103/PhysRevB.79.125426 ↗
12. Mak · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 17640410.1103/PhysRevLett.104.176404 ↗
13. Bao · Nat. Phys. · 2011 · 7 · 94810.1038/nphys2103 ↗
14. Sugawara · NPG Asia Mater. · 2018 · 10 · e46610.1038/am.2017.238 ↗
15. Huang · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2020 · 15 · 28910.1038/s41565-019-0622-8 ↗
16. Gao · Nat. Commun. · 2020 · 11 · 54610.1038/s41467-019-14022-3 ↗
17. Reina · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 3010.1021/nl801827v ↗
18. Peng · J. Eur. Opt. Soc.-Rapid Publ. · 2021 · 17 · 1610.1186/s41476-021-00163-w ↗
19. Hass · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 12550410.1103/PhysRevLett.100.125504 ↗
20. Chang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 21110210.1063/1.3521257 ↗
21. Bao · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 307710.1002/adfm.200901007 ↗
22. Bao · Nano Res. · 2011 · 4 · 29710.1007/s12274-010-0082-9 ↗
23. Sobon · J. Lightwave Technol. · 2012 · 30 · 277010.1109/JLT.2012.2207092 ↗
24. Huang · Opt. Express · 2012 · 20 · 246010.1364/OE.20.002460 ↗
25. Fu · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 2014 · 20 · 41110.1109/JSTQE.2014.2302361 ↗
26. Chen · J. Lightwave Technol. · 2015 · 33 · 440610.1109/JLT.2015.2471100 ↗
27. Rosa · Opt. Mater. Express · 2017 · 7 · 252810.1364/OME.7.002528 ↗
28. Sulimany · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2018 · 121 · 13390210.1103/PhysRevLett.121.133902 ↗
29. Martinez · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 12110710.1063/1.3641419 ↗
30. Limmer · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 21740610.1103/PhysRevLett.110.217406 ↗
31. Rosa · 2D Mater. · 2015 · 2 · 03100110.1088/2053-1583/2/3/031001 ↗
32. Park · Opt. Express · 2015 · 23 · 1980610.1364/OE.23.019806 ↗
33. Zapata · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2064410.1038/srep20644 ↗
34. Papanai · Mater. Today Commun. · 2020 · 22 · 10079510.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100795 ↗
35. Kumar · Materials · 2021 · 14 · 459010.3390/ma14164590 ↗
36. Nguyen · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 4 · 463010.1038/srep04630 ↗
37. Silva · Carbon · 2020 · 161 · 18110.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.050 ↗
38. Novoselov · Science · 2004 · 306 · 66610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
39. Castellanos-Gomez · 2D Mater. · 2014 · 1 · 01100210.1088/2053-1583/1/1/011002 ↗
40. Beams · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2015 · 27 · 08300210.1088/0953-8984/27/8/083002 ↗
41. Newson · Opt. Express · 2009 · 17 · 232610.1364/OE.17.002326 ↗
42. Zhang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 09110210.1063/1.4913607 ↗
43. Rosa · J. Lightwave Technol. · 2015 · 33 · 411810.1109/JLT.2015.2467173 ↗
44. Goto · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 525310.1021/nl402404z ↗
45. Kartner · IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. · 1998 · 4 · 15910.1109/2944.686719 ↗
46. Kim · Opt. Express · 2012 · 20 · 1505410.1364/OE.20.015054 ↗
47. Bogusławski · Opt. Express · 2015 · 23 · 2901410.1364/OE.23.029014 ↗
48. Chernysheva · IEEE J. Select. Topics Quantum Electron. · 2014 · 20 · 42510.1109/JSTQE.2014.2307757 ↗
49. Chernykh · Appl. Opt. · 2014 · 53 · 665410.1364/AO.53.006654 ↗
50. Chen · Laser Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 15 · 07510210.1088/1612-202X/aabcfe ↗
51. Wu · Appl. Opt. · 2015 · 54 · 168110.1364/AO.54.001681 ↗
52. Steinberg · IEEE Photonics J. · 2021 · 13 · 110.1109/JPHOT.2021.3061519 ↗