journal article·2026-05-21Open access

The diffusion-driven orthorhombic to tetragonal transition in YBa2Cu3O7 derived with a machine learning interatomic potential

Davide Gambino, Niccolò Di Eugenio, Jesper Byggmästar, Johan Klarbring, Daniele Torsello, Flyura Djurabekova, Francesco Laviano

npj Quantum Materials· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Defects in high-temperature superconductors such as YBa 2 Cu 3 O 7 (YBCO) critically influence their superconducting behavior, as they substantially degrade or even suppress superconductivity. With the renewed interest in cuprates for next-generation superconducting magnets operating in radiation-harsh environments such as fusion reactors and particle accelerators, accurate atomistic modeling of defects and their dynamics has become essential. Here, we present a general-purpose machine-learning interatomic potential for YBCO, based on the Atomic Cluster Expansion (ACE) method and trained on density functional theory (DFT) data, with particular emphasis on defects and their diffusion mechanisms. The potential is validated against DFT calculations of ground-state properties, defect formation energies of oxygen Frenkel pairs, and diffusion barriers for their formation. Remarkably, the potential captures the diffusion-driven orthorhombic to tetragonal transition at elevated temperatures, a transformation that is difficult to describe with empirical potentials, elucidating how the formation of oxygen Frenkel pairs in the basal plane governs this order-disorder transition. The ACE potential introduced here enables large-scale, predictive atomistic simulations of defect dynamics and transport processes in YBCO, providing a powerful tool to explore its stability, performance, and functionality under realistic operating conditions. Moreover, this work proves that machine learning interatomic potentials are suitable for studies of quaternary oxides with complex chemistry.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. Coombs, T. A. et al. High-temperature superconductors and their large-scale applications. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 1, 788–801 (2024).10.1038/s44287-024-00112-y ↗
2. Obradors, X. & Puig, T. Coated conductors for power applications: materials challenges. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27, 044003 (2014).10.1088/0953-2048/27/4/044003 ↗
3. MacManus-Driscoll, J. L. & Wimbush, S. C. Processing and application of high-temperature superconducting coated conductors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 587–604 (2021).10.1038/s41578-021-00290-3 ↗
4. Sorbom, B. N. et al. ARC: a compact, high-field, fusion nuclear science facility and demonstration power plant with demountable magnets. Fusion Eng. Des. 100, 378–405 (2015).10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.07.008 ↗
5. Vieira, R. F. et al. Design, fabrication, and assembly of the SPARC toroidal field model coil. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 34, 0600615 (2024).10.1109/TASC.2024.3356571 ↗
6. Kingham, D. & Gryaznevich, M. The spherical tokamak path to fusion power: opportunities and challenges for development via public-private partnerships. Phys. Plasmas 31, 042507 (2024).10.1063/5.0170088 ↗
7. Meschini, S. et al. Review of commercial nuclear fusion projects. Front. Energy Res. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1157394/full (2023).10.3389/fenrg.2023.1157394/full ↗
8. Li, Z. Y. et al. Development and construction of magnet system for world’s first full high temperature superconducting tokamak. Superconductivity 12, 100137 (2024).10.1016/j.supcon.2024.100137 ↗
9. Sarasola, X. et al. Progress in the design of a hybrid HTS-Nb3Sn-NbTi central solenoid for the EU demo. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 30, 1–5 (2020).10.1109/TASC.2020.2965066 ↗
10. Federici, G. et al. Relationship between magnetic field and tokamak size—a system engineering perspective and implications to fusion development. Nucl. Fusion 64, 036025 (2024).10.1088/1741-4326/ad2425 ↗
11. Bottura, L. et al. Magnets for a muon collider—needs and plans. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 34, 1–8 (2024).
12. Mariotto, S. et al. Study of HTS energy-saving superconducting magnet options for the PSI particle beam lines. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 35, 1–5 (2025).10.1109/TASC.2025.3543325 ↗
13. Giannini, L. et al. Advances in magnet and shielding designs for fusion and high energy physics applications. Fusion Eng. Des. 214, 114899 (2025).10.1016/j.fusengdes.2025.114899 ↗
14. Omori, N. E., Bobitan, A. D., Vamvakeros, A., Beale, A. M. & Jacques, S. D. M. Recent developments in X-ray diffraction/scattering computed tomography for materials science. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 381, 20220350 (2023).10.1098/rsta.2022.0350 ↗
15. Wang, Z. et al. Unraveling working and degradation mechanisms of energy storage and conversion materials at the nanoscale using synchrotron X-ray characterizations. Adv. Mater. 38, e72655 (2026).10.1002/adma.72655 ↗
16. Park, S., Jeong, Y.-H. & Yu, Y.-S. A concise review of advances in X-ray spectromicroscopy and ptychography: applications in emerging energy materials. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 43, 43–55 (2026).10.1007/s11814-024-00327-7 ↗
17. Magdy, M. A brief account of the technology significance of synchrotron radiation: a state-of-the-art angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES). Curr. Anal. Chem. 22, 771–778 (2026).10.2174/0115734110371322250417040648 ↗
18. Dong, Z. et al. Sub-nanometer depth resolution and single dopant visualization achieved by tilt-coupled multislice electron ptychography. Nat. Commun. 16, 1219 (2025).10.1038/s41467-025-56499-1 ↗
19. Suh, W., Choi, J. B., Park, K.-Y. & Chang, C. S. Development of electron ptychography from algorithms, detectors to its applications. Appl. Microsc. 55, 13 (2025).10.1186/s42649-025-00119-1 ↗
20. Bednorz, J. G. & Müller, K. A. Possible high Tc superconductivity in the Ba–La–Cu–O system. Z. Phys. B 64, 189–193 (1986).10.1007/BF01303701 ↗
21. Tsuei, C. C. & Kirtley, J. R. Pairing symmetry in cuprate superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 969–1016 (2000).10.1103/RevModPhys.72.969 ↗
22. Taillefer, L. Scattering and pairing in cuprate superconductors. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 51–70 (2010).10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-070909-104117 ↗
23. Norman, M. R. The challenge of unconventional superconductivity. Science 332, 196–200 (2011).10.1126/science.1200181 ↗
24. Scalapino, D. J. A common thread: the pairing interaction for unconventional superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383–1417 (2012).10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1383 ↗
25. Stewart, G. R. Unconventional superconductivity. Adv. Phys. 66, 75–196 (2017).10.1080/00018732.2017.1331615 ↗
26. Anderson, Z. W. et al. Gapped commensurate antiferromagnetic response in a strongly underdoped model cuprate superconductor. npj Quantum Mater. 10, 93 (2025).10.1038/s41535-025-00804-0 ↗
27. Oliviero, V. et al. Charge order near the antiferromagnetic quantum critical point in the trilayer high Tc cuprate HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ. npj Quantum Mater. 9, 75 (2024).10.1038/s41535-024-00688-6 ↗
28. Christos, M. & Sachdev, S. Emergence of nodal Bogoliubov quasiparticles across the transition from the pseudogap metal to the d-wave superconductor. npj Quantum Mater. 9, 4 (2024).10.1038/s41535-023-00608-0 ↗
29. Tallon, J. L. Oxygen in high-Tc cuprate superconductors. In (ed Narlikar, A. V.) Frontiers in Superconducting Materials, pp 295–330 https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27294-1_7 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005).10.1007/3-540-27294-1_7 ↗
30. Johnson, C. L., Bording, J. K. & Zhu, Y. Structural inhomogeneity and twinning in YBa2Cu3O7−δ superconductors: high-resolution transmission electron microscopy measurements. Phys. Rev. B 78, 014517 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevB.78.014517 ↗
31. Borovik, A. S., Malyshevsky, V. S. & Rahimov, S. V. Ion channeling investigation of oxygen sublattice in YBa2Cu3O7 crystal film. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 226, 385–391 (2004).10.1016/j.nimb.2004.06.032 ↗
32. Balatsky, A. V., Vekhter, I. & Zhu, J.-X. Impurity-induced states in conventional and unconventional superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 373–433 (2006).10.1103/RevModPhys.78.373 ↗
33. Feighan, J. P. F., Kursumovic, A. & MacManus-Driscoll, J. L. Materials design for artificial pinning centres in superconductor PLD coated conductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 123001 (2017).10.1088/1361-6668/aa90d1 ↗
34. Obradors, X. & Puig, T. Pin the vortex on the superconductor. Nat. Mater. 23, 1311–1312 (2024).10.1038/s41563-024-01990-1 ↗
35. Puig, T., Gutierrez, J. & Obradors, X. Impact of high growth rates on the microstructure and vortex pinning of high-temperature superconducting coated conductors. Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 132–148 (2024).10.1038/s42254-023-00663-3 ↗
36. Ruiz, H. S. et al. Critical current density in advanced superconductors. Prog. Mater. Sci. 155, 101492 (2026).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2025.101492 ↗
37. Nücker, N., Fink, J., Fuggle, J. C., Durham, P. J. & Temmerman, W. M. Evidence for holes on oxygen sites in the high-Tc superconductors La2−xSrxCuO4 and YBa2Cu3O7−y. Phys. Rev. B 37, 5158–5163 (1988).10.1103/PhysRevB.37.5158 ↗
38. Arpaia, R. et al. Dynamical charge density fluctuations pervading the phase diagram of a Cu-based high-Tc superconductor. Science 365, 906–910 (2019).10.1126/science.aav1315 ↗
39. Legris, A., Rullier-Albenque, F., Radeva, E. & Lejay, P. Effects of electron irradiation on YBa2Cu307−δ superconductor. J. Phys. I 3, 1605–1615 (1993).
40. Unterrainer, R., Fischer, D. X., Lorenz, A. & Eisterer, M. Recovering the performance of irradiated high-temperature superconductors for use in fusion magnets. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 35, 04LT01 (2022).10.1088/1361-6668/ac4636 ↗
41. Unterrainer, R. et al. Responsibility of small defects for the low radiation tolerance of coated conductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 37, 105008 (2024).10.1088/1361-6668/ad70db ↗
42. Fischer, D. X. et al. Influence of irradiation temperature on REBCO tape degradation. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 38, 055019 (2025).10.1088/1361-6668/ada112 ↗
43. Mundet, B. et al. Local strain-driven migration of oxygen vacancies to apical sites in YBa2Cu3O7−x. Nanoscale 12, 5922–5931 (2020).10.1039/D0NR00666A ↗
44. Torsello, D. et al. Radiation environment and damage of HTS magnets in an ARC-like reactor. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 35, 1–6 (2025).10.1109/TASC.2024.3516732 ↗
45. Torsello, D., Gambino, D., Gozzelino, L., Trotta, A. & Laviano, F. Expected radiation environment and damage for YBCO tapes in compact fusion reactors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 36, 014003 (2023).10.1088/1361-6668/aca369 ↗
46. Torsello, D. et al. Roadmap for the investigation of irradiation effects in HTS for fusion. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 38, 053501 (2025).10.1088/1361-6668/adce40 ↗
47. Jorgensen, J. D. et al. Oxygen ordering and the orthorhombic-to-tetragonal phase transition in YBa2Cu3O7−x. Phys. Rev. B 36, 3608–3616 (1987).10.1103/PhysRevB.36.3608 ↗
48. Schuller, I. K. et al. Structural phase transition in YBa2Cu3O7−δ: the role of dimensionality for high temperature superconductivity. Solid State Commun. 63, 385–388 (1987).10.1016/0038-1098(87)91134-3 ↗
49. Bonetti, E., Campari, E. G., Mattioli, P. & Zingaro, A. Stoichiometry dependence of oxygen anelastic relaxation in YBa2Cu3O7−x and the orthorhombic-to-tetragonal phase transition. J. Alloy. Compd. 211-212, 314–317 (1994).10.1016/0925-8388(94)90510-X ↗
50. Chaplot, S. L. Molecular-dynamics simulation of YBa2Cu3O7 at high temperatures. Phase Transit. 19, 49–59 (1989).10.1080/01411598908242380 ↗
51. Chaplot, S. L. Phonon dispersion relation in YBa2Cu3O7. Phys. Rev. B 37, 7435–7442 (1988).10.1103/PhysRevB.37.7435 ↗
52. Chaplot, S. L. Interatomic potential, phonon spectrum, and molecular-dynamics simulation up to 1300 K in YBa2Cu3O7−δ. Phys. Rev. B 42, 2149–2154 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevB.42.2149 ↗
53. Gray, R. L., Rushton, M. J. D. & Murphy, S. T. Molecular dynamics simulations of radiation damage in YBa2Cu3O7. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 35, 035010 (2022).10.1088/1361-6668/ac47dc ↗
54. Dickson, A., Gilbert, M. R., Nguyen-Manh, D. & Murphy, S. T. Threshold displacement energies of oxygen in YBa2Cu3O7: a multi-physics analysis. J. Nucl. Mater. 618, 156239 (2026).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2025.156239 ↗
55. Behler, J. Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 170901 (2016).10.1063/1.4966192 ↗
56. Friederich, P., Häse, F., Proppe, J. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Machine-learned potentials for next-generation matter simulations. Nat. Mater. 20, 750–761 (2021).10.1038/s41563-020-0777-6 ↗
57. Mishin, Y. Machine-learning interatomic potentials for materials science. Acta Mater. 214, 116980 (2021).10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116980 ↗
58. Deringer, V. L., Caro, M. A. & Csányi, G. Machine learning interatomic potentials as emerging tools for materials science. Adv. Mater. 31, 1902765 (2019).10.1002/adma.201902765 ↗
59. Bochkarev, A. et al. Efficient parametrization of the atomic cluster expansion. Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 013804 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.013804 ↗
60. Loutati, A., Sohn, Y. J. & Tietz, F. Phase-field determination of NaSICON materials in the quaternary system Na2O-P2O5-SiO2-ZrO2: the series Na3Zr3−xSi2PxO11.5+x/2. ChemPhysChem 22, 995–1007 (2021).10.1002/cphc.202100032 ↗
61. Attarian, S., Morgan, D. & Szlufarska, I. Studies of Ni-Cr complexation in FLiBe molten salt using machine learning interatomic potentials. J. Mol. Liq. 400, 124521 (2024).10.1016/j.molliq.2024.124521 ↗
62. Liu, J., Byggmästar, J., Fan, Z., Qian, P. & Su, Y. Large-scale machine-learning molecular dynamics simulation of primary radiation damage in tungsten. Phys. Rev. B 108, 054312 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevB.108.054312 ↗
63. Leimeroth, N., Rohrer, J. & Albe, K. General purpose potential for glassy and crystalline phases of Cu-Zr alloys based on the ACE formalism. Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 043602 (2024).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.043602 ↗
64. Liu, Y., He, X. & Mo, Y. Discrepancies and error evaluation metrics for machine learning interatomic potentials. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 174 (2023).10.1038/s41524-023-01123-3 ↗
65. Fellman, A., Byggmästar, J., Granberg, F., Nordlund, K. & Djurabekova, F. Fast and accurate machine-learned interatomic potentials for large-scale simulations of Cu, Al, and Ni. Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 053807 (2025).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.9.053807 ↗
66. Poul, M., Huber, L. & Neugebauer, J. Automated generation of structure datasets for machine learning potentials and alloys. npj Comput. Mater. 11, 174 (2025).10.1038/s41524-025-01669-4 ↗
67. Drautz, R. Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials. Phys. Rev. B 99, 014104 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.99.014104 ↗
68. Drautz, R. Atomic cluster expansion of scalar, vectorial, and tensorial properties including magnetism and charge transfer. Phys. Rev. B 102, 024104 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevB.102.024104 ↗
69. Cowley, J. M. An approximate theory of order in alloys. Phys. Rev. 77, 669–675 (1950).10.1103/PhysRev.77.669 ↗
70. Stukowski, A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO—the Open Visualization Tool. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2009).10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
71. Ziegler, J. F. & Biersack, J. P. The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter, pp 93–129 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8103-1_3. (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1985).10.1007/978-1-4615-8103-1_3 ↗
72. Hjorth Larsen, A. et al. The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. 29, 273002 (2017).
73. Hirel, P. Atomsk: a tool for manipulating and converting atomic data files. Comput. Phys. Commun. 197, 212–219 (2015).10.1016/j.cpc.2015.07.012 ↗
74. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
75. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 – 50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
76. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
77. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
78. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
79. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
80. Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976).10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
81. Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).10.1063/1.1329672 ↗
82. Henkelman, G. & Jónsson, H. Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9978–9985 (2000).10.1063/1.1323224 ↗
83. Lysogorskiy, Y. et al. Performant implementation of the atomic cluster expansion (PACE) and application to copper and silicon. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 1–12 (2021).10.1038/s41524-021-00559-9 ↗
84. Thompson, A. P. et al. LAMMPS—a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗