Evolution of the low-temperature Fermi surface of superconducting FeSe1−xSx across a nematic phase transition
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The existence of a nematic phase transition in iron-chalcogenide superconductors poses an intriguing question about its impact on superconductivity. To understand the nature of this unique quantum phase transition, it is essential to study how the electronic structure changes across this transition at low temperatures. Here, we investigate the evolution of the Fermi surfaces and electronic interactions across the nematic phase transition of FeSe1−xSx using Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations in high magnetic fields up to 45 T in the low temperature regime down to 0.4 K. Most of the Fermi surfaces of FeSe1−xSx monotonically increase in size except for a prominent low frequency oscillation associated with a small, but highly mobile band, which disappears at the nematic phase boundary near x ~ 0.17, indicative of a topological Lifshitz transition. The quasiparticle masses are larger inside the nematic phase, indicative of a strongly correlated state, but they become suppressed outside it. The experimentally observed changes in the Fermi surface topology, together with the varying degree of electronic correlations, will change the balance of electronic interactions in the multi-band system FeSe1−xSx and promote different kz-dependent superconducting pairing channels inside and outside the nematic phase.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron-based superconductors research · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Fernandes, R. M., Chubukov, A. V. & Schmalian, J. What drives nematic order in iron-based superconductors? Nat. Phys. 10, 97–104 (2014).10.1038/nphys2877 ↗
2. Schattner, Y., Lederer, S., Kivelson, S. A. & Berg, E. Ising nematic quantum critical point in a metal: a Monte Carlo Study. Phys. Rev. X 6, 031028 (2016).
3. Watson, M. D. et al. Emergence of the nematic electronic state in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 91, 155106 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155106 ↗
4. Watson, M. D. et al. Evidence for unidirectional nematic bond ordering in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 94, 201107 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.201107 ↗
5. Sprau, P. O. et al. Discovery of orbital-selective cooper pairing in FeSe. Science 357, 75 (2016).10.1126/science.aal1575 ↗
6. Wen, C. H. P. et al. Anomalous correlation effects and unique phase diagram of electron-doped FeSe revealed by photoemission spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 7, 10840 (2016).10.1038/ncomms10840 ↗
7. Terashima, T. et al. Fermi surface reconstruction in FeSe under high pressure. Phys. Rev. B 93, 094505 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.094505 ↗
8. Burrard-Lucas, M. et al. Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature of FeSe by intercalation of a molecular spacer layer. Nat. Mater. 12, 15–19 (2013).10.1038/nmat3464 ↗
9. Watson, M. D. et al. Suppression of orbital ordering by chemical pressure in FeSe1−xSx. Phys. Rev. B 92, 121108 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.121108 ↗
10. Hosoi, S. et al. Nematic quantum critical point without magnetism in FeSe1−xSx superconductors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 8139 (2016).10.1073/pnas.1605806113 ↗
11. Reiss, P. et al. Suppression of electronic correlations by chemical pressure from FeSe to FeS. Phys. Rev. B 96, 121103 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.121103 ↗
12. Terashima, T. et al. Pressure-induced antiferromagnetic transition and phase diagram in FeSe. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 84, 063701 (2015).10.7566/JPSJ.84.063701 ↗
13. Knöner, S. et al. Resistivity and magnetoresistance of FeSe single crystals under helium-gas pressure. Phys. Rev. B 91, 174510 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.174510 ↗
14. Kothapalli, K. et al. Strong cooperative coupling of pressure-induced magnetic order and nematicity in FeSe. Nat. Commun. 7, 12728 (2016).10.1038/ncomms12728 ↗
15. Sun, J. P. et al. Dome-shaped magnetic order competing with high-temperature superconductivity at high pressures in FeSe. Nat. Commun. 7, 12146 (2016).10.1038/ncomms12146 ↗
16. Matsuura, K. et al. Maximizing T c by tuning nematicity and magnetism in FeSe1−xSx superconductors. Nat. Commun. 8, 1143 (2017).10.1038/s41467-017-01277-x ↗
17. Shoenberg, D. Magnetic Oscillations in Metals. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1984).10.1017/CBO9780511897870 ↗
18. Terashima, T. et al. Anomalous Fermi surface in FeSe seen by Shubnikov-de Haas oscillation measurements. Phys. Rev. B 90, 144517 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.144517 ↗
19. Watson, M. D., Haghighirad, A. A., Rhodes, L. C., Hoesch, M. & Kim, T. K. Electronic anisotropies revealed by detwinned angle-resolved photo-emission spectroscopy measurements of FeSe. New J. Phys. 19, 103021 (2017).10.1088/1367-2630/aa8a04 ↗
20. Coldea, A. I. & Watson, M. D. The key ingredients of the electronic structure of FeSe. Annu. Rev. Cond. Matt. Phys. 9, 125 (2018).10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-033117-054137 ↗
21. Watson, M. D. et al. Dichotomy between the hole and electron behavior in multiband superconductor FeSe probed by ultrahigh magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 027006 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.027006 ↗
22. Zhang, Y. et al. Distinctive orbital anisotropy observed in the nematic state of a FeSe thin film. Phys. Rev. B 94, 115153 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.115153 ↗
23. Putzke, C. et al. de Haas-van Alphen Study of the Fermi Surfaces of Superconducting LiFeP and LiFeAs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 047002 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.047002 ↗
24. Shishido, H. et al. Evolution of the Fermi surface of BaFe2(As1−xPx)2 on entering the superconducting dome. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 1 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.057008 ↗
25. Arnold, B. J. et al. Nesting of electron and hole Fermi surfaces in nonsuperconducting BaFe2P2. Phys. Rev. B 83, 220504 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.83.220504 ↗
26. Coldea, A. I. et al. Fermi surface of superconducting LaFePO determined from quantum oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 216402 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.216402 ↗
27. Audouard, A. et al. Quantum oscillations and upper critical magnetic field of the iron-based superconductor FeSe. Europhys. Lett. 109, 27003 (2015).10.1209/0295-5075/109/27003 ↗
28. Yamaji, K. On the angle dependence of the magnetoresistance in quasi-two-dimensional organic superconductors. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 58, 1520 (1989).10.1143/JPSJ.58.1520 ↗
29. Lifshitz, I. Anomalies of electron characteristics of a metal in the high pressure region. JETP 11, 1130 (1960).
30. Ovchenkov, Y. A. et al. Highly mobile carriers in orthorhombic phases of iron-based superconductors FeSe1xSx. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 035017 (2017).10.1088/1361-6668/aa570a ↗
31. Sun, Y., Pyon, S. & Tamegai, T. Electron carriers with possible Dirac-cone-like dispersion in FeSe1−xSx (x = 0 and 0:14) single crystals triggered by structural transition. Phys. Rev. B 93, 104502 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.104502 ↗
32. Kasahara, S. et al. Nontrivial orbital Berry phase in FeSe1−xSx superconductors. (in preparation).
33. Reiss, P. et al. Quenched nematic criticality separating two superconducting domes in an iron-based superconductor under pressure. submitted (2018).
34. Fanfarillo, L. et al. Orbital-dependent Fermi surface shrinking as a fingerprint of nematicity in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 94, 155138 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155138 ↗
35. Wang, L. et al. Superconductivity-enhanced nematicity and s+d gap symmetry in Fe(Se1−xSx). Phys Status Solidi (b) 254, 1–6, 1600153 (2016).10.1002/pssb.201600153 ↗
36. Sato, Y. Abrupt change of the superconducting gap structure at the nematic critical point in FeSe1–xSx. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 1127–1231 (2018).10.1073/pnas.1717331115 ↗
37. Walmsley, P. et al. Quasiparticle mass enhancement close to the quantum critical point in BaFe2(As1−xPx)2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 257002 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.257002 ↗
38. Terashima, T. et al. Upper critical field and quantum oscillations in tetragonal superconducting FeS. Phys. Rev. B 94, 100503 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.100503 ↗
39. Liu, C. et al. Evidence for a Lifshitz transition in electron-doped iron arsenic superconductors at the onset of superconductivity. Nat. Phys. 6, 419–423 (2010).10.1038/nphys1656 ↗
40. Ye, Z. R. et al. Simultaneous emergence of superconductivity, inter-pocket scattering and nematic fluctuation in potassium-coated FeSe superconductor. Preprint at arXiv:1512.02526 (2015).
41. Shi, X. et al. Enhanced superconductivity accompanying a Lifshitz transition in electron-doped FeSe monolayer. Nat. Comm. 8, 14988 (2017).10.1038/ncomms14988 ↗
42. Mandal, S., Cohen, R. E. & Haule, K. Strong pressure-dependent electron-phonon coupling in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 89, 220502 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.220502 ↗
43. Skornyakov, S. L., Anisimov, V. I., Vollhardt, D. & Leonov, I. Correlation strength, Lifshitz transition, and the emergence of a two-dimensional to three-dimensional crossover in FeSe under pressure. Phys. Rev. B 97, 115165 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.97.115165 ↗
44. Ptok, A., Kapcia, K. J., Cichy, A., Oleś, A. M. & Piekarz, P. Magnetic Lifshitz transition and its consequences in multi-band iron-based superconductors. Sci. Rep. 7, 41979 (2017).10.1038/srep41979 ↗
45. Watson, M. D. et al. Formation of Hubbard-like bands as a fingerprint of strong electron-electron interactions in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 95, 081106 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.95.081106 ↗
46. Chubukov, A. V., Khodas, M. & Fernandes, R. M. Magnetism, superconductivity, and spontaneous orbital order in iron-based superconductors: Which comes first and why? Phys. Rev. X 6, 041045 (2016).
47. Mukherjee, S., Kreisel, A., Hirschfeld, P. J. & Andersen, B. M. Model of electronic structure and superconductivity in orbitally ordered FeSe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 026402 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.026402 ↗
48. Yamakawa, Y., Onari, S. & Kontani, H. Nematicity and magnetism in FeSe and other families of Fe-based superconductors. Phys. Rev. X 6, 021032 (2016).
49. Wiecki, P. et al. Persistent correlation between superconductivity and antiferromagnetic fluctuations near a nematic quantum critical point in FeSe1−xSx. Phys. Rev. B 98, 020507 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.98.020507 ↗
50. Hanaguri, T. et al. Two distinct superconducting pairing states divided by the nematic end point in FeSe1−xSx. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar6419 (2018).10.1126/sciadv.aar6419 ↗
51. Lifshitz, I. & Kosevich, A. On the theory of the Shubnikov-De Haas effect. Sov. Phys. JETP 2, 636 (1956).