journal article·2019-08

Online Tools for Uncertainty Quantification in nanoHUB

Saaketh Desai, Martin Hunt, Alejandro Strachan

JOM· Volume 71· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. E.B. Tadmor and R.E. Miller, Modeling Materials: Continuum, Atomistic and Multiscale Techniques (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).10.1017/CBO9781139003582 ↗
2. D.J. Luscher, D.L. McDowell, and C.A. Bronkhorst, Int. J. Plast. 26, 1248 (2010).10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.05.006 ↗
3. A.M. Cuitiño, L. Stainier, G. Wang, A. Strachan, T. Çağin, W.A. Goddard, M. Ortiz, and J. Comput-Aid, Mater. Des. 8, 127 (2001).
4. M. Koslowski and A. Strachan, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96, 1161 (2011).10.1016/j.ress.2010.11.011 ↗
5. M. Hunt, B. Haley, M. McLennan, M. Koslowski, J. Murthy, and A. Strachan, Comput. Phys. Commun. 194, 97 (2015).10.1016/j.cpc.2015.04.011 ↗
6. S. Wojtkiewicz, M. Eldred, R. Field, Jr, A. Urbina, and J. Red-Horse, in 19th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference (2001), p. 1455.
7. B.M. Adams, W. Bohnhoff, K. Dalbey, J. Eddy, M. Eldred, D. Gay, K. Haskell, P.D. Hough, and L. P. Swiler, Sandia National Laboratories, Tech. Rep. SAND2010-2183 (2009).
8. https://nanohub.org . Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
9. A. Strachan, G. Klimeck, and M. Lundstrom, Comput. Sci. Eng. 12, 12 (2010).10.1109/MCSE.2010.38 ↗
10. https://nanohub.org/usage . Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
11. https://nanohub.org/resources/new . Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
12. S. Plimpton, J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
13. D. Gaston, C. Newman, G. Hansen, and D. Lebrun-Grandie, Nucl. Eng. Des. 239, 1768 (2009).10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.05.021 ↗
14. P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G.L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, and I. Dabo, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
15. X. Gonze, J.-M. Beuken, R. Caracas, F. Detraux, M. Fuchs, G.-M. Rignanese, L. Sindic, M. Verstraete, G. Zerah, and F. Jollet, Comput. Mater. Sci. 25, 478 (2002).10.1016/S0927-0256(02)00325-7 ↗
16. M. McLennan and R. Kennell, Comput. Sci. Eng. 12, 48 (2010).10.1109/MCSE.2010.41 ↗
17. M. McLennan, Rappture Bootcamp: Building and Deploying Tools (2012), https://nanohub.org/resources/14671 .
18. T. Kluyver, et al., in Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Electronic Publishing (2016), pp. 87–90.
19. https://jupyter.org . Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
20. L. Bergamasco, M. Fasano, E. Chiavazzo, P. Asinari, A. Cardellini, and M. Morciano (2017). https://nanohub.org/resources/tcnt , https://doi.org/10.21981/d3rv0d32v10.21981/d3rv0d32v ↗
21. J.C.V. Gastelum, A. Strachan, and S. Desai (2019). https://nanohub.org/resources/mseml , https://doi.org/10.21981/9qjn-7n65 .10.21981/9qjn-7n65 ↗
22. M. Hunt, B.P. Haley, J. Ebinger, and A. Strachan (2015). https://nanohub.org/resources/bayes , https://doi.org/10.21981/d3h12v838 .10.21981/d3h12v838 ↗
23. S. Langer, R. Edwin García, and A. Reid (2016). https://nanohub.org/resources/oof2 , https://doi.org/10.21981/d31z41t94 .10.21981/d31z41t94 ↗
24. https://nanohub.org/infrastructure/rappture/wiki/rappture_xml_elements . Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
25. A. Strachan, T. Çağin, and W.A. Goddard III, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15084 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.60.15084 ↗
26. A.P. Thompson, L.P. Swiler, C.R. Trott, S.M. Foiles, and G.J. Tucker, J. Comput. Phys. 285, 316 (2015).10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.018 ↗
27. W.J. Szlachta, A.P. Bartók, and G. Csányi, Phys. Rev. B 90, 104108 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.104108 ↗
28. S. Desai and A. Strachan (2019). https://nanohub.org/resources/dakotacalibrate , https://doi.org/10.21981/4q55-ft75 .10.21981/4q55-ft75 ↗
29. https://github.com/hubzero/hublib . Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
30. M.C. Kennedy and A. O’Hagan, J. R. Stat. Soc. B 63, 425 (2001).10.1111/1467-9868.00294 ↗
31. J. Snoek, H. Larochelle, and R.P. Adams, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (2012), pp. 2951–2959.
32. S.L. Frederiksen, K.W. Jacobsen, K.S. Brown, and J.P. Sethna, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 165501 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.165501 ↗
33. S. Longbottom and P. Brommer, ArXiv Preprint arXiv:1812.00863 (2018).
34. M. Wen, J. Li, P. Brommer, R.S. Elliott, J.P. Sethna, and E.B. Tadmor, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 25, 014001 (2016).10.1088/0965-0393/25/1/014001 ↗
35. A. Sutton and J. Chen, Philos. Mag. Lett. 61, 139 (1990).10.1080/09500839008206493 ↗
36. P. Haas, F. Tran, and P. Blaha, Phys. Rev. B 79, 085104 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.79.085104 ↗
37. P. Philipsen and E. Baerends, Phys. Rev. B 54, 5326 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.5326 ↗
38. Y. Mishin, M. Mehl, D. Papaconstantopoulos, A. Voter, and J. Kress, Phys. Rev. B 63, 224106 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
39. H. Polatoglou, M. Methfessel, and M. Scheffler, Phys. Rev. B 48, 1877 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.48.1877 ↗
40. K. Choudhary, G. Cheon, E. Reed, and F. Tavazza, Phys. Rev. B 98, 014107 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.98.014107 ↗
41. S. Desai and A. Strachan (2019). https://nanohub.org/resources/calibdriver , https://doi.org/10.21981/9xq9-k306 .10.21981/9xq9-k306 ↗
42. A. Strachan, S. Mahadevan, V. Hombal, and L. Sun, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 21, 065009 (2013).10.1088/0965-0393/21/6/065009 ↗
43. D. Xiu and G.E. Karniadakis, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24, 619 (2002).10.1137/S1064827501387826 ↗
44. M.D. McKay, R.J. Beckman, and W.J. Conover, Technometrics 42, 55 (2000).10.1080/00401706.2000.10485979 ↗
45. M.D. Morris, Technometrics 33, 161 (1991).10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804 ↗
46. F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, and A. Saltelli, Environ. Model. Softw. 22, 1509 (2007).10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.10.004 ↗
47. A. Ritchey (2016) Composite laminate analysis. https://nanohub.org/resources/complam , https://doi.org/10.21981/d33x83m8k .10.21981/d33x83m8k ↗
48. G. Javier, U. Kamran, D.M. Guzman, A. Strachan, and P. Liao (2017) DFT material properties simulator. https://nanohub.org/resources/dftmatprop , https://doi.org/10.21981/d30g3h12q .10.21981/d30g3h12q ↗
49. A.E. Mattsson, P.A. Schultz, M.P. Desjarlais, T.R. Mattsson, and K. Leung, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 13, R1 (2004).10.1088/0965-0393/13/1/R01 ↗