Electronic and magnetic properties of the RuX3 (X = Cl, Br, I) family: two siblings—and a cousin?
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Motivated by reports of metallic behavior in the recently synthesized RuI3, in contrast to the Mott-insulating nature of the actively discussed α-RuCl3, as well as RuBr3, we present a detailed comparative analysis of the electronic and magnetic properties of this family of trihalides. Using a combination of first-principles calculations and effective-model considerations, we conclude that RuI3, similarly to the other two members, is most probably on the verge of a Mott insulator, but with much smaller magnetic moments and strong magnetic frustration. We predict the ideal pristine crystal of RuI3 to have a nearly vanishing conventional nearest-neighbor Heisenberg interaction and to be a quantum spin liquid candidate of a possibly different kind than the Kitaev spin liquid. In order to understand the apparent contradiction to the reported resistivity ρ, we analyze the experimental evidence for all three compounds and propose a scenario for the observed metallicity in existing samples of RuI3. Furthermore, for the Mott insulator RuBr3, we obtain a magnetic Hamiltonian of a similar form to that in the much-discussed α-RuCl3 and show that this Hamiltonian is in agreement with experimental evidence in RuBr3.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Condensed Matter Physics · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials · Organic and Molecular Conductors Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Kitaev, A. Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond. Ann. Phys. 321, 2–111 (2006).10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005 ↗
2. Jackeli, G. & Khaliullin, G. Mott insulators in the strong spin–orbit coupling limit: from Heisenberg to a quantum compass and Kitaev models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.017205 ↗
3. Plumb, K. W. et al. α-RuCl3: a spin-orbit assisted Mott insulator on a honeycomb lattice. Phys. Rev. B 90, 041112 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.041112 ↗
4. Johnson, R. D. et al. Monoclinic crystal structure of α-RuCl3 and the zigzag antiferromagnetic ground state. Phys. Rev. B 92, 235119 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.235119 ↗
5. Zhou, X. et al. Angle-resolved photoemission study of the Kitaev candidate α-RuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 94, 161106 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.161106 ↗
6. Rau, J. G., Lee, E. K.-H. & Kee, H.-Y. Generic spin model for the honeycomb iridates beyond the Kitaev limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 077204 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.077204 ↗
7. Kim, H.-S. & Kee, H.-Y. Crystal structure and magnetism in α-RuCl3: an ab initio study. Phys. Rev. B 93, 155143 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.155143 ↗
8. Winter, S. M., Li, Y., Jeschke, H. O. & Valentí, R. Challenges in design of Kitaev materials: magnetic interactions from competing energy scales. Phys. Rev. B 93, 214431 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.214431 ↗
9. Cao, H. B. et al. Low-temperature crystal and magnetic structure of α-RuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 93, 134423 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.134423 ↗
10. Banerjee, A. et al. Neutron scattering in the proximate quantum spin liquid α-RuCl3. Science 356, 1055–1059 (2017).10.1126/science.aah6015 ↗
11. Sandilands, L. J., Tian, Y., Plumb, K. W., Kim, Y.-J. & Burch, K. S. Scattering continuum and possible fractionalized excitations in α-RuCl3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 147201 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.147201 ↗
12. Nasu, J., Knolle, J., Kovrizhin, D. L., Motome, Y. & Moessner, R. Fermionic response from fractionalization in an insulating two-dimensional magnet. Nat. Phys. 12, 912–915 (2016).10.1038/nphys3809 ↗
13. Do, S.-H. et al. Majorana fermions in the Kitaev quantum spin system α-RuCl3. Nat. Phys. 13, 1079–1084 (2017).10.1038/nphys4264 ↗
14. Widmann, S. et al. Thermodynamic evidence of fractionalized excitations in α-RuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 99, 094415 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.99.094415 ↗
15. Sears, J. A., Zhao, Y., Xu, Z., Lynn, J. W. & Kim, Y.-J. Phase diagram of α-RuCl3 in an in-plane magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B 95, 180411 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.95.180411 ↗
16. Banerjee, A. et al. Excitations in the field-induced quantum spin liquid state of α-RuCl3. npj Quantum Mater. 3, 8 (2018).10.1038/s41535-018-0079-2 ↗
17. Kasahara, Y. et al. Majorana quantization and half-integer thermal quantum Hall effect in a Kitaev spin liquid. Nature 559, 227 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0274-0 ↗
18. Hentrich, R. et al. Unusual phonon heat transport in α-RuCl3: strong spin–phonon scattering and field-induced spin gap. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 117204 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.117204 ↗
19. Winter, S. M. et al. Breakdown of magnons in a strongly spin-orbital coupled magnet. Nat. Commun. 8, 1152 (2017).10.1038/s41467-017-01177-0 ↗
20. Hentrich, R. et al. High-field thermal transport properties of the Kitaev quantum magnet α-RuCl3: evidence for low-energy excitations beyond the critical field. Phys. Rev. B 102, 235155 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevB.102.235155 ↗
21. Sahasrabudhe, A. et al. High-field quantum disordered state in α-RuCl3: spin flips, bound states, and multiparticle continuum. Phys. Rev. B 101, 140410 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevB.101.140410 ↗
22. Chern, L. E., Zhang, E. Z. & Kim, Y. B. Sign structure of thermal hall conductivity and topological magnons for in-plane field polarized Kitaev magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 147201 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.147201 ↗
23. Czajka, P. et al. Oscillations of the thermal conductivity in the spin-liquid state of α-RuCl3. Nat. Phys. 17, 915–919 (2021).10.1038/s41567-021-01243-x ↗
24. Lefrançois, É. et al. Evidence of a phonon Hall effect in the Kitaev spin liquid candidate α-RuCl3. Phys. Rev. X 12, 021025 (2022).
25. Imai, Y. et al. Zigzag magnetic order in the Kitaev spin-liquid candidate material RuBr3 with a honeycomb lattice. Phys. Rev. B 105, L041112 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L041112 ↗
26. Nawa, K. et al. Strongly electron-correlated semimetal RuI3 with a layered honeycomb structure. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90, 123703 (2021).10.7566/JPSJ.90.123703 ↗
27. Ni, D., Gui, X., Powderly, K. M. & Cava, R. J. Honeycomb-structure RuI3, a new quantum material related to α-RuCl3. Adv. Mater. 34, 2106831 (2022).10.1002/adma.202106831 ↗
28. Jaramillo, R., Ha, S. D., Silevitch, D. M. & Ramanathan, S. Origins of bad-metal conductivity and the insulator–metal transition in the rare-earth nickelates. Nat. Phys. 10, 304–307 (2014).10.1038/nphys2907 ↗
29. Little, A. et al. Antiferromagnetic resonance and terahertz continuum in α-RuCl3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 227201 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.227201 ↗
30. Gati, E. et al. Effects of disorder on the pressure-induced Mott transition in κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN)2]Cl. Crystals 8, 38 (2018).10.3390/cryst8010038 ↗
31. Tanaka, O. et al. Thermodynamic evidence for a field-angle-dependent Majorana gap in a Kitaev spin liquid. Nat. Phys. 18, 429–435 (2022).10.1038/s41567-021-01488-6 ↗
32. Sears, J. A. et al. Magnetic order in α-RuCl3: a honeycomb-lattice quantum magnet with strong spin–orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 91, 144420 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.144420 ↗
33. Li, Y., Winter, S. M., Kaib, D. A. S., Riedl, K. & Valentí, R. Modified Curie–Weiss law for jeff magnets. Phys. Rev. B 103, L220408 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L220408 ↗
34. Winter, S. M. et al. Models and materials for generalized Kitaev magnetism. J. Condens. Matter Phys. 29, 493002 (2017).10.1088/1361-648X/aa8cf5 ↗
35. Laurell, P. & Okamoto, S. Dynamical and thermal magnetic properties of the Kitaev spin liquid candidate α-RuCl3. npj Quantum Mater. 5, 2 (2020).10.1038/s41535-019-0203-y ↗
36. Sears, J. A. et al. Ferromagnetic Kitaev interaction and the origin of large magnetic anisotropy in α-RuCl3. Nat. Phys. 16, 837–840 (2020).10.1038/s41567-020-0874-0 ↗
37. Suzuki, H. et al. Proximate ferromagnetic state in the Kitaev model material α-RuCl3. Nat. Commun. 12, 4512 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-24722-4 ↗
38. Kaib, D. A. S., Biswas, S., Riedl, K., Winter, S. M. & Valentí, R. Magnetoelastic coupling and effects of uniaxial strain in α-RuCl3 from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 103, L140402 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevB.103.L140402 ↗
39. Kim, H.-S. Spin-orbit-entangled nature of magnetic moments and Kitaev magnetism in layered halides. Appl. Sci. Converg. Technol. 30, 191–194 (2021).10.5757/ASCT.2021.30.6.191 ↗
40. Zhang, Y., Lin, L.-F., Moreo, A. & Dagotto, E. Theoretical study of the crystal and electronic properties of α-RuI3. Phys. Rev. B 105, 085107 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevB.105.085107 ↗
41. Park, S.-Y. et al. Emergence of the isotropic Kitaev honeycomb lattice with two-dimensional Ising universality in α-RuCl3. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05690 (2016).
42. Eichstaedt, C. et al. Deriving models for the Kitaev spin-liquid candidate material α-RuCl3 from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 100, 075110 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.100.075110 ↗
43. Sandilands, L. J. et al. Spin–orbit excitations and electronic structure of the putative Kitaev magnet α-RuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 93, 075144 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.075144 ↗
44. Bachus, S. et al. Thermodynamic perspective on field-induced behavior of α-RuCl3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 097203 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.097203 ↗
45. Riedl, K., Li, Y., Valentí, R. & Winter, S. M. Ab initio approaches for low-energy spin Hamiltonians. Phys. Status Solidi B 256, 1800684 (2019).10.1002/pssb.201800684 ↗
46. Stavropoulos, P. P., Liu, X. & Kee, H.-Y. Magnetic anisotropy in spin-3/2 with heavy ligand in honeycomb Mott insulators: application to CrI3. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013216 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013216 ↗
47. Rousochatzakis, I., Reuther, J., Thomale, R., Rachel, S. & Perkins, N. B. Phase diagram and quantum order by disorder in the Kitaev K1−K2 honeycomb magnet. Phys. Rev. X 5, 041035 (2015).
48. Rusnačko, J., Gotfryd, D. & Chaloupka, J. Kitaev-like honeycomb magnets: global phase behavior and emergent effective models. Phys. Rev. B 99, 064425 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.99.064425 ↗
49. Chaloupka, J. & Khaliullin, G. Magnetic anisotropy in the Kitaev model systems Na2IrO3 and RuCl3. Phys. Rev. B 94, 064435 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.064435 ↗
50. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
51. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
52. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
53. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
54. Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Madsen, G. K. H., Kvasnicka, D. & Luitz, J. WIEN2k, an Augmented Plane Wave Plus Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties (Technische Universität Wien, Austria, 2001).
55. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
56. Anisimov, V. I., Solovyev, I. V., Korotin, M. A., Czyżyk, M. T. & Sawatzky, G. A. Density-functional theory and NiO photoemission spectra. Phys. Rev. B 48, 16929–16934 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.48.16929 ↗
57. Aryasetiawan, F. et al. Frequency-dependent local interactions and low-energy effective models from electronic structure calculations. Phys. Rev. B 70, 195104 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195104 ↗
58. Aryasetiawan, F., Karlsson, K., Jepsen, O. & Schönberger, U. Calculations of Hubbard U from first-principles. Phys. Rev. B 74, 125106 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.74.125106 ↗
59. Jiang, H. et al. FHI-gap: a GW code based on the all-electron augmented plane wave method. Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 348–366 (2012).10.1016/j.cpc.2012.09.018 ↗
60. Eschrig, H. & Koepernik, K. Tight-binding models for the iron-based superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 80, 104503 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.80.104503 ↗
61. Koepernik, K. & Eschrig, H. Full-potential nonorthogonal local–orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1743–1757 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1743 ↗
62. Neese, F. The ORCA program system. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2, 73–78 (2012).10.1002/wcms.81 ↗
63. Neese, F. Efficient and accurate approximations to the molecular spin–orbit coupling operator and their use in molecular g-tensor calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 034107 (2005).10.1063/1.1829047 ↗