journal article·2019-08-19Open access

Direct observation of a uniaxial stress-driven Lifshitz transition in Sr2RuO4

Veronika Sunko, Edgar Abarca Morales, Igor Marković, Mark E. Barber, Dijana Milosavljević, Federico Mazzola, Dmitry A. Sokolov, Naoki Kikugawa, Cephise Cacho, Pavel Dudin, Helge Rosner, Clifford W. Hicks, Philip D. C. King, Andrew P. Mackenzie

npj Quantum Materials· Volume 4· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Pressure represents a clean tuning parameter for traversing the complex phase diagrams of interacting electron systems, and as such has proved of key importance in the study of quantum materials. Application of controlled uniaxial pressure has recently been shown to more than double the transition temperature of the unconventional superconductor Sr2RuO4, leading to a pronounced peak in Tc versus strain whose origin is still under active debate. Here we develop a simple and compact method to passively apply large uniaxial pressures in restricted sample environments, and utilise this to study the evolution of the electronic structure of Sr2RuO4 using angle-resolved photoemission. We directly visualise how uniaxial stress drives a Lifshitz transition of the γ-band Fermi surface, pointing to the key role of strain-tuning its associated van Hove singularity to the Fermi level in mediating the peak in Tc. Our measurements provide stringent constraints for theoretical models of the strain-tuned electronic structure evolution of Sr2RuO4. More generally, our experimental approach opens the door to future studies of strain-tuned phase transitions not only using photoemission but also other experimental techniques where large pressure cells or piezoelectric-based devices may be difficult to implement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Condensed Matter Physics · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Maeno, Y. et al. Superconductivity in a layered perovskite without copper. Nature 372, 532–534 (1994).10.1038/372532a0 ↗
2. Mackenzie, A. P. & Maeno, Y. The superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 and the physics of spin-triplet pairing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 657–712 (2003).10.1103/RevModPhys.75.657 ↗
3. Kallin, C. Chiral p-wave order in Sr2RuO4. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 42501 (2012).10.1088/0034-4885/75/4/042501 ↗
4. Maeno, Y., Kittaka, S., Nomura, T., Yonezawa, S. & Ishida, K. Evaluation of Spin-triplet Superconductivity in Sr2RuO4. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 11009 (2012).10.1143/JPSJ.81.011009 ↗
5. Liu, Y. & Mao, Z.-Q. Unconventional superconductivity in Sr2RuO4. Phys. C Supercond. Appl. 514, 339–353 (2015).10.1016/j.physc.2015.02.039 ↗
6. Mackenzie, A. P., Scaffidi, T., Hicks, C. W. & Maeno, Y. Even odder after twenty-three years: the superconducting order parameter puzzle of Sr2RuO4. Npj Quantum. Mater. 2, 40 (2017).10.1038/s41535-017-0045-4 ↗
7. Mackenzie, A. P. et al. Quantum oscillations in the layered perovskite superconductor Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3786–3789 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3786 ↗
8. Bergemann, C., Mackenzie, A. P., Julian, S. R., Forsythe, D. & Ohmichi, E. Quasi-two-dimensional Fermi liquid properties of the unconventional superconductor Sr2RuO4. Adv. Phys. 52, 639–725 (2003).10.1080/00018730310001621737 ↗
9. Damascelli, A. et al. Fermi surface, surface states, and surface reconstruction in Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5194–5197 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5194 ↗
10. Veenstra, C. N. et al. Spin-orbital entanglement and the breakdown of singlets and triplets in Sr2RuO4 revealed by spin- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 127002 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.127002 ↗
11. Tamai, A. et al. High-resolution photoemission on Sr2RuO4 reveals correlation-enhanced effective spin–orbit coupling and dominantly local self-energies. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021048 (2019).
12. Nomura, T. & Yamada, K. Roles of electron correlations in the spin-triplet superconductivity of Sr2RuO4. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 1993–2004 (2002).10.1143/JPSJ.71.1993 ↗
13. Raghu, S., Kapitulnik, A. & Kivelson, S. A. Hidden quasi-one-dimensional superconductivity in Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 136401 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136401 ↗
14. Scaffidi, T., Romers, J. C. & Simon, S. H. Pairing symmetry and dominant band in Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 89, 220510 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.220510 ↗
15. Mravlje, J. et al. Coherence-incoherence crossover and the mass-renormalization puzzles in Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 096401 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.096401 ↗
16. Zingl, M., Mravlje, J., Aichhorn, M., Parcollet, O. & Georges, A. Sign changes of the Hall coefficient in Sr2RuO4 reveal coherent-to-incoherent and elastic-to-inelastic crossovers. ArXiv Prepr. https://arxiv.org/abs/190205503 (2019).10.1038/s41535-019-0175-y ↗
17. Pustogow, A. et al. Pronounced drop of 17O NMR Knight shift in superconducting state of Sr2RuO4. ArXiv Prepr. https://arxiv.org/abs/190400047 (2019).
18. Deguchi, K., Mao, Z. Q. & Maeno, Y. Determination of the superconducting gap structure in all bands of the spin-triplet superconductor Sr2RuO4. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 73, 1313–1321 (2004).10.1143/JPSJ.73.1313 ↗
19. Firmo, I. A. et al. Evidence from tunneling spectroscopy for a quasi-one-dimensional origin of superconductivity in Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 88, 134521 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.88.134521 ↗
20. Kittaka, S. et al. Searching for gap zeros in Sr2RuO4 via field-angle-dependent specific-heat measurement. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 87, 93703 (2018).10.7566/JPSJ.87.093703 ↗
21. Hicks, C. W. et al. Strong Increase of T c of Sr2RuO4 under both tensile and compressive strain. Science 344, 283–285 (2014).10.1126/science.1248292 ↗
22. Hicks, C. W., Barber, M. E., Edkins, S. D., Brodsky, D. O. & Mackenzie, A. P. Piezoelectric-based apparatus for strain tuning. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 65003 (2014).10.1063/1.4881611 ↗
23. Steppke, A. et al. Strong peak in T c of Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial pressure. Science 355, eaaf9398 (2017).10.1126/science.aaf9398 ↗
24. Barber, M. E., Gibbs, A. S., Maeno, Y., Mackenzie, A. P. & Hicks, C. W. Resistivity in the vicinity of a van hove singularity: Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.076602 ↗
25. Mackenzie, A. P. et al. Extremely strong dependence of superconductivity on disorder in Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 161–164 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.161 ↗
26. Shen, K. M. et al. Evolution of the fermi surface and quasiparticle renormalization through a van hove singularity in Sr2-yLayRuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 187001 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.187001 ↗
27. Burganov, B. et al. Strain control of fermiology and many-body interactions in two-dimensional ruthenates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 197003 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.197003 ↗
28. Taniguchi, H., Nishimura, K., Goh, S. K., Yonezawa, S. & Maeno, Y. Higher-T c superconducting phase in Sr2RuO4 induced by in-plane uniaxial pressure. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 84, 14707 (2015).10.7566/JPSJ.84.014707 ↗
29. Maeno, Y. et al. Enhancement of superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 to 3 K by embedded metallic microdomains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3765–3768 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3765 ↗
30. Lifshitz, I. Anomalies of electron characteristics of a metal in the high pressure region. Sov. Phys. Jetp-Ussr 11, 1130–1135 (1960).
31. Luo, Y. et al. Normal state 17O NMR studies of Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial stress. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021044 (2019).
32. Georges, A., de’ Medici, L. & Mravlje, J. Strong correlations from Hund’s coupling. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 137–178 (2013).10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125045 ↗
33. Liu, Y.-C., Zhang, F.-C., Rice, T. M. & Wang, Q.-H. Theory of the evolution of superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 under anisotropic strain. Npj Quantum Mater. 2, (2017).10.1038/s41535-017-0014-y ↗
34. Flötotto, D. et al. In situ strain tuning of the dirac surface states in Bi2Se3 films. Nano Lett. 18, 5628–5632 (2018).10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02105 ↗
35. Yi, M. et al. Symmetry-breaking orbital anisotropy observed for detwinned BaFe1-xCoxAs2 above the spin density wave transition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6878–6883 (2011).10.1073/pnas.1015572108 ↗
36. Kim, Y. et al. Electronic structure of detwinned BaFe2As2 from photoemission and first principles. Phys. Rev. B 83, 64509 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.83.064509 ↗
37. Watson, M. D., Haghighirad, A. A., Rhodes, L. C., Hoesch, M. & Kim, T. K. Electronic anisotropies revealed by detwinned angle-resolved photo-emission spectroscopy measurements of FeSe. New J. Phys. 19, 103021 (2017).10.1088/1367-2630/aa8a04 ↗
38. Pfau, H. et al. Detailed band structure of twinned and detwinned BaFe2As2 studied with angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 99, 35118 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.99.035118 ↗
39. Riccò, S. et al. In situ strain tuning of the metal-insulator-transition of Ca2RuO4 in angle-resolved photoemission experiments. Nat. Commun. 9, 4535 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-06945-0 ↗
40. Barber, M. E., Steppke, A., Mackenzie, A. P. & Hicks, C. W. Piezoelectric-based uniaxial pressure cell with integrated force and displacement sensors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90, 23904 (2019).10.1063/1.5075485 ↗
41. He, M. et al. Dichotomy between in-plane magnetic susceptibility and resistivity anisotropies in extremely strained BaFe2As2. Nat. Commun. 8, 504 (2017).10.1038/s41467-017-00712-3 ↗
42. Hsu, Y.-T. et al. Manipulating superconductivity in ruthenates through Fermi surface engineering. Phys. Rev. B 94, 45118 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.045118 ↗
43. Acharya, S. et al. Evening out the spin and charge parity to increase T c in unconventional superconductors. ArXiv Prepr. https://arxiv.org/abs/181105143 (2018).
44. Ghamari, S., Lee, S.-S. & Kallin, C. Renormalization group analysis of a neck-narrowing Lifshitz transition in the presence of weak short-range interactions in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. B 92, 85112 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.085112 ↗
45. Efremov, D. V. et al. Multicritical Fermi surface topological transitions. ArXiv Prepr. https://arxiv.org/abs/181013392 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.207202 ↗
46. Berg, E., Hartnoll, S. A. & Mousatov, C. H. Theory of strange metals from hot fermions. ArXiv Prepr. https://arxiv.org/abs/181012945 (2018).
47. Isobe, H. & Fu, L. Supermetal. ArXiv Prepr. https://arxiv.org/abs/190505188v1 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033206 ↗
48. Paglione, J. et al. Elastic tensor of Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 65, 220506 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevB.65.220506 ↗
49. Chu, J.-H., Kuo, H.-H., Analytis, J. G. & Fisher, I. R. Divergent nematic susceptibility in an iron arsenide superconductor. Science 337, 710–712 (2012).10.1126/science.1221713 ↗
50. Bobowski, J. S. et al. Improved single-crystal growth of Sr2RuO4. Condens. Matter 4, 6 (2019).10.3390/condmat4010006 ↗
51. Hoesch, M. et al. A facility for the analysis of the electronic structures of solids and their surfaces by synchrotron radiation photoelectron spectroscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 13106 (2017).10.1063/1.4973562 ↗
52. Koepernik, K. & Eschrig, H. Full-potential nonorthogonal local-orbital minimum-basis band-structure scheme. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1743–1757 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1743 ↗
53. Opahle, I., Koepernik, K. & Eschrig, H. Full-potential band-structure calculation of iron pyrite. Phys. Rev. B 60, 14035–14041 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.60.14035 ↗
54. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
55. Eschrig, H., Richter, M. & Opahle, I. Relativistic solid state calculations. in Relativistic Electronic Structure Theory, (Part II, Applications), (ed. Schwerdtfeger, P.), Vol. 13, 721 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2014).
56. Chmaissem, O., Jorgensen, J. D., Shaked, H., Ikeda, S. & Maeno, Y. Thermal expansion and compressibility of Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 57, 5067–5070 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.57.5067 ↗