journal article·2025-02-14Open access

Fragmented superconductivity in the Hubbard model as solitons in Ginzburg–Landau theory

Niccolò Baldelli, Hannes Karlsson, Benedikt Kloss, Matthew Fishman, Alexander Wietek

npj Quantum Materials· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

The phenomena of superconductivity and charge density waves are observed in close vicinity in many strongly correlated materials. Increasing evidence from experiments and numerical simulations suggests both phenomena can also occur in an intertwined manner, where the superconducting order parameter is coupled to the electronic density. Employing density matrix renormalization group simulations, we investigate the nature of such an intertwined state of matter stabilized in the phase diagram of the elementary $$t-{t}^{{\prime} }-U$$ Hubbard model in the strong coupling regime. Remarkably, the condensate of Cooper pairs is shown to be fragmented in the presence of a charge density wave where more than one pairing wave function is macroscopically occupied. Moreover, we provide conclusive evidence that the macroscopic wave functions of the superconducting fragments are well-described by soliton solutions of a Ginzburg-Landau equation in a periodic potential constituted by the charge density wave. In the presence of an orbital magnetic field, the order parameters are gauge invariant, and superconducting vortices are pinned between the stripes. This intertwined Ginzburg-Landau theory is proposed as an effective low-energy description of the stripe fragmented superconductor.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Organic and Molecular Conductors Research · Quantum and electron transport phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. Fradkin, E., Kivelson, S. A. & Tranquada, J. M. Colloquium: theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 457–482 (2015).10.1103/RevModPhys.87.457 ↗
2. Fernandes, R. M., Orth, P. P. & Schmalian, J. Intertwined vestigial order in quantum materials: nematicity and beyond. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 133–154 (2019).10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013200 ↗
3. Vojta, M. Lattice symmetry breaking in cuprate superconductors: stripes, nematics, and superconductivity. Adv. Phys. 58, 699–820 (2009).10.1080/00018730903122242 ↗
4. Zaanen, J. & Gunnarsson, O. Charged magnetic domain lines and the magnetism of high-Tc oxides. Phys. Rev. B 40, 7391–7394 (1989).10.1103/PhysRevB.40.7391 ↗
5. Poilblanc, D. & Rice, T. M. Charged solitons in the hartree-fock approximation to the large-u hubbard model. Phys. Rev. B 39, 9749–9752 (1989).10.1103/PhysRevB.39.9749 ↗
6. Machida, K. Magnetism in La2CuO4 based compounds. Phys. C: Supercond. Appl 158, 192 – 196 (1989).10.1016/0921-4534(89)90316-X ↗
7. Kato, M., Machida, K., Nakanishi, H. & Fujita, M. Soliton lattice modulation of incommensurate spin density wave in two dimensional hubbard model –a mean field study. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 59, 1047–1058 (1990).10.1143/JPSJ.59.1047 ↗
8. LeBlanc, J. P. F. et al. Solutions of the two-dimensional hubbard model: Benchmarks and results from a wide range of numerical algorithms. Phys. Rev. X 5, 041041 (2015).
9. Zheng, B.-X. et al. Stripe order in the underdoped region of the two-dimensional Hubbard model. Science 358, 1155–1160 (2017).10.1126/science.aam7127 ↗
10. Huang, E. W. et al. Numerical evidence of fluctuating stripes in the normal state of high-Tc cuprate superconductors. Science 358, 1161–1164 (2017).10.1126/science.aak9546 ↗
11. Huang, E. W., Mendl, C. B., Jiang, H.-C., Moritz, B. & Devereaux, T. P. Stripe order from the perspective of the Hubbard model. npj Quantum Mater. 3, 22 (2018).10.1038/s41535-018-0097-0 ↗
12. Qin, M. et al. Absence of superconductivity in the pure two-dimensional hubbard model. Phys. Rev. X 10, 031016 (2020).
13. Anderson, P. W. The Resonating Valence Bond State in La2CuO4 and Superconductivity. Science 235, 1196–1198 (1987).10.1126/science.235.4793.1196 ↗
14. Zhang, F. C. & Rice, T. M. Effective Hamiltonian for the superconducting Cu oxides. Phys. Rev. B 37, 3759–3761 (1988).10.1103/PhysRevB.37.3759 ↗
15. Emery, V. J. & Reiter, G. Mechanism for high-temperature superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 38, 4547–4556 (1988).10.1103/PhysRevB.38.4547 ↗
16. Kivelson, S. A. et al. How to detect fluctuating stripes in the high-temperature superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1201–1241 (2003).10.1103/RevModPhys.75.1201 ↗
17. Wen, J.-J. et al. Observation of two types of charge-density-wave orders in superconducting La2−xSrxCuO4. Nat. Commun. 10, 3269 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-11167-z ↗
18. Mai, P., Karakuzu, S., Balduzzi, G., Johnston, S. & Maier, T. A. Intertwined spin, charge, and pair correlations in the two-dimensional hubbard model in the thermodynamic limit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2112806119 (2022).10.1073/pnas.2112806119 ↗
19. Mai, P. et al. Robust charge-density-wave correlations in the electron-doped single-band Hubbard model. Nat. Commun. 14, 2889 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-38566-7 ↗
20. Huang, E. W. et al. Fluctuating intertwined stripes in the strange metal regime of the hubbard model. Phys. Rev. B 107, 085126 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevB.107.085126 ↗
21. Xu, H., Shi, H., Vitali, E., Qin, M. & Zhang, S. Stripes and spin-density waves in the doped two-dimensional hubbard model: ground state phase diagram. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013239 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013239 ↗
22. Xiao, B., He, Y.-Y., Georges, A. & Zhang, S. Temperature dependence of spin and charge orders in the doped two-dimensional hubbard model. Phys. Rev. X 13, 011007 (2023).
23. Šimkovic, F., Rossi, R. & Ferrero, M. Two-dimensional hubbard model at finite temperature: weak, strong, and long correlation regimes. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043201 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043201 ↗
24. Wietek, A. et al. Tunable stripe order and weak superconductivity in the moiré hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043048 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043048 ↗
25. Wietek, A., He, Y.-Y., White, S. R., Georges, A. & Stoudenmire, E. M. Stripes, antiferromagnetism, and the pseudogap in the doped hubbard model at finite temperature. Phys. Rev. X 11, 031007 (2021).
26. Gong, S., Zhu, W. & Sheng, D. N. Robust d-wave superconductivity in the square-lattice t–j model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 097003 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.097003 ↗
27. Jiang, S., Scalapino, D. J. & White, S. R. Ground-state phase diagram of the t– $${t}^{{\prime}}$$ –j model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2109978118 (2021).10.1073/pnas.2109978118 ↗
28. Jiang, H.-C. & Kivelson, S. A. High temperature superconductivity in a lightly doped quantum spin liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 097002 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.097002 ↗
29. Jiang, Y.-F., Devereaux, T. P. & Jiang, H.-C. Ground state phase diagram and superconductivity of the doped hubbard model on six-leg square cylinders arXiv:2303.15541. (2023).10.1103/PhysRevB.109.085121 ↗
30. Jiang, H.-C. Pair density wave in the doped three-band hubbard model on two-leg square cylinders. Phys. Rev. B 107, 214504 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevB.107.214504 ↗
31. Xu, H. et al. Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the hubbard model. Science 384, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh7691 (2024).10.1126/science.adh7691 ↗
32. Lu, X., Chen, F., Zhu, W., Sheng, D. N. & Gong, S.-S. Emergent superconductivity and competing charge orders in hole-doped square-lattice t–J model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 066002, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.066002 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.066002 ↗
33. Wang, H.-X., Jiang, Y.-F. & Yao, H. Robust d-wave superconductivity from the su-schrieffer-heeger-hubbard model: possible route to high-temperature superconductivity. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.09143 (2022).10.48550/arXiv.2211.09143 ↗
34. Ponsioen, B., Chung, S. S. & Corboz, P. Superconducting stripes in the hole-doped three-band hubbard model. arXiv:2306.12910. (2023).10.1103/PhysRevB.108.205154 ↗
35. Agterberg, D. F. & Tsunetsugu, H. Dislocations and vortices in pair-density-wave superconductors. Nat. Phys. 4, 639–642 (2008).10.1038/nphys999 ↗
36. Dai, Z., Zhang, Y.-H., Senthil, T. & Lee, P. A. Pair-density waves, charge-density waves, and vortices in high-Tc cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 97, 174511 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.97.174511 ↗
37. Agterberg, D. F. et al. The physics of pair-density waves: cuprate superconductors and beyond. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 11, 231–270 (2020).10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050711 ↗
38. Huang, K. S., Han, Z., Kivelson, S. A. & Yao, H. Pair-density-wave in the strong coupling limit of the Holstein-Hubbard model. npj Quantum Mater. 7, 17 (2022).10.1038/s41535-022-00426-w ↗
39. Setty, C., Fanfarillo, L. & Hirschfeld, P. J. Mechanism for fluctuating pair density wave. Nat. Commun. 14, 3181 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-38956-x ↗
40. Wang, Y. et al. Pair density waves in superconducting vortex halos. Phys. Rev. B 97, 174510 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.97.174510 ↗
41. Hamidian, M. H. et al. Detection of a Cooper-pair density wave in Bi2 Sr2 CaCu2 O8+x. Nature 532, 343–347 (2016).10.1038/nature17411 ↗
42. Gu, Q. et al. Detection of a pair density wave state in UTe2. Nature 618, 921–927 (2023).10.1038/s41586-023-05919-7 ↗
43. Wietek, A. Fragmented cooper pair condensation in striped superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 177001 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.177001 ↗
44. White, S. R. Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863–2866 (1992).10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2863 ↗
45. White, S. R. Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups. Phys. Rev. B 48, 10345–10356 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.48.10345 ↗
46. Schollwöck, U. The density-matrix renormalization group. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 259–315 (2005).10.1103/RevModPhys.77.259 ↗
47. Schollwöck, U. The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states. Annu. Phys. 326, 96 – 192 (2011).
48. Ginzburg, V. L. & Landau, L. D. On the theory of superconductivity. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 20, 1064–1082 (1950).
49. Hatsugai, Y. & Kohmoto, M. Energy spectrum and the quantum hall effect on the square lattice with next-nearest-neighbor hopping. Phys. Rev. B 42, 8282–8294 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevB.42.8282 ↗
50. Cocks, D. et al. Time-reversal-invariant hofstadter-hubbard model with ultracold fermions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 205303 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.205303 ↗
51. Stenzel, L., Hayward, A. L. C., Schollwöck, U. & Heidrich-Meisner, F. Topological phases in the fermi-hofstadter-hubbard model on hybrid-space ladders. Phys. Rev. A 102, 023315 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevA.102.023315 ↗
52. Palm, F. A., Kurttutan, M., Bohrdt, A., Schollwöck, U. & Grusdt, F. Ferromagnetism and skyrmions in the hofstadter–fermi–hubbard model. New J. Physi. 25, 023021 (2023).10.1088/1367-2630/acb963 ↗
53. Jiang, Y.-F., Zaanen, J., Devereaux, T. P. & Jiang, H.-C. Ground state phase diagram of the doped hubbard model on the four-leg cylinder. Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033073 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033073 ↗
54. Leggett, A. J.Quantum Liquids (Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street Oxford, 2006).
55. Penrose, O. & Onsager, L. Bose-einstein condensation and liquid helium. Phys. Rev. 104, 576–584 (1956).10.1103/PhysRev.104.576 ↗
56. Bloch, F. über die Quantenmechanik der Elektronen in Kristallgittern. Z. Phys. 52, 555–600 (1929).10.1007/BF01339455 ↗
57. Serkin, V., Matsumoto, M. & Belyaeva, T. Bright and dark solitary nonlinear bloch waves in dispersion managed fiber systems and soliton lasers. Opt. Commun. 196, 159–171 (2001).10.1016/S0030-4018(01)01365-7 ↗
58. Haus, H. A. & Chen, Y. Dispersion-managed solitons as nonlinear bloch waves. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 16, 889–894 (1999).10.1364/JOSAB.16.000889 ↗
59. Louis, P. J. Y., Ostrovskaya, E. A., Savage, C. M. & Kivshar, Y. S. Bose-einstein condensates in optical lattices: Band-gap structure and solitons. Phys. Rev. A 67, 013602 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevA.67.013602 ↗
60. Choi, D.-I. & Niu, Q. Bose-einstein condensates in an optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2022–2025 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2022 ↗
61. Denschlag, J. H. et al. A bose-einstein condensate in an optical lattice. J. Phys. B 35, 3095–3110 (2002).10.1088/0953-4075/35/14/307 ↗
62. Bloch, I. Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices. Nat. Phys. 1, 23–30 (2005).10.1038/nphys138 ↗
63. Broyden, C. G. The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms 1. general considerations. IMA J. Appl. Math. 6, 76–90 (1970).10.1093/imamat/6.1.76 ↗
64. Fletcher, R. A new approach to variable metric algorithms. Comput. J. 13, 317–322 (1970).10.1093/comjnl/13.3.317 ↗
65. Goldfarb, D. A family of variable-metric methods derived by variational means. Math. Comput. 24, 23–26 (1970).10.1090/S0025-5718-1970-0258249-6 ↗
66. Shanno, D. F. Conditioning of quasi-newton methods for function minimization. Math. Comput. 24, 647–656 (1970).10.1090/S0025-5718-1970-0274029-X ↗
67. Cai, R.-G., Li, L., Wang, Y.-Q. & Zaanen, J. Intertwined order and holography: The case of parity breaking pair density waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 181601 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.181601 ↗
68. Gabovich, A. M. & Voitenko, A. I. Model for the coexistence of d-wave superconducting and charge-density-wave order parameters in high-temperature cuprate superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 80, 224501 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.80.224501 ↗
69. Balseiro, C. A. & Falicov, L. M. Superconductivity and charge-density waves. Phys. Rev. B 20, 4457–4464 (1979).10.1103/PhysRevB.20.4457 ↗
70. Lian, C.-S., Si, C. & Duan, W. Unveiling charge-density wave, superconductivity, and their competitive nature in two-dimensional NbSe2. Nano Lett. 18, 2924–2929 (2018).10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00237 ↗
71. Chang, J. et al. Direct observation of competition between superconductivity and charge density wave order in YBa2Cu3O6.67. Nat. Phys. 8, 871–876 (2012).10.1038/nphys2456 ↗
72. Castellani, C., Castro, C. D. & Grilli, M. Non-fermi-liquid behavior and d-wave superconductivity near the charge-density-wave quantum critical point. Z. Phys. B 103, 137–144 (1996).10.1007/s002570050347 ↗
73. Chu, H. et al. Phase-resolved Higgs response in superconducting cuprates. Nat. Commun. 11, 1793 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-15613-1 ↗
74. Chu, H. et al. Fano interference between collective modes in cuprate high-Tc superconductors. Nat. Commun. 14, 1343 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-36787-4 ↗
75. Feng, L. et al. Dynamical interplay between superconductivity and charge-density-wave: a nonlinear terahertz study of coherently-driven 2H-NbSe2 and La2−xSrxCuO4 arXiv:2211.10947. (2022).
76. Edkins, S. D. et al. Magnetic field–induced pair density wave state in the cuprate vortex halo. Science 364, 976–980 (2019).10.1126/science.aat1773 ↗
77. Liu, X., Chong, Y. X., Sharma, R. & Davis, J. C. S. Discovery of a cooper-pair density wave state in a transition-metal dichalcogenide. Science 372, 1447–1452 (2021).10.1126/science.abd4607 ↗
78. Hubig, C., Haegeman, J. & Schollwöck, U. Error estimates for extrapolations with matrix-product states. Phys. Rev. B 97, 045125 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.97.045125 ↗
79. Baldelli, N., Karlsson, H. & Fishman, M. ITensorCorrelators.jl. https://github.com/ITensor/ITensorCorrelators.jl.git (2023).
80. Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
81. Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S. & Shah, V. B. Julia: A fresh approach to numerical computing. SIAM review 59, 65–98 (2017).10.1137/141000671 ↗
82. Fishman, M., White, S. R. & Stoudenmire, E. M. The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calculations. SciPost Phys. Codebases 4, https://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.4. (2022).10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.4 ↗
83. Fishman, M., White, S. R. & Stoudenmire, E. M. Codebase release 0.3 for ITensor. SciPost Phys. Codebases 4–r0.3 https://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.4-r0.3 (2022).10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.4-r0.3 ↗
84. Wietek, A. GLPack. https://github.com/awietek/glpack (2023).