A review of displacement cascade simulations using molecular dynamics emphasizing interatomic potentials for TPBAR components
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This review explores molecular dynamics simulations for studying radiation damage in Tritium Producing Burnable Absorber Rod (TPBAR) materials, emphasizing the role of interatomic potentials in displacement cascades. Recent machine learning potentials (MLPs), trained on quantum data, enhance prediction accuracy over traditional models like EAM. We highlight temperature, PKA energy, and composition effects on damage evolution in TPBAR components, recommending suitable potentials and discussing advancements for materials in extreme radiation environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Nordlund, K. Historical review of computer simulation of radiation effects in materials. J. Nucl. Mater. 520, 273–295 (2019).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.04.028 ↗
2. Stoller, R. E. Primary radiation damage formation. Compr. Nucl. Mater. 1, 293–332 (2012).10.1016/B978-0-08-056033-5.00027-6 ↗
3. Wang, L. et al. Irradiation-induced nanostructures. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 286, 72–80 (2000).10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00677-8 ↗
4. Eyre, B. Transmission electron microscope studies of point defect clusters in fcc and bcc metals. J. Phys. F. Met. Phys. 3, 422 (1973).10.1088/0305-4608/3/2/009 ↗
5. Roy, A., Senor, D. J., Edwards, D. J., Casella, A. M., Devanathan, R. Insights into radiation resistance of titanium alloys from displacement cascade simulations. J. Nuclear Mater. 586, 154695 (2023).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154695 ↗
6. Hashimoto, A., Suenaga, K., Gloter, A., Urita, K. & Iijima, S. Direct evidence for atomic defects in graphene layers. Nature 430, 870–873 (2004).10.1038/nature02817 ↗
7. Birtcher, R. & Donnelly, S. Plastic flow produced by single ion impacts on metals. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. 148, 194–199 (1999).10.1016/S0168-583X(98)00822-2 ↗
8. Erlebacher, J., Aziz, M. J., Chason, E., Sinclair, M. B. & Floro, J. A. Spontaneous pattern formation on ion bombarded Si (001). Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2330 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2330 ↗
9. Roorda, S., Hakvoort, R., Van Veen, A., Stolk, P. & Saris, F. Structural and electrical defects in amorphous silicon probed by positrons and electrons. J. Appl. Phys. 72, 5145–5152 (1992).10.1063/1.351993 ↗
10. Laaziri, K. et al. High-energy x-ray diffraction study of pure amorphous silicon. Phys. Rev. B 60, 13520 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.60.13520 ↗
11. Goel, S. et al. Horizons of modern molecular dynamics simulation in digitalized solid freeform fabrication with advanced materials. Mater. Today Chem. 18, 100356 (2020).10.1016/j.mtchem.2020.100356 ↗
12. Boev, A. O., Zolnikov, K. P., Nelasov, I. V., Lipnitskii, A. G. Effect of titanium on the primary radiation damage and swelling of vanadium-titanium alloys. Lett. Mater. 8, 263–267 (2018).10.22226/2410-3535-2018-3-263-267 ↗
13. Roy, A., Casella, A. M., Senor, D. J., Jiang, W. & Devanathan, R. Molecular dynamics simulations of displacement cascades in LiAlO2 and LiAl5O8 ceramics. Sci. Rep. 14, 1897 (2024).10.1038/s41598-024-51222-4 ↗
14. Nordlund, K. et al. Primary radiation damage: a review of current understanding and models. J. Nucl. Mater. 512, 450–479 (2018).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.10.027 ↗
15. Senor, D. J. Recommendations for Tritium Science and Technology Research and Development in Support of the Tritium Readiness Campaign, TTP-7-084. https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-22873.pdf (2013).10.2172/1113608 ↗
16. Burns, K. A., Love, E. F. Thornhill, Description of the Tritium-Producing Burnable Absorber Rod for the Commercial Light Water Reactor TTQP-1-015 Rev 19. https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-22086.pdf (2012).10.2172/1089103 ↗
17. Devaraj, A., Matthews, B., Arey, B., Kautz, E., Sevigny, G. & Senor, D. Comprehensive analysis of hydrogen, deuterium, tritium and isotopic ratios of other light elements in neutron irradiated TPBAR components. Microsc. Microanal. 25, 280–281 (2019).10.1017/S1431927619002137 ↗
18. Roy, A. et al. Cluster dynamics simulations of tritium and helium diffusion in lithium ceramics. J. Nucl. Mater. 592, 154970 (2024).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.154970 ↗
19. Béland, L. K. et al. Features of primary damage by high energy displacement cascades in concentrated Ni-based alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 119, 085901 (2016).10.1063/1.4942533 ↗
20. Deluigi, O. R., Pasianot, R. C., Valencia, F., Caro, A., Farkas, D. & Bringa, E. M. Simulations of primary damage in a high entropy alloy: probing enhanced radiation resistance. Acta Mater. 213, 116951 (2021).10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116951 ↗
21. Zhou, W. et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of high-energy displacement cascades in hcp-Zr. J. Nucl. Mater. 508, 540–545 (2018).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.06.002 ↗
22. Do, H.-S. & Lee, B.-J. Origin of radiation resistance in multi-principal element alloys. Sci. Rep. 8, 16015 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-34486-5 ↗
23. Voskoboinikov, R. Simulation of primary radiation damage in nickel. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 121, 14–20 (2020).10.1134/S0031918X20010196 ↗
24. Gao, F. & Bacon, D. Temperature effects on defect production and disordering by displacement cascades in Ni3Al. Philos. Mag. A 80, 1453–1468 (2000).10.1080/01418610008212130 ↗
25. Bacon, D. J. & De La Rubia, T. D. Molecular dynamics computer simulations of displacement cascades in metals. J. Nucl. Mater. 216, 275–290 (1994).10.1016/0022-3115(94)90016-7 ↗
26. Lin, Y. et al. Enhanced radiation tolerance of the Ni-Co-Cr-Fe high-entropy alloy as revealed from primary damage. Acta Mater.196, 133–143 (2020).10.1016/j.actamat.2020.06.027 ↗
27. Zarkadoula, E., Samolyuk, G. & Weber, W. J. Two-temperature model in molecular dynamics simulations of cascades in Ni-based alloys. J. Alloy. Compd. 700, 106–112 (2017).10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.441 ↗
28. Was, G. S. The Damage Cascade, Fundamentals of Radiation Materials Science: Metals and Alloys 1st edn, Vol. 827 (2017).
29. Zarkadoula, E., Samolyuk, G., Zhang, Y. & Weber, W. J. Electronic stopping in molecular dynamics simulations of cascades in 3C–SiC. J. Nucl. Mater. 540, 152371 (2020).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152371 ↗
30. Borodin, V. Molecular dynamics simulation of annealing of post-ballistic cascade remnants in silicon. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. 282, 33–37 (2012).10.1016/j.nimb.2011.08.047 ↗
31. Jay, A. et al. Simulation of single particle displacement damage in silicon–part II: generation and long-time relaxation of damage structure. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 64, 141–148 (2016).10.1109/TNS.2016.2628089 ↗
32. Samolyuk, G. D., Osetsky, Y. & Stoller, R. E. Molecular dynamics modeling of atomic displacement cascades in 3C–SiC: comparison of interatomic potentials. J. Nucl. Mater. 465, 83–88 (2015).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.05.036 ↗
33. Paudel, H. P., Lee,Y.-L., Holber, J., Sorescu, D. C., Duan, Y. Fundamental Studies of Tritium Solubility and Diffusivity in LiAlO2 and Lithium Zirconates Pellets Used in TPBAR. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1463897 (2017).10.2172/1463897 ↗
34. Sahoo, D. R., Chaudhuri, P. & Swaminathan, N. A molecular dynamics study of displacement cascades and radiation induced amorphization in Li2TiO3. Comput. Mater. Sci. 200, 110783 (2021).10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110783 ↗
35. Franklin, M. et al. Development of diamond radiation detectors for SSC and LHC. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accelerators Spectrometers, Detect. Associated Equip. 315, 39–42 (1992).10.1016/0168-9002(92)90677-V ↗
36. Tapper, R. Diamond detectors in particle physics. Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 1273 (2000).10.1088/0034-4885/63/8/203 ↗
37. Buchan, J., Robinson, M., Christie, H., Roach, D., Ross, D., Marks, N. A. Molecular dynamics simulation of radiation damage cascades in diamond. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 245901 (2015).10.1063/1.4922457 ↗
38. Christie, H., Robinson, M., Roach, D., Ross, D., Suarez-Martinez, I. & Marks, N. A. Simulating radiation damage cascades in graphite. Carbon 81, 105–114 (2015).10.1016/j.carbon.2014.09.031 ↗
39. Terentyev, D. et al. Effect of the interatomic potential on the features of displacement cascades in α-Fe: a molecular dynamics study. J. Nucl. Mater. 351, 65–77 (2006).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.020 ↗
40. Ackland, G., Mendelev, M., Srolovitz, D., Han, S. & Barashev, A. Development of an interatomic potential for phosphorus impurities in α-iron. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 16, S2629 (2004).10.1088/0953-8984/16/27/003 ↗
41. Wallenius, J., Olsson, P. & Lagerstedt, C. Relation between thermal expansion and interstitial formation energy in pure Fe and Cr. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. 228, 122–125 (2005).10.1016/j.nimb.2004.10.032 ↗
42. Chakarova, R., Pontikis, V., Wallenius, J. Development of FeCr Many-Body Potential and Cohesion Model, Delivery Report WP6, SPIRE Project, EC Contract (F1KW-CT) 2000-00058. https://www.researchgate.net/(2006).
43. Ackland, G., Bacon, D., Calder, A. & Harry, T. Computer simulation of point defect properties in dilute Fe—Cu alloy using a many-body interatomic potential. Philos. Mag. A 75, 713–732 (1997).10.1080/01418619708207198 ↗
44. Stoller, R. E. The role of cascade energy and temperature in primary defect formation in iron. J. Nucl. Mater. 276, 22–32 (2000).10.1016/S0022-3115(99)00204-4 ↗
45. Gao, C., Tian, D., Li, M. & Qian, D. Comparative study of displacement cascades simulated with ‘magnetic’potentials and Mendelev-type potential in α-Fe. J. Nucl. Mater. 487, 167–173 (2017).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.01.039 ↗
46. Chiesa, S., Derlet, P. & Dudarev, S. Free energy of a〈 110〉 dumbbell interstitial defect in bcc Fe: Harmonic and anharmonic contributions. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 79, 214109 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.79.214109 ↗
47. Chiesa, S., Derlet, P., Dudarev, S. & Swygenhoven, H. Van Optimization of the magnetic potential for α-Fe. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 206001 (2011).10.1088/0953-8984/23/20/206001 ↗
48. Sand, A. E., Dequeker, J., Becquart, C., Domain, C. & Nordlund, K. Non-equilibrium properties of interatomic potentials in cascade simulations in tungsten. J. Nucl. Mater. 470, 119–127 (2016).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.12.012 ↗
49. Finnis, M. & Sinclair, J. A simple empirical N-body potential for transition metals. Philos. Mag. A 50, 45–55 (1984).10.1080/01418618408244210 ↗
50. Ackland, G. & Thetford, R. An improved N-body semi-empirical model for body-centred cubic transition metals. Philos. Mag. A 56, 15–30 (1987).10.1080/01418618708204464 ↗
51. Zhong, Y., Nordlund, K., Ghaly, M. & Averback, R. Defect production in tungsten: a comparison between field-ion microscopy and molecular-dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. B 58, 2361 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.58.2361 ↗
52. Derlet, P. M., Nguyen-Manh, D. & Dudarev, S. Multiscale modeling of crowdion and vacancy defects in body-centered-cubic transition metals. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 76, 054107 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.76.054107 ↗
53. Björkas, C., Nordlund, K. & Dudarev, S. Modelling radiation effects using the ab-initio based tungsten and vanadium potentials. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. 267, 3204–3208 (2009).10.1016/j.nimb.2009.06.123 ↗
54. Juslin, N. & Wirth, B. D. Interatomic potentials for simulation of He bubble formation in W. J. Nucl. Mater. 432, 61–66 (2013).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.07.023 ↗
55. Marinica, M.-C. et al. Interatomic potentials for modelling radiation defects and dislocations in tungsten. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 25, 395502 (2013).10.1088/0953-8984/25/39/395502 ↗
56. Koskenniemi, M., Byggmästar, J., Nordlund, K. & Djurabekova, F. Efficient atomistic simulations of radiation damage in W and W–Mo using machine-learning potentials,. J. Nucl. Mater. 577, 154325 (2023).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154325 ↗
57. Byggmästar, J., Granberg, F. & Nordlund, K. Effects of the short-range repulsive potential on cascade damage in iron. J. Nucl. Mater. 508, 530–539 (2018).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.06.005 ↗
58. Malerba, L. et al. Comparison of empirical interatomic potentials for iron applied to radiation damage studies. J. Nucl. Mater. 406, 19–38 (2010).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.05.017 ↗
59. Marinica, M.-C., Willaime, F. & Crocombette, J.-P. Irradiation-induced formation of nanocrystallites with c 15 laves phase structure in bcc iron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 025501 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.025501 ↗
60. Olsson, P., Becquart, C. & Domain, C. Ab initio threshold displacement energies in iron. Mater. Res. Lett. 4, 219–225 (2016).10.1080/21663831.2016.1181680 ↗
61. Behler, J. Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 170901 (2016).10.1063/1.4971792 ↗
62. Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. On representing chemical environments. Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 ↗
63. Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
64. Smith, J. S., Isayev, O. & Roitberg, A. E. ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost. Chem. Sci. 8, 3192–3203 (2017).10.1039/C6SC05720A ↗
65. Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. Gaussian approximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
66. Glielmo, A., Zeni, C. & De Vita, A. Efficient nonparametric n-body force fields from machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 97, 184307 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.97.184307 ↗
67. Vandermause, J. et al. On-the-fly active learning of interpretable Bayesian force fields for atomistic rare events. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 20 (2020).10.1038/s41524-020-0283-z ↗
68. Thompson, A. P., Swiler, L. P., Trott, C. R., Foiles, S. M. & Tucker, G. J. Spectral neighbor analysis method for automated generation of quantum-accurate interatomic potentials. J. Comput. Phys. 285, 316–330 (2015).10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.018 ↗
69. Shapeev, A. V. Moment tensor potentials: a class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials. Multiscale Modeling Simul. 14, 1153–1173 (2016).10.1137/15M1054183 ↗
70. Deringer, V. L., Caro, M. A. & Csányi, G. Machine learning interatomic potentials as emerging tools for materials science. Adv. Mater. 31, 1902765 (2019).10.1002/adma.201902765 ↗
71. Mueller, T., Hernandez, A., Wang, C. Machine learning for interatomic potential models. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 050902 (2020).10.1063/1.5126336 ↗
72. Chen, C., Deng, Z., Tran, R., Tang, H., Chu, I.-H. & Ong, S. P. Accurate force field for molybdenum by machine learning large materials data. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 043603 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.043603 ↗
73. Wood, M. A., Cusentino, M. A., Wirth, B. D. & Thompson, A. P. Data-driven material models for atomistic simulation. Phys. Rev. B 99, 184305 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.99.184305 ↗
74. Zuo, Y. et al. Performance and cost assessment of machine learning interatomic potentials, the. J. Phys. Chem. A 124, 731–745 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpca.9b08723 ↗
75. Daw, M. S. & Baskes, M. I. Embedded-atom method: derivation and application to impurities, surfaces, and other defects in metals. Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984).10.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
76. Wang, G., Wang, C., Zhang, X., Li, Z., Zhou, J., Sun, Z. Machine learning interatomic potential: Bridge the gap between small-scale models and realistic device-scale simulations. Iscience 27, 109673 (2024).10.1016/j.isci.2024.109673 ↗
77. Schütt, K. T., Arbabzadah, F., Chmiela, S., Müller, K. R. & Tkatchenko, A. Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks. Nat. Commun. 8, 13890 (2017).10.1038/ncomms13890 ↗
78. Nebgen, B. et al. Transferable dynamic molecular charge assignment using deep neural networks. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 14, 4687–4698 (2018).10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00524 ↗
79. Schütt, K., Kindermans, P.-J., Sauceda Felix, H. E., Chmiela, A., Tkatchenko, S., Müller, K.-R. Schnet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactions. Adv. Neural Inform. Proc. Syst. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.08566 (2017).10.48550/arXiv.1706.08566 ↗
80. Wang, H., Zhang, L., Han, J. & Weinan, E. DeePMD-kit: A deep learning package for many-body potential energy representation and molecular dynamics. Comput. Phys. Commun. 228, 178–184 (2018).10.1016/j.cpc.2018.03.016 ↗
81. Xie, T. & Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 145301 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301 ↗
82. Chen, C., Zuo, Y., Ye, W., Li, X. & Ong, S. P. Learning properties of ordered and disordered materials from multi-fidelity data. Nat. Comput. Sci. 1, 46–53 (2021).10.1038/s43588-020-00002-x ↗
83. Park, C. W., Kornbluth, M., Vandermause, J., Wolverton, C., Kozinsky, B. & Mailoa, J. P. Accurate and scalable graph neural network force field and molecular dynamics with direct force architecture. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 73 (2021).10.1038/s41524-021-00543-3 ↗
84. Wang, Z. et al. Symmetry-adapted graph neural networks for constructing molecular dynamics force fields. Sci. China Phys., Mech. Astron. 64, 117211 (2021).10.1007/s11433-021-1739-4 ↗
85. Takamoto, S., Izumi, S. & Li, J. TeaNet: Universal neural network interatomic potential inspired by iterative electronic relaxations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 207, 111280 (2022).10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111280 ↗
86. Gasteiger, J., Becker, F. & Günnemann, S. Gemnet: Universal directional graph neural networks for molecules. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 34, 6790–6802 (2021).
87. Wang, Z. et al. Heterogeneous relational message passing networks for molecular dynamics simulations. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 53 (2022).10.1038/s41524-022-00739-1 ↗
88. Batatia, I., Kovacs, D. P., Simm, G., Ortner, C. & Csányi, G. MACE: Higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force fields. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 11423–11436 (2022).
89. Musaelian, A. et al. Learning local equivariant representations for large-scale atomistic dynamics. Nat. Commun. 14, 579 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-36329-y ↗
90. Deng, B. et al. CHGNet: Pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modeling. Nat Mach Intell. 5, 1031–1041 (2023).10.1038/s42256-023-00716-3 ↗
91. Satorras, V. G., Hoogeboom, E., Welling, M. E (n) equivariant graph neural networks, International conference on machine learning. Proc. 38th International Conference on Machine Learning. 9323–9332 (2021).
92. Batzner, S. et al. E (3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials. Nat. Commun. 13, 2453 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 ↗
93. Qiao, Z., Christensen, A. S., Welborn, M., Manby, F. R., Anandkumar, A. & Miller, T. F. III, Informing geometric deep learning with electronic interactions to accelerate quantum chemistry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2205221119 (2022).10.1073/pnas.2205221119 ↗
94. Allen, A. E., Dusson, G., Ortner, C. & Csányi, G. Atomic permutationally invariant polynomials for fitting molecular force fields. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2, 025017 (2021).10.1088/2632-2153/abd51e ↗
95. Christensen, A. S., Bratholm, L. A., Faber, F. A., Anatole, O. von Lilienfeld, FCHL revisited: faster and more accurate quantum machine learning. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 044107 (2020).10.1063/1.5126701 ↗
96. Thölke, P., De Fabritiis, G. Torchmd-net: equivariant transformers for neural network based molecular potentials. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.025 (2022).10.48550/arXiv.2202.025 ↗
97. Belsky, A., Hellenbrandt, M., Karen, V. L. & Luksch, P. New developments in the inorganic crystal structure database (ICSD): accessibility in support of materials research and design. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Sci. 58, 364–369 (2002).10.1107/S0108768102006948 ↗
98. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
99. Curtarolo, S. et al. AFLOW: An automatic framework for high-throughput materials discovery. Comput. Mater. Sci. 58, 218–226 (2012).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.005 ↗
100. Pizzi, G., Cepellotti, A., Sabatini, R., Marzari, N. & Kozinsky, B. AiiDA: automated interactive infrastructure and database for computational science. Comput. Mater. Sci. 111, 218–230 (2016).10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.013 ↗