journal article·2025-06-18Open access

Bayesian optimization of biodegradable polymers via machine learning driven features from low-field NMR data

Ryo Fujita, Yoshifumi Amamoto, Jun Kikuchi

npj Materials Degradation· Volume 9· Issue 1

Abstract

Effective designs of biodegradable polymers are highly desirable for achieving a sustainable society by decreasing environmental burden and replacing petroleum-based resources with biomass. Low-field NMR is one of the candidate techniques because it provides information on the higher-order structure and dynamics of polymers quickly and conveniently. Although machine learning approaches such as Bayesian optimization (BO) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are significant, there have been almost no reports on effective material design based on low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data. This study proposes a method for optimizing polymer process conditions using CNN-based features extracted from relaxation curves. This approach identified important features related to material properties while reconstructing denoised relaxation curves of polylactic acid. BO of process conditions using these features achieved an optimization rate comparable to using material property values, suggesting that effective material design is possible without directly evaluating a large number of properties. This might be potentially insightful for the feasibility of a framework to accelerate polymer development through low-field NMR with minimal property data.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · NMR spectroscopy and applications · Fuel Cells and Related Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Mohanty, A. K. et al. Sustainable polymers. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 2, 46 (2022).10.1038/s43586-022-00124-8 ↗
2. Gbadeyan, O. J., Linganiso, L. Z. & Deenadayalu, N. Thermomechanical characterization of bioplastic films produced using a combination of polylactic acid and bionano calcium carbonate. Sci. Rep. 12, 15538 (2022).10.1038/s41598-022-20004-1 ↗
3. Guicherd, M. et al. An engineered enzyme embedded into PLA to make self-biodegradable plastic. Nature 631, 884–890 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07709-1 ↗
4. Samir, A., Ashour, F. H., Hakim, A. A. A. & Bassyouni, M. Recent advances in biodegradable polymers for sustainable applications. npj Mater. Degrad. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-022-00277-7 (2022).10.1038/s41529-022-00277-7 ↗
5. Diwale, S. et al. Bayesian optimization for material discovery processes with noise. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 7, 622–636 (2022).10.1039/D1ME00154J ↗
6. Noguchi, S. & Inoue, J. Bayesian inverse inference of material properties from microstructure images. Comput. Mater. Sci. 245, 113306 (2024).10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113306 ↗
7. Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. & Kim, C. Machine learning in materials informatics: Recent applications and prospects. npj Comput. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
8. Chitturi, S. R. et al. Targeted materials discovery using Bayesian algorithm execution. NPJ Comput Mater. 10, 156 (2024).10.1038/s41524-024-01326-2 ↗
9. Herbol, H. C., Poloczek, M. & Clancy, P. Cost-effective materials discovery: Bayesian optimization across multiple information sources. Mater. Horiz. 7, 2113–2123 (2020).10.1039/D0MH00062K ↗
10. Pai, S. M. et al. Machine learning applied to the design and optimization of polymeric materials: a review. Materials 7, 100449 (2025).
11. Patra, T. K. Data-driven methods for accelerating polymer design. ACS Polym. Au 2, 8–26 (2022).10.1021/acspolymersau.1c00035 ↗
12. Amamoto, Y. Data-driven approaches for structure-property relationships in polymer science for prediction and understanding. Polymer J. 54, 957–967 (2022).10.1038/s41428-022-00648-6 ↗
13. Fukazawa, T., Ikegami, T., Kawata, M. & Miyake, T. Materials secure computation with secret sharing: a Bayesian optimization scheme and its performance. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 94, 013801 (2025).10.7566/JPSJ.94.013801 ↗
14. Luo, S. H. et al. A machine learning framework for low-field NMR data processing. Pet. Sci. 19, 581–593 (2022).10.1016/j.petsci.2022.02.001 ↗
15. Luo, G., Xiao, L., Luo, S., Liao, G. & Shao, R. A study on multi-exponential inversion of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation data using deep learning. J. Magn. Reson. 346, 107358 (2023).10.1016/j.jmr.2022.107358 ↗
16. Nakashima, Y. & Shiba, N. Nondestructive measurement of intramuscular fat content of fresh beef meat by a hand-held magnetic resonance sensor. Int. J. Food Prop. 24, 1722–1736 (2021).10.1080/10942912.2021.1999261 ↗
17. da Silva Ruiz, N. M. et al. Time domain NMR evaluation of thermal and thermochemical aging of nitrile rubber on crosslinking and mechanical properties. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 224, 110727 (2024).10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2024.110727 ↗
18. Blümich, B. et al. Unilateral nuclear magnetic resonance for quality control: the NMR-MOUSE. Spectroscopy 18, 24–54 (2003).
19. Yamada, S., Kurotani, A., Chikayama, E. & Kikuchi, J. Signal deconvolution and noise factor analysis based on a combination of time–frequency analysis and probabilistic sparse matrix factorization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2978 (2020).10.3390/ijms21082978 ↗
20. Besghini, D., Mauri, M. & Simonutti, R. Time domain NMR in polymer science: from the laboratory to the industry. Appl. Sci. 9, 1801 (2019).10.3390/app9091801 ↗
21. Okada, M., Amamoto, Y. & Kikuchi, J. Designing sustainable hydrophilic interfaces via feature selection from molecular descriptors and time-domain nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation curves. Polymers 16, 824 (2024).10.3390/polym16060824 ↗
22. Matlahov, I. & van der Wel, P. C. A. Hidden motions and motion-induced invisibility: dynamics-based spectral editing in solid-state NMR. Methods 148, 123–135 (2018).10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.04.015 ↗
23. Hara, K., Yamada, S., Kurotani, A., Chikayama, E. & Kikuchi, J. Materials informatics approach using domain modelling for exploring structure–property relationships of polymers. Sci. Rep. 12, 10558 (2022).10.1038/s41598-022-14394-5 ↗
24. Srikanth, M., Sandeep, T. S. R. S., Sucharitha, K. & Godi, S. Biodegradation of plastic polymers by fungi: a brief review. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 9, 42 (2022).10.1186/s40643-022-00532-4 ↗
25. Mierzwa-Hersztek, M., Gondek, K. & Kopeć, M. Degradation of polyethylene and biocomponent-derived polymer materials: an overview. J. Polym. Environ. 27, 600–611 (2019).10.1007/s10924-019-01368-4 ↗
26. Plota, A. & Masek, A. Lifetime prediction methods for degradable polymeric materials—a short review. Materials 13, 4507 (2020).10.3390/ma13204507 ↗
27. Zhou, Z. et al. A machine learning model for textured X-ray scattering and diffraction image denoising. NPJ Comput. Mater. 9, 58 (2023).10.1038/s41524-023-01011-w ↗
28. Gómez-Bombarelli, R. et al. Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of molecules. ACS Cent. Sci. 4, 268–276 (2018).10.1021/acscentsci.7b00572 ↗
29. Ma, B. et al. Effect of poly(lactic acid) crystallization on its mechanical and heat resistance performances. Polymer 212, 123280 (2021).10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123280 ↗
30. Hu, J., Shen, L., Albanie, S., Sun, G. & Wu, E. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 42, 2011–2023 (2017).10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2913372 ↗
31. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 770–778 (2016).10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
32. Wang, J. et al. Estimating the relative crystallinity of biodegradable polylactic acid and polyglycolide polymer composites by machine learning methodologies. Polymers 14, 527 (2022).10.3390/polym14030527 ↗
33. Omigbodun, F. T., Osa-Uwagboe, N., Udu, A. G. & Oladapo, B. I. Leveraging machine learning for optimized mechanical properties and 3D printing of PLA/cHAP for bone implant. Biomimetics 9, 587 (2024).10.3390/biomimetics9100587 ↗
34. Yamada, S., Tsuboi, Y., Yokoyama, D. & Kikuchi, J. Polymer composition optimization approach based on feature extraction of bound and free water using time-domain nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Magn. Reson. 351, 107438 (2023).10.1016/j.jmr.2023.107438 ↗
35. Takamura, A., Tsukamoto, K., Sakata, K. & Kikuchi, J. Integrative measurement analysis via machine learning descriptor selection for investigating physical properties of biopolymers in hairs. Sci. Rep. 11, 24359 (2021).10.1038/s41598-021-03793-9 ↗
36. Leniak, A., Pietruś, W., Świderska, A. & Kurczab, R. From NMR to AI: do we need 1H NMR experimental spectra to obtain high-quality logD prediction models?. J. Chem. Inf. Model 65, 2924–2939 (2025).10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02145 ↗
37. Casado, U. M., Altuna, F. I. & Miccio, L. A. Towards sustainable material design: a comparative analysis of latent space representations in AI models. Sustainability 16, 10681 (2024).10.3390/su162310681 ↗
38. Kuenneth, C. & Ramprasad, R. polyBERT: a chemical language model to enable fully machine-driven ultrafast polymer informatics. Nat. Commun. 14, 4099 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-39868-6 ↗
39. Gurnani, R. et al. PolyG2G: a novel machine learning algorithm applied to the generative design of polymer dielectrics. Chem. Mater. 33, 7008–7016 (2021).10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02061 ↗
40. Hu, J., Li, Z., Lin, J. & Zhang, L. Prediction and Interpretability of glass transition temperature of homopolymers by data-augmented graph convolutional neural networks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 54006–54017 (2023).10.1021/acsami.3c13698 ↗
41. Azam, S. et al. Using feature maps to unpack the CNN ‘Black box’ theory with two medical datasets of different modality. Intell. Syst. Appl. 18, 200233 (2023).
42. Batra, R. et al. Polymers for extreme conditions designed using syntax-directed variational autoencoders. Chem. Mater. 32, 10489–10500 (2020).10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03332 ↗
43. Szandała, T. Unlocking the black box of CNNs: visualising the decision-making process with PRISM. Inf. Sci. 642, 119162 (2023).10.1016/j.ins.2023.119162 ↗
44. Yamawaki, R., Tei, A., Ito, K. & Kikuchi, J. Decomposition factor analysis based on virtual experiments throughout Bayesian optimization for compost-degradable polymers. Appl. Sci. 11, 2820 (2021).10.3390/app11062820 ↗
45. Atasi, C., Kern, J. & Ramprasad, R. Design of recyclable plastics with machine learning and genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 64, 9249–9259 (2024).10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01530 ↗
46. Rotem, O. et al. Visual interpretability of image-based classification models by generative latent space disentanglement applied to in vitro fertilization. Nat. Commun. 15, 7390 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-51136-9 ↗
47. Asakura, T., Date, Y. & Kikuchi, J. Application of ensemble deep neural network to metabolomics studies. Anal. Chim. Acta 1037, 230–236 (2018).10.1016/j.aca.2018.02.045 ↗
48. Date, Y. & Kikuchi, J. Application of a deep neural network to metabolomics studies and its performance in determining important variables. Anal. Chem. 90, 1805–1810 (2018).10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03795 ↗
49. Pedregosa FABIANPEDREGOSA, F. et al. Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python Gaël Varoquaux Bertrand Thirion Vincent Dubourg Alexandre Passos PEDREGOSA, VAROQUAUX, GRAMFORT ET AL. Matthieu Perrot. J. Mach. Learn. Res. http://scikit-learn.sourceforge.net. (2011).