Unprotected sidewalls of implantable silicon-based neural probes and conformal coating as a solution
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Silicon-based implantable neural devices have great translational potential as a means to deliver various treatments for neurological disorders. However, they are currently held back by uncertain longevity following chronic exposure to body fluids. Conventional deposition techniques cover only the horizontal surfaces which contain active electronics, electrode sites, and conducting traces. As a result, a vast majority of today’s silicon devices leave their vertical sidewalls exposed without protection. In this work, we investigated two batch-process silicon dioxide deposition methods separately and in combination: atomic layer deposition and inductively-coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition. We then utilized a rapid soak test involving potassium hydroxide to evaluate the coverage quality of each protection strategy. Focused ion beam cross sectioning, scanning electron microscopy, and 3D extrapolation enabled us to characterize and quantify the effectiveness of the deposition methods. Results showed that bare silicon sidewalls suffered the most dissolution whereas ALD silicon dioxide provided the best protection, demonstrating its effectiveness as a promising batch process technique to mitigate silicon sidewall corrosion in chronic applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Najafi, K., Ji, J. & Wise, K. D. Scaling limitations of silicon multichannel recording probes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 37, 111 (1990).
2. Nambiar, A., Nolta, N. F. & Han, M. 3D Reconstruction of the intracortical volume around a hybrid microelectrode array. Front. Neurosci. 13, 393 (2019).10.3389/fnins.2019.00393 ↗
3. Frey, O. et al. Enzyme-based choline and L-glutamate biosensor electrodes on silicon microprobe arrays. Biosens. Bioelectron. 26, 477–484 (2010).10.1016/j.bios.2010.07.073 ↗
4. Son, Y. et al. In vivo optical modulation of neural signals using monolithically integrated two-dimensional neural probe arrays. Sci. Rep. 5, 15466 (2015).10.1038/srep15466 ↗
5. Song, E. et al. Flexible electronic/optoelectronic microsystems with scalable designs for chronic biointegration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 15398–15406 (2019).10.1073/pnas.1907697116 ↗
6. Seidl, K. et al. In-plane silicon probes for simultaneous neural recording and drug delivery. J. Micromech. Microeng. 20, 105006 (2010).10.1088/0960-1317/20/10/105006 ↗
7. Wellman, S. M. et al. A materials roadmap to functional neural interface design. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1701269 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201701269 ↗
8. Turner, J. N. et al. Cerebral astrocyte response to micromachined silicon implants. Exp. Neurol. 156, 33–49 (1999).10.1006/exnr.1998.6983 ↗
9. Kewley, D. T. et al. Plasma-etched neural probes. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 58, 27–35 (1997).10.1016/S0924-4247(97)80221-X ↗
10. Norlin, P., Kindlundh, M., Mouroux, A., Yoshida, K. & Hofmann, U. G. A 32-site neural recording probe fabricated by DRIE of SOI substrates. J. Micromech. Microeng. 12, 414–419 (2002).10.1088/0960-1317/12/4/312 ↗
11. Cheung, K. C., Djupsund, K., Dan, Y. & Lee, L. P. Implantable multichannel electrode array based on SOI technology. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 12, 179–184 (2003).10.1109/JMEMS.2003.809962 ↗
12. Han, M., & McCreery, D. B. A new chronic neural probe with electroplated iridium oxide microelectrodes. Ann. int. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 4220-4221 (2008).10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650140 ↗
13. Han, M., Manoonkitiwongsa, P. S., Wang, C. X. & McCreery, D. B. In vivo validation of custom-designed silicon-based microelectrode arrays for long-term neural recording and stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 59, 346–354 (2012).10.1109/TBME.2011.2172440 ↗
14. Wise, K. D., Anderson, D. J., Hetke, J. F., Kipke, D. R. & Najafi, K. Wireless implantable microsystems: high-density electronic interfaces to the nervous system. Proc. IEEE 92, 76–97 (2004).10.1109/JPROC.2003.820544 ↗
15. Ruther, P., Herwik, S., Kisban, S., Seidl, K. & Paul, O. Recent progress in neural probes using silicon MEMS technology. IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng. 5, 505–515 (2010).10.1002/tee.20566 ↗
16. Du, J. G., Blanche, T. J., Harrison, R. R., Lester, H. A. & Masmanidis, S. C. Multiplexed, high density electrophysiology with nanofabricated neural probes. PLoS ONE 6, 11 (2011).
17. Angotzi, G. N. et al. SiNAPS: an implantable active pixel sensor CMOS-probe for simultaneous large-scale neural recordings. Biosens. Bioelectron. 126, 355–364 (2019).10.1016/j.bios.2018.10.032 ↗
18. Jun, J. J. et al. Fully integrated silicon probes for high-density recording of neural activity. Nature 551, 232–236 (2017).10.1038/nature24636 ↗
19. Steinmetz, N. A., Koch, C., Harris, K. D. & Carandini, M. Challenges and opportunities for large-scale electrophysiology with Neuropixels probes. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 50, 92–100 (2018).10.1016/j.conb.2018.01.009 ↗
20. McCreery, D., Kamal, Y. & Martin, H. Responses of neurons in the feline inferior colliculus to modulated electrical stimuli applied on and within the ventral cochlear nucleus; Implications for an advanced auditory brainstem implant. Hear. Res. 363, 85–97 (2018).10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.009 ↗
21. Flesher, S. N. et al. Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 361 (2016).10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf8083 ↗
22. Hämmerle, H. et al. Biostability of micro-photodiode arrays for subretinal implantation. Biomaterials 23, 797–804 (2002).10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00185-5 ↗
23. Badia, J. et al. Biocompatibility of chronically implanted transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrode (TIME) in the rat sciatic nerve. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58, 2324–2332 (2011).10.1109/TBME.2011.2153850 ↗
24. Fu, T. M., Hong, G., Viveros, R. D., Zhou, T. & Lieber, C. M. Highly scalable multichannel mesh electronics for stable chronic brain electrophysiology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E10046–E10055 (2017).10.1073/pnas.1717695114 ↗
25. Kozai, T. D. et al. Mechanical failure modes of chronically implanted planar silicon-based neural probes for laminar recording. Biomaterials 37, 25–39 (2015).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.040 ↗
26. Hwang, S. W. et al. 25th anniversary article: materials for high‐performance biodegradable semiconductor devices. Adv. Mater. 26, 1992–2000 (2014).10.1002/adma.201304821 ↗
27. Hwang, S. W. et al. Dissolution chemistry and biocompatibility of single-crystalline silicon nanomembranes and associated materials for transient electronics. ACS Nano 8, 5843–5851 (2014).10.1021/nn500847g ↗
28. Fang, H. et al. Ultrathin, transferred layers of thermally grown silicon dioxide as biofluid barriers for biointegrated flexible electronic systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11682–11687 (2016).10.1073/pnas.1605269113 ↗
29. Edell, D. J., Toi, V. V., McNeil, V. M. & Clark, L. D. Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39, 635–643 (1992).10.1109/10.141202 ↗
30. Maloney, J. M., Lipka, S. A., and Baldwin, S. P. In vivo biostability of CVD silicon oxide and silicon nitride films. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 872, https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-872-J14.3 (2005).10.1557/PROC-872-J14.3 ↗
31. Petersen, K. E. Silicon as a mechanical material. Proc. IEEE 70, 420–457 (1982).10.1109/PROC.1982.12331 ↗
32. Williams, K. R. & Muller, R. S. Etch rates for micromachining processing. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 5, 256–269 (1996).10.1109/84.546406 ↗
33. Minnikanti, S. et al. Lifetime assessment of atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3-Parylene C bilayer coating for neural interfaces using accelerated age testing and electrochemical characterization. Acta Biomater. 10, 960–967 (2014).10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.031 ↗
34. Hukins, D. W. L., Mahomed, A. & Kukureka, S. N. Accelerated aging for testing polymeric biomaterials and medical devices. Med. Eng. Phys. 30, 1270–1274 (2008).10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.06.001 ↗
35. Takmakov, P. et al. Rapid evaluation of the durability of cortical neural implants using accelerated aging with reactive oxygen species. J. Neural Eng. 12, 026003 (2015).10.1088/1741-2560/12/2/026003 ↗
36. Eulitz, M. & Reiss, G. 3D reconstruction of SEM images by use of optical photogrammetry software. J. Struct. Biol. 191, 190–196 (2015).10.1016/j.jsb.2015.06.010 ↗
37. Dos Santos, Q. M., Dzika, E. & Avenant-Oldewage, A. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to study morphology and morphometry of the isolated haptoral sclerites of three distinct diplozoid species. PloS One 14, e0211794 (2019).10.1371/journal.pone.0211794 ↗
38. Lee, J. H. et al. Investigation of silicon oxide thin films prepared by atomic layer deposition using SiH2Cl2 and O3 as the precursors. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 43, L328 (2004).10.1143/JJAP.43.L328 ↗
39. Mackenzie, K. D., Lee, J. W., and Johnson, D. Inductively-coupled plasma deposition of low temperature silicon dioxide and silicon nitride films for III–V applications. In Proc. 30th Symp. State-of-the-Art Progr. Comp. Semicond., 1–12 (1999).
40. Pfeiffer, K. et al. Comparative study of ALD SiO2 thin films for optical applications. Opt. Mater. Express 6, 660–670 (2016).10.1364/OME.6.000660 ↗
41. King, S. W. Plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition of SiN x: H and SiO2. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 29, 041501 (2011).10.1116/1.3584790 ↗
42. Lee, J. W. et al. Low temperature silicon nitride and silicon dioxide film processing by inductively coupled plasma chemical vapor deposition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 1481 (2000).10.1149/1.1393382 ↗
43. Caldwell, R. et al. Analysis of Al2O3—Parylene C bilayer coatings and impact of microelectrode topography on long term stability of implantable neural arrays. J. Neural Eng. 14, 046011 (2017).10.1088/1741-2552/aa69d3 ↗
44. McCreery, D., Han, M., Pikov, V., Yadav, K. & Pannu, S. Encoding of the amplitude modulation of pulsatile electrical stimulation in the feline cochlear nucleus by neurons in the inferior colliculus; effects of stimulus pulse rate. J. Neural Eng. 10, 056010 (2013).10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056010 ↗
45. Pikov, V., McCreery, D. B. & Han, M. Intraspinal stimulation with a silicon-based 3D chronic microelectrode array for bladder voiding in cats. J. Neural Eng. 17, 065004 (2020).
46. Nolta, N. F., Ghelich, P., & Han, M. Recessed traces for planarized passivation of chronic neural microelectrodes. Annu. Int. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 5125–5128 (2019).10.1109/EMBC.2019.8857171 ↗
47. Nolta, N. F., Ghelich, P., Ersoz, A. & Han, M. Fabrication and modeling of recessed traces for silicon-based neural microelectrodes. J. Neural Eng. 17, 056003 (2020).10.1088/1741-2552/abb9bd ↗
48. McCreery, D., Han, M. & Pikov, V. Neuronal activity evoked in the inferior colliculus of the cat by surface macroelectrodes and penetrating microelectrodes implanted in the cochlear nucleus. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57, 1765–1773 (2010).10.1109/TBME.2010.2046169 ↗
49. Williams, K. R., Gupta, K. & Wasilik, M. Etch rates for micromachining processing-Part II. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 12, 761–778 (2003).10.1109/JMEMS.2003.820936 ↗
50. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).10.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗