Safe management of the UK separated plutonium inventory: a challenge of materials degradation
Source abstract
Abstract
The UK holds the largest inventory, worldwide, of separated plutonium under civil safeguards. Here, the importance of materials degradation in managing this inventory to a safe and secure end point is reviewed, together with recent developments, in the context of storage, reuse and immobilisation and disposal.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Radioactive element chemistry and processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, 2019. Progress on Plutonium Consolidation, Storage and Disposition, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/791046/Progress_on_Plutonium.pdf (2019).
2. Hyatt, N. C. Plutonium management policy in the United Kingdom: the need for a dual track strategy. Energy Policy 101, 303–309 (2017).10.1016/j.enpol.2016.08.033 ↗
3. Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2011. Management of the UK’s plutonium stocks: a consultation on the long-term management of UK owned separated civil plutonium, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/42766/1243-uk-plutonium-stocks.pdf (2011).
4. Department of Energy and Climate Change, 2013. Management of the UK’s plutonium stocks: consultation response, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/42773/3694-govt-resp-mgmt-of-uk-plutonium-stocks.pdf (2013).
5. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, 2010. Plutonium—Credible Options Analysis (Gate A), Sms/TS/B1-PLUT/002/A, https://www.nda.gov.uk/publication/plutonium-credible-options-analysis-redacted-2010 (2010).
6. Morrison, S. L. & Parks, G. T. The effect of Am241 on UK plutonium recycle options in thorium-plutonium fuelled LWRs—Part I: PWRs. Ann. Nucl. Energy 135, 106952 (2020).10.1016/j.anucene.2019.106952 ↗
7. Morrison, S. L. & Parks, G. T. The effect of Am241 on UK plutonium recycle options in thorium-plutonium fuelled LWRs—Part II: BWRs. Ann. Nucl. Energy 135, 106974 (2020).10.1016/j.anucene.2019.106974 ↗
8. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2018. Uranium 2018: Resources, Production and Demand, NEA 7413, http://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2018/7413-uranium-2018.pdf (2018).
9. Blackburn, L. R. et al. A systematic investigation of the phase assemblage and microstructure of the zirconolite CaZr1-xCexTi2O7 system. J. Nucl. Mater. 535, 152137 (2020).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152137 ↗
10. Thornber, S. M. et al. A preliminary validation study of PuO2 incorporation into zirconolite glass-ceramics. MRS Adv. 3, 1065–1071 (2019).10.1557/adv.2018.109 ↗
11. Thornber, S. M., Heath, P. G., Da Costa, G. P., Stennett, M. C. & Hyatt, N. C. The effect of pre-treatment parameters on the quality of glass-ceramic wasteforms for plutonium immobilisation, consolidated by hot isostatic pressing. J. Nucl. Mater. 485, 253–261 (2017).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.12.028 ↗
12. Squire, J., Maddrell, E. R., Hyatt, N. C. & Stennett, M. C. Influence of lubricants and attrition milling parameters on the quality of zirconolite ceramics, consolidated by hot isostatic pressing, for immobilization of plutonium. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 12, 92–104 (2015).10.1111/ijac.12239 ↗
13. Maddrell, E. R., Thornber, S. & Hyatt, N. C. The influence of glass composition on crystalline phase stability in glass-ceramic wasteforms. J. Nucl. Mater. 456, 461–266 (2015).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.10.010 ↗
14. Maddrell, E. Hot isostatically pressed wasteforms for future nuclear fuel cycles. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 91, 735–741 (2013).10.1016/j.cherd.2012.11.004 ↗
15. Ewing, R. C. Plutonium and “minor” actinides: safe sequestration. Earth Planet. Sc. Lett. 229, 165–181 (2005).10.1016/j.epsl.2004.11.017 ↗
16. Ewing, R. C. Ceramic matrices for plutonium disposition. Prog. Nucl. Energ. 49, 635–643 (2007).10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.02.003 ↗
17. Gardner, L. J., Walling, S. A. & Hyatt, N. C. Hot isostatic pressing: thermal treatment trials of inactive and radioactive simulant UK intermediate level waste. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 818, 012009 (2020).10.1088/1757-899X/818/1/012009 ↗
18. Macfarlane, A. M. Another option for separated plutonium management: Storage MOX. Prog. Nucl. Energ. 49, 644–650 (2007).10.1016/j.pnucene.2007.02.001 ↗
19. Sims, H. E., Webb, K. J., Brown, J., Morris, D. & Taylor, R. J. Hydrogen yields from water on the surface of plutonium dioxide. J. Nucl. Mater. 437, 359–364 (2013).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.02.040 ↗
20. Haschke, J. M., Allen, T. H. & Morales, L. A. Reaction of plutonium dioxide with water: formation and properties of PuO2+x. Science 287, 385–387 (2000).10.1126/science.287.5451.285 ↗
21. Ronchi, C. & Hiernault, J. P. Helium diffusion in uranium and plutonium oxides. J. Nucl. Mater. 325, 1–12 (2004).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.10.006 ↗
22. Sutherland-Harper, S. et al. Characterisation and heat treatment of chloride-contaminated and humidified PuO2 samples. J. Nucl. Mater. 509, 654–666 (2018).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.07.031 ↗
23. Webb, K. et al. Thermal Processing of Chloride-Contaminated Plutonium Dioxide. ACS Omega 4, 12524–12536 (2019).10.1021/acsomega.9b00719 ↗
24. Thornber, S. M. Solubility, speciation and local environment of chlorine in zirconolite glass-ceramics for the immobilisation of plutonium residues. RSC Adv. 10, 32497–32510 (2020).10.1039/D0RA04938G ↗
25. Nuclear Decommissioning Authority, 2019. Pressure treatment for plutonium stockpile, https://www.gov.uk/government/case-studies/pressure-treatment-for-plutonium-stockpile (2019).