Thermodynamic evaluation of the aerial and aqueous oxidation of Al – Mg, Al – Si and Al – Mg – Si system alloys at 298 K
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Aluminum and magnesium are the lightest structural metals, and therefore, various alloys based on them are widely used in both, automotive and aerospace industries. However, aluminum and magnesium are very easily affected by atmospheric and aqueous corrosion, and, therefore, the alloying elements should enhance their corrosion stability. In this work, the thermodynamic analysis of phase and chemical equilibria involving aluminum and magnesium alloys doped with silicon in oxygen–containing air environments, as well as the analysis of chemical and electrochemical equilibria involving these alloys in aqueous environments is conducted. The phase and chemical equiliibria in the Al–Mg, Al–Si, Mg–Si, and Al–Mg–Si systems at 298 K are considered, and the thermodynamic activities of the components of common Al–Mg–Si system alloys are calculated. The invariant chemical equilibria in the systems Al–Mg–O, Al–Si–O, Mg–Si–O at 298 K are considered, the isothermal section of the state diagrams of these systems are plotted, and the oxidation scheme of the Al–Mg–Si system alloys in excess oxygen is proposed. The chemical and electrochemical equilibria in the Al–Mg–Si–H2O system at 298 K are considered and presented in form of the activity – pH and the potential – pH diagrams, and the oxidation of the Al–Mg–Si system alloys in aqueous environments is discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Rambabu, P., Eswara Prasad, N., Kutumbarao, V. V. & Wanhill, R. J. H. Aluminium Alloys for Aerospace Applications. In: Aerospace Materials and Material Technologies (eds. Eswara Prasad, N., & Wanhill, R. J. H.) 29–52; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2134-3_2 (Springer Singapore, 2017).10.1007/978-981-10-2134-3_2 ↗
2. Heinz, A. et al. Recent development in aluminium alloys for aerospace applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 280, 102–107 (2000).10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00674-7 ↗
3. Miller, W. et al. Recent development in aluminium alloys for the automotive industry. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 280, 37–49 (2000).10.1016/S0921-5093(99)00653-X ↗
4. Fridlyander, I. N. et al. Aluminum alloys: Promising materials in the automotive industry. Metal Sci. Heat Treat 44, 365–370 (2002).10.1023/A:1021901715578 ↗
5. Davis, J. R. Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys. In: Alloying: Understanding the Basics (ed. Davis, J. R.) 351–416; https://doi.org/10.1361/autb2001p351 (ASM International, 2001).10.1361/autb2001p351 ↗
6. Røyset, J. & Ryum, N. Scandium in aluminium alloys. Int. Mater. Rev. 50, 19–44 (2005).10.1179/174328005X14311 ↗
7. Dorin, T., Ramajayam, M., Vahid, A. & Langan, T. Chapter 12 – Aluminium Scandium Alloys. In: Fundamentals of Aluminium Metallurgy. Recent Advances. Woodhead Publishing Series in Metals and Surface Engineering (ed. Lumley, R. N.), 439–494; https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102063-0.00012-6 (Woodhead Publishing, 2018).10.1016/B978-0-08-102063-0.00012-6 ↗
8. Wendt, A., Weiss, K., Ben–Dov, A., Bamberger, M. & Bronfin, B. Magnesium Castings in Aeronautics Applications — Special Requirements. In: Essential Readings in Magnesium Technology (eds Mathaudhu, S. N., Luo, A. A., Neelameggham, N. R., Nyberg, E. A. & Sillekens, W. H.) 65–69; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48099-2_9 (Springer, Cham, 2016).10.1007/978-3-319-48099-2_9 ↗
9. Furuya, H., Kogiso, N., Matunaga, S. & Senda, K. Applications of magnesium alloys for aerospace structure systems. Mater. Sci. Forum 350–351, 341–348 (2000).10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.350-351.341 ↗
10. Luo, A. A. & Sachdev, A. K. 12 – Applications of magnesium alloys in automotive engineering. In: Advances in Wrought Magnesium Alloys. Fundamentals of Processing, Properties and Applications. Woodhead Publishing Series in Metals and Surface Engineering (eds Bettles, C. & Barnett, M.) 393–426; https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857093844.3.393 (Woodhead Publishing, 2012).10.1533/9780857093844.3.393 ↗
11. Kulekci, M. K. Magnesium and its alloys applications in automotive industry. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 39, 851–865 (2007).10.1007/s00170-007-1279-2 ↗
12. Sameer Kumar, D., Tara Sasanka, C., Ravindra, K. & Suman, K. N. S. Magnesium and Its Alloys in Automotive Applications – A Review. Am. J. Mater. Sci. Tech. 4, 12–30 (2015).
13. Knipling, K., Dunand, D. & Seidman, D. Nucleation and precipitation strengthening in dilute Al–Ti and Al–Zr Alloys. Metal. Mater. Trans. A 38, 2552–2563 (2007).10.1007/s11661-007-9283-6 ↗
14. Fuller, C. B., Krause, A. R., Dunand, D. C. & Seidman, D. N. Microstructure and mechanical properties of a 5754 aluminum alloy modified by Sc and Zr additions. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 338, 8–16 (2002).10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00056-4 ↗
15. Parvizi, R., Tan, M. Y. & Hughes, A. E. Chapter 14 – Recent insights into corrosion initiation at the nanoscale. In: Fundamentals of Aluminium Metallurgy. Recent Advances. Woodhead Publishing Series in Metals and Surface Engineering (ed Lumley, R. N.) 525–551; https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102063-0.00014-X (Woodhead Publishing, 2018).10.1016/B978-0-08-102063-0.00014-X ↗
16. Davis, J. R. Corrosion of aluminum and aluminum alloys (ASM International, 1999).10.31399/asm.tb.caaa.9781627082990 ↗
17. Ghali, E. Corrosion resistance of aluminum and magnesium alloys: understanding, performance, and testing; https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470531778 (John Wiley & Sons, 2010).10.1002/9780470531778 ↗
18. Zeng, R. C. et al. Review of studies on corrosion of magnesium alloys. Trans. Non–Ferr. Met. Soc. Chi. 16, s763–s771 (2006).10.1016/S1003-6326(06)60297-5 ↗
19. Birbilis, N. & Buchheit, R. G. Investigation and discussion of characteristics for intermetallic phases common to aluminum alloys as a function of solution pH. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, C117–C126 (2008).10.1149/1.2829897 ↗
20. Velikokhatnyi, O. I. & Kumta, P. N. First–principles studies on alloying and simplified thermodynamic aqueous chemical stability of calcium-, zinc-, aluminum-, yttrium- and iron-doped magnesium alloys. Acta Biomater 6, 1698–1704 (2010).10.1016/j.actbio.2009.08.016 ↗
21. Li, G. H., Pan, S. P., Qin, J. Y., Zhang, Z. H. & Wang, W. M. Insight into thermodynamics and corrosion behavior of Al–Ni–Gd glassy alloys from atomic structure. Cor. Sci 66, 360–368 (2013).10.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.043 ↗
22. Anaee, R. A. M. Thermodynamic and kinetic study for corrosion of Al–Si–Cu/Y2O3 composites. Asian J. Chem. 26, 4469–4474 (2014).10.14233/ajchem.2014.17005 ↗
23. Kuchariková, L., Liptáková, T., Tillová, E., Kajánek, D. & Schmidová, E. Role of chemical composition in corrosion of aluminum alloys. Metals 8, 581 (2018).10.3390/met8080581 ↗
24. Esmaily, M. et al. Fundamentals and advances in magnesium alloy corrosion. Progr. Mater. Sci. 89, 92–193 (2017).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.04.011 ↗
25. Limmer, K. R., Williams, K. S., Labukas, J. P. & Andzelm, J. W. First principles modeling of cathodic reaction thermodynamics in dilute magnesium alloys. Corrosion 73, 506–517 (2017).10.5006/2274 ↗
26. Kozeschnik, E. Mean–Field Microstructure Kinetics Modeling. In: Encyclopedia of Materials: Metals and Alloys. (ed Caballero, F. G.) Vol. 4 521–526; https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819726-4.00055-7 (Elsevier, 2022).10.1016/B978-0-12-819726-4.00055-7 ↗
27. Hildebrand, J. H. A quantitative treatment of deviations from Raoult’s law. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 13, 267–272 (1927).10.1073/pnas.13.5.267 ↗
28. Redlich, O. & Kister, A. T. Algebraic representation of thermodynamic properties and the classification of solutions. Ind. Eng. Chem. 40, 345–348 (1948).10.1021/ie50458a036 ↗
29. Aluminium alloy. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aluminium_alloy&oldid=1149516425.
30. Zhong, Y., Yang, M. & Liu, Z. K. Contribution of first–principles energetics to Al–Mg thermodynamic modeling. Calphad 29, 303–311 (2005).10.1016/j.calphad.2005.08.004 ↗
31. Liang, P. et al. Experimental investigation and thermodynamic calculation of the Al–Mg–Zn system. Thermochim. Acta 314, 87–110 (1998).10.1016/S0040-6031(97)00458-9 ↗
32. Zuo, Y. & Chang, Y. A. Thermodynamic calculation of the Al–Mg phase diagram. Calphad 17, 161–174 (1993).10.1016/0364-5916(93)90017-6 ↗
33. Saunders, N. A review and thermodynamic assessment of the Al–Mg and Mg–Li systems. Calphad 14, 61–70 (1990).10.1016/0364-5916(90)90040-7 ↗
34. Liu, Z. K. & Chang, Y. A. Thermodynamic assessment of the Al–Fe–Si system. Metal. Mater. Trans. A 30, 1081–1085 (1999).10.1007/s11661-999-0160-3 ↗
35. Seema et al. Thermodynamic modeling of Al–Si nanoalloy phase diagram. J. Nanopart. Res. 23, 245 (2021).10.1007/s11051-021-05351-w ↗
36. Ikhmayies, S. Phase Diagrams of Al–Si System. In: Energy Technology 2019: Carbon dioxide management and other technologies. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series (eds Wang, T. et al.) 231–237; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06209-5_24 (Springer International Publishing, 2019).10.1007/978-3-030-06209-5_24 ↗
37. Li, Y. et al. Thermodynamic investigation on phase formation in the Al–Si rich region of Al–Si–Ti system. Mater. Design 102, 78–90 (2016).10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.144 ↗
38. Hentzell, H. T. G. et al. Formation of aluminum silicide between two layers of amorphous silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 933–934 (1987).10.1063/1.97984 ↗
39. Wang, Q., Zhao, K., Wei, S., Liu, H. & Zhang, S. Crystalline aluminum silicides with electride state and superconductivity under high pressure. Mater. Today Phys. 28, 100853 (2022).10.1016/j.mtphys.2022.100853 ↗
40. Gordeev, I., Kolotova, L. & Starikov, S. Formation of metastable aluminum silicide as intermediate stage of Al–Si alloy crystallization. Scripta Mater 210, 114481 (2022).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114481 ↗
41. Mabuchi, M. & Higashi, K. Strengthening mechanisms of Mg–Si alloys. Acta Mater 44, 4611–4618 (1996).10.1016/1359-6454(96)00072-9 ↗
42. Diqing, W., Jincheng, W., Gaifang, W. & Gencang, Y. High damping properties of Mg–Si binary hypoeutectic alloys. Mater. Lett. 63, 391–393 (2009).10.1016/j.matlet.2008.10.056 ↗
43. Mabuchi, M., Kubota, K. & Higashi, K. Tensile strength, ductility and fracture of magnesium–silicon alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 31, 1529–1535 (1996).10.1007/BF00357861 ↗
44. Yuan, X., Sun, W., Du, Y., Zhao, D. & Yang, H. Thermodynamic modeling of the Mg–Si system with the Kaptay equation for the excess Gibbs energy of the liquid phase. Calphad 33, 673–678 (2009).10.1016/j.calphad.2009.08.004 ↗
45. Lacaze, J. & Valdes, R. CALPHAD–type assessment of the Al–Mg–Si system. Monatsh. Chem. 136, 1899–1907 (2005).10.1007/s00706-005-0385-9 ↗
46. Chakraborti, N. & Lukas, H. L. Thermodynamic optimization of the Mg–Al–Si phase diagram. Calphad 16, 79–86 (1992).10.1016/0364-5916(92)90041-U ↗
47. Tang, Y., Du, Y., Zhang, L., Yuan, X. & Kaptay, G. Thermodynamic description of the Al–Mg–Si system using a new formulation for the temperature dependence of the excess Gibbs energy. Thermochim. Acta 527, 131–142 (2012).10.1016/j.tca.2011.10.017 ↗
48. Povoden–Karadeniz, E. et al. CALPHAD modeling of metastable phases in the Al–Mg–Si system. Calphad 43, 94–104 (2013).10.1016/j.calphad.2013.03.004 ↗
49. Chase Jr, M. W. JANAF thermochemical tables third edition. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 14, Supplement 1 (1985).
50. Hillert, M. & Staffansson, L. I. Regular–solution model for stoichiometric phases and ionic melts. Acta Chem. Scand. 24, 3618–3626 (1970).10.3891/acta.chem.scand.24-3618 ↗
51. Sundman, B. & Ågren, J. A regular solution model for phases with several components and sublattices, suitable for computer applications. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 42, 297–301 (1981).10.1016/0022-3697(81)90144-X ↗
52. Waring, E. Problems concerning Interpolations. By Edward Waring, M. D. F. R. S. and of the Institute of Bononia, Lucasian Professor of Mathematics in the University of Cambridge. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. 69, 59–67 (1779).10.1098/rstl.1779.0008 ↗
53. Lagrange, J. L. Leçons élémentaires sur les mathématiques données à l’École Normale en 1795. J. de l’École polytechnique / publié par le Conseil d’instruction de cet établissement 2, 173–278 (1812).
54. Taylor, J. R., Dinsdale, A. T., Hilleit, M. & Selleby, M. A Critical assessment of tnermodynamic and phase diagram data for the Al–O system. Calphad 16, 173–179 (1992).10.1016/0364-5916(92)90005-I ↗
55. Hallstedt, B. The Magnesium—Oxygen system. Calphad 17, 281–286 (1993).10.1016/0364-5916(93)90006-W ↗
56. Liang, S. M. & Schmid–Fetzer, R. Complete thermodynamic description of the Mg–Ca–O phase diagram including the Ca–O, Mg–O and CaO–MgO subsystems. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 38, 4768–4785 (2018).10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.06.015 ↗
57. Zhu, Q., Oganov, A. R. & Lyakhov, A. O. Novel stable compounds in the Mg–O system under high pressure. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 7696–7700 (2013).10.1039/c3cp50678a ↗
58. Hallstedt, B. Thermodynamic assessment of the Silicon—Oxygen system. Calphad 16, 53–61 (1992).10.1016/0364-5916(92)90038-Y ↗
59. Hallstedt, B. Thermodynamic assessment of the system MgO–Al2O3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 1497–1507 (1992).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb04216.x ↗
60. Mao, H., Selleby, M. & Sundman, B. A re–evaluation of the liquid phases in the CaO–Al2O3 and MgO–Al2O3 systems. Calphad 28, 307–312 (2004).10.1016/j.calphad.2004.09.001 ↗
61. Berjonneau, J., Prigent, P. & Poirier, J. The development of a thermodynamic model for Al2O3–MgO refractory castable corrosion by secondary metallurgy steel ladle slags. Ceram. Inter 35, 623–625 (2009).10.1016/j.ceramint.2008.04.002 ↗
62. Jung, I. H., Decterov, S. A. & Pelton, A. D. Critical thermodynamic evaluation and optimization of the MgO–Al2O3, CaO–MgO–Al2O3, and MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 systems. J. Phase Equ. Diff 25, 329–345 (2004).10.1007/s11669-004-0151-4 ↗
63. Ma, T., Liu, Y., Gao, F., Zhang, L. & Du, Y. Thermodynamic optimization and calculation of the Al2O3-MgO and Al2O3-MgO-SiO2 systems. Mater. Sci. Eng. Powder Met. 27, 360–371 (2022).
64. Henriksen, A. F. & Kingery, W. D. The solid solubility of Sc2O3, Al2O3, Cr2O3, SiO2 and ZrO2 in MgO. Ceramurgia Int 5, 11–17 (1979).10.1016/0390-5519(79)90003-6 ↗
65. Hillert, M. & Jonsson, S. Prediction of the Al–Si–O system. Calphad 16, 193–198 (1992).10.1016/0364-5916(92)90007-K ↗
66. Zhang, C., Zhang, F., Cao, W. S. & Chang, Y. A. Thermodynamic modeling of the Al–Si–Sr–O quaternary system. Intermetallics 18, 1419–1427 (2010).10.1016/j.intermet.2010.01.032 ↗
67. Mao, H., Selleby, M. & Sundman, B. Phase equilibria and thermodynamics in the Al2O3–SiO2 system—modeling of mullite and liquid. J. Am. Ceram. Soc 88, 2544–2551 (2005).10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00440.x ↗
68. Eriksson, G. & Pelton, A. Critical evaluation and optimization of the thermodynamic properties and phase diagrams of the CaO–Al2O3, Al2O3–SiO2, and CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 systems. Metal. Trans. B 24, 807–816 (1993).10.1007/BF02663141 ↗
69. Howald, R. A. & Eliezer, I. The thermodynamic properties of mullite. J. Phys. Chem. 82, 2199–2204 (1978).10.1021/j100509a010 ↗
70. Schneider, H. & Komarneni, S. Mullite (John Wiley & Sons, 2006).10.1002/3527607358 ↗
71. Whitney, D. L. Coexisting andalusite, kyanite, and sillimanite: Sequential formation of three Al2SiO5 polymorphs during progressive metamorphism near the triple point, Sivrihisar, Turkey. Am. Miner. 87, 405–416 (2002).10.2138/am-2002-0404 ↗
72. Hemingway, B. S., Robie, R. A., Evans, H. T. & Kerrick, D. M. Heat capacities and entropies of sillimanite, fibrolite, andalusite, kyanite, and quartz and the Al2SiO5 phase diagram. Am. Miner. 76, 1597–1613 (1991).
73. Holdaway, M. J. & Mukhopadhyay, B. A reevaluation of the stability relations of andalusite: thermochemical data and phase diagram for the aluminum silicates. Am. Miner. 78, 298–315 (1993).
74. Salje, E. Heat capacities and entropies of andalusite and sillimanite: the influence of fibrolitization on the phase diagram of the Al2SiO5 polymorphs. Am. Miner 71, 1366–1371 (1986).
75. Bradt, R. C. The sillimanite minerals: andalusite, kyanite, and sillimanite. In: Ceramic and Glass Materials: Structure, Properties and Processing (eds Shackelford, J. F. & Doremus, R. H.) 41–48; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73362-3 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2008).10.1007/978-0-387-73362-3 ↗
76. Holdaway, M. J. Stability of andalusite and the aluminum silicate phase diagram. Am. J. Sci. 271, 97–131 (1971).10.2475/ajs.271.2.97 ↗
77. Waldbaum, D. R. Thermodynamic properties of mullite, andalusite, kyanite and sillimanite. Am. Miner. 50, 186–195 (1965).
78. Anderson, P. A. M., Newton, R. C. & Kleppa, O. J. The enthalpy change of the andalusite–sillimanite reaction and the Al2SiO5 diagram. Am. J. Sci. 277, 585–593 (1977).10.2475/ajs.277.5.585 ↗
79. Hallstedt, B. Thermodynamic calculation of some subsystems of the Al–Ca–Mg–Si–O system. J. Phase Equ. 14, 662–675 (1993).10.1007/BF02667878 ↗
80. Hillert, M. & Wang, X. A study of the thermodynamic properties of MgO–SiO2 system. Calphad 13, 253–266 (1989).10.1016/0364-5916(89)90005-9 ↗
81. Huang, W., Hillert, M. & Wang, X. Thermodynamic assessment of the CaO–MgO–SiO2 system. Metal. Mater. Trans. A 26, 2293–2310 (1995).10.1007/BF02671244 ↗
82. Swamy, V., Saxena, S. K. & Sundman, B. An assessment of the one–bar liquidus phase relations in the MgO – SiO2 system. Calphad 18, 157–164 (1994).10.1016/0364-5916(94)90025-6 ↗
83. Howald, R. A. & Scanlon, M. J. Heats of fusion and phase equilibria in the MgO – SiO2 system. Calphad 13, 33–43 (1989).10.1016/0364-5916(89)90036-9 ↗
84. Dorogokupets, P. I., Dymshits, A. M., Sokolova, T. S., Danilov, B. S. & Litasov, K. D. The equations of state of forsterite, wadsleyite, ringwoodite, akimotoite, MgSiO3–perovskite, and postperovskite and phase diagram for the Mg2SiO4 system at pressures of up to 130 GPa. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 56, 172–189 (2015).10.1016/j.rgg.2015.01.011 ↗
85. Sawamoto, H. Phase diagram of MgSiO3 at pressures up to 24 GPa and temperatures up to 2200 °C: phase stability and properties of tetragonal garnet. In: High‐Pressure Research in Mineral Physics: A Volume in Honor of Syun‐iti Akimoto. (eds Manghnani, M. H. & Syono, Y.) Vol. 39 209–219; https://doi.org/10.1029/GM039p0209 (John Wiley & Sons, 1987).10.1029/GM039p0209 ↗
86. Choudhury, N. & Chaplot, S. L. Free energy and relative stability of the enstatite Mg2Si2O6 polymorphs. Solid State Comm 114, 127–132 (2000).10.1016/S0038-1098(00)00027-2 ↗
87. Lee, W. E. & Heuer, A. H. On the polymorphism of enstatite. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, 349–360 (1987).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb05007.x ↗
88. Mao, H., Fabrichnaya, O., Selleby, M. & Sundman, B. Thermodynamic assessment of the MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 system. J. Mater. Res 20, 975–986 (2005).10.1557/JMR.2005.0123 ↗
89. Fabrichnaya, O., Costa e Silva, A. & Aldinger, F. Assessment of thermodynamic functions in the MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 system. Z. Metal 95, 793–805 (2004).
90. Pankrats, L. B., Stuve, J. M. & Gokcen, N. A. Thermodynamic Data for Mineral Technology (Bureau of Mines, 1984).
91. Hubbard, K. J. & Schlom, D. G. Thermodynamic stability of binary oxides in contact with silicon. J. Mater. Res 11, 2757–2776 (1996).10.1557/JMR.1996.0350 ↗
92. Schmalzried, H. & Pelton, A. D. Zur geometrischen Darstellung von Phasengleichgewichten. Ber. Bunsen–Ges. Phys. Chem 77, 90–94 (1973).10.1002/bbpc.19730770207 ↗
93. Brown, P. L. & Ekberg, C. Hydrolysis of metal ions (John Wiley & Sons, 2016).10.1002/9783527656189 ↗
94. Wefers, K., & Misra, C. Oxides and hydroxides of aluminum. Vol. 19 (Alcoa Laboratories, 1987).
95. Perkins, D., Essene, E. J., Westrum, E. F. & Wall, V. J. New thermodynamic data for diaspore and their application to the system Al2O3–SiO2–H2O. Am. Miner 64, 1080–1090 (1979).
96. Kennedy, G. C. Phase relations in the system of Al2O3–H2O at high temperatures and pressures. Am. J. Sci. 257, 563–573 (1959).10.2475/ajs.257.8.563 ↗
97. Bratton, R. J. & Brindley, G. W. Structure‐Controlled Reactions in Kaolinite‐Diaspore‐Boehmite Clays. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 45, 513–516 (1962).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1962.tb11048.x ↗
98. Barnhisel, R. I. & Rich, C. I. Gibbsite, bayerite, and nordstrandite formation as affected by anions, pH, and mineral surfaces. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 29, 531–534 (1965).10.2136/sssaj1965.03615995002900050018x ↗
99. Chesworth, W. The stability of gibbsite and boehmite at the surface of the earth. Clays Clay Miner 20, 369–374 (1972).10.1346/CCMN.1972.0200604 ↗
100. Jiang, Y. F., Liu, C. L., Xue, J., Li, P. & Yu, J. G. Insights into the polymorphic transformation mechanism of aluminum hydroxide during carbonation of potassium aluminate solution. CrystEngComm 20, 1431–1442 (2018).10.1039/C7CE01656E ↗