Interpretable material descriptors for critical pitting temperature in austenitic stainless steel via machine learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Austenitic stainless steel is renowned for its exceptional corrosion and mechanical properties, yet it remains susceptible to localized corrosion, such as pitting in the presence of aggressive ions or/and extreme environmental conditions. Critical pitting temperature (CPT) serves as a key metric for evaluating the susceptibility to pitting corrosion, and its accurate prediction is essential for engineering pitting-resistant alloys. In this work, through optimized feature selection processes, three critical features − standard reduction potential ( $${E}\max $$ ), valence electron ( $${{VEC}}_{{sum}}$$ ), and geometric parameters ( $$\lambda$$ ) − are identified as crucial descriptors for CPT. Utilizing interpretable machine learning techniques, a predictive model for CPT is developed and confirmed via cross-validation, demonstrating superior predictive accuracy. This work not only deepens our understanding of the underlying factors affecting pitting but also facilitates the development of austenitic stainless steel with improved resistance to pitting corrosion.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Li, W. et al. Promotion of pitting corrosion at hydrogen-enriched α/γ phase boundaries in austenitic stainless steel weld joints. Acta Mater. 227, 117728 (2022).10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117728 ↗
2. Kadoi, K., Kogure, M. & Inoue, H. Effect of ferrite morphology on pitting corrosion resistance of austenitic stainless steel weld metals. Corros. Sci. 221, 111356 (2023).10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111356 ↗
3. Yang, S. & Macdonald, D. D. Theoretical and experimental studies of the pitting of type 316 L stainless steel in borate buffer solution containing nitrate ion. Electrochim. Acta 52, 1871–1879 (2007).10.1016/j.electacta.2006.07.052 ↗
4. Macdonald, D. D. The Point Defect Model for the Passive State. J. Electrochem. Soc. 139, 3434 (1992).10.1149/1.2069096 ↗
5. Lei, Y. B. et al. Enhanced mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of 316 L stainless steel by pre-forming a gradient nanostructured surface layer and annealing. Acta Mater. 208, 116773 (2021).10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116773 ↗
6. Roychowdhury, S. et al. Understanding the effect of nitrogen in austenitic stainless steel on the intergranular stress corrosion crack growth rate in high temperature pure water. Acta Mater. 60, 610–621 (2012).10.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.053 ↗
7. Zheng, S. J. et al. Identification of MnCr2O4 nano-octahedron in catalysing pitting corrosion of austenitic stainless steels. Acta Mater. 58, 5070–5085 (2010).10.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.043 ↗
8. Jargelius-Pettersson, R. F. A. Application of the Pitting Resistance Equivalent Concept to Some Highly Alloyed Austenitic Stainless Steels. Corrosion 54, 162–168 (1998).10.5006/1.3284840 ↗
9. Abd El Meguid, E. A. & Abd El Latif, A. A. Critical pitting temperature for Type 254 SMO stainless steel in chloride solutions. Corros. Sci. 49, 263–275 (2007).10.1016/j.corsci.2006.06.011 ↗
10. Li, T., Scully, J. R. & Frankel, G. S. Localized Corrosion: Passive Film Breakdown vs Pit Growth Stability: Part II. A Model for Critical Pitting Temperature. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, C484–C491 (2018).10.1149/2.0591809jes ↗
11. Xie, J. & Su, Y. Machine Learning for Materials Research and Development. Acta Met. Sin. 57, 1343–1361 (2021).
12. Lookman, T., Balachandran, P. V., Xue, D. & Yuan, R. Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design. Npj Comput. Mater. 5, 1–17 (2019).10.1038/s41524-019-0153-8 ↗
13. Coelho, L. B. et al. Probing the randomness of the local current distributions of 316 L stainless steel corrosion in NaCl solution. Corros. Sci. 217, 111104 (2023).10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111104 ↗
14. Kamrunnahar, M. & Urquidi-Macdonald, M. Prediction of corrosion behavior using neural network as a data mining tool. Corros. Sci. 52, 669–677 (2010).10.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.024 ↗
15. Diao, Y., Yan, L. & Gao, K. Improvement of the machine learning-based corrosion rate prediction model through the optimization of input features. Mater. Des. 198, 109326 (2021).10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109326 ↗
16. Zhi, Y. et al. Improving atmospheric corrosion prediction through key environmental factor identification by random forest-based model. Corros. Sci. 178, 109084 (2021).10.1016/j.corsci.2020.109084 ↗
17. Song, Y. et al. Interpretability study on prediction models for alloy pitting based on ensemble learning. Corros. Sci. 228, 111790 (2024).10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111790 ↗
18. Roy, A. et al. Machine-learning-guided descriptor selection for predicting corrosion resistance in multi-principal element alloys. Npj Mater. Degrad. 6, 1–10 (2022).10.1038/s41529-021-00208-y ↗
19. Qiao, C. et al. Machine learning-based prediction of pitting corrosion resistance in stainless steels exposed to chloride environments. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 676, 132274 (2023).10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.132274 ↗
20. Coelho, L. B. et al. Estimating pitting descriptors of 316 L stainless steel by machine learning and statistical analysis. Npj Mater. Degrad. 7, 1–15 (2023).10.1038/s41529-023-00403-z ↗
21. Wu, S., Lambard, G., Liu, C., Yamada, H. & Yoshida, R. iQSPR in xenonpy: a bayesian molecular design algorithm. Mol. Inform. 39, 1900107 (2020).10.1002/minf.201900107 ↗
22. Zhao, Y. et al. Effects of Surface Roughness on Interface Bonding Performance for 316H Stainless Steel in Hot-Compression Bonding. Acta Metall. Sin. Engl. Lett. 36, 771–788 (2023).10.1007/s40195-023-01533-8 ↗
23. Tokuda, S., Muto, I., Sugawara, Y. & Hara, N. High-Temperature Heat-Treatment at 1673 K: Improvement of Pitting Corrosion Resistance at Inclusions of Type 304 Stainless Steel under Applied Stress. Mater. Trans. 63, 265–268 (2022).10.2320/matertrans.MT-M2021232 ↗
24. Kong, D. et al. Heat treatment effect on the microstructure and corrosion behavior of 316 L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 276, 293–303 (2018).10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.188 ↗
25. Ebrahimi, N., Momeni, M., Moayed, M. H. & Davoodi, A. Correlation between critical pitting temperature and degree of sensitisation on alloy 2205 duplex stainless steel. Corros. Sci. 53, 637–644 (2011).10.1016/j.corsci.2010.10.009 ↗
26. Chou, Y. L., Yeh, J. W. & Shih, H. C. Effect of Inhibitors on the Critical Pitting Temperature of the High-Entropy Alloy Co1.5CrFeNi1.5Ti0.5Mo0.1. J. Electrochem. Soc. 158, C246 (2011).10.1149/1.3600348 ↗
27. Mori, G. & Bauernfeind, D. Pitting and crevice corrosion of superaustenitic stainless steels. Mater. Corros. 55, 164–173 (2004).10.1002/maco.200303746 ↗
28. Liu, J. Research on Critical Pitting Temperature of 316 L Stainless Steel. (Harbin Engineering University, 2015).
29. Chang, Q. Effect of Deep Ocean on Critical Pitting Temperature of 316 L Stainless Steel. (Harbin Engineering University, 2016).
30. Sridhar, N., Anderko, A. & Kung, S. Review—Effects of Solution and Alloy Composition on Critical Crevice Temperature. J. Electrochem. Soc. 170, 031502 (2023).10.1149/1945-7111/acc13d ↗
31. Salinas-Bravo, V. M. & Newman, R. C. An alternative method to determine critical pitting temperature of stainless steels in ferric chloride solution. Corros. Sci. 36, 67–77 (1994).10.1016/0010-938X(94)90109-0 ↗
32. Weng, B. et al. Simple descriptor derived from symbolic regression accelerating the discovery of new perovskite catalysts. Nat. Commun. 11, 3513 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-17263-9 ↗
33. Wang, Y., Wagner, N. & Rondinelli, J. M. Symbolic regression in materials science. MRS Commun. 9, 793–805 (2019).10.1557/mrc.2019.85 ↗
34. Yashiro, H., Hirayasu, D. & Kumagai, N. Effect of Nitrogen Alloying on the Pitting of Type 310 Stainless Steel. ISIJ Int 42, 1477–1482 (2002).10.2355/isijinternational.42.1477 ↗
35. Boucherit, M. N., Amzert, S. A. & Arbaoui, F. Application of machine learning in predicting pitting corrosion–electrochemical data around the open circuit potential. Anti-Corros. Methods Mater. 69, 295–301 (2022).10.1108/ACMM-07-2021-2516 ↗
36. Compère, C., Jaffré, P. & Festy, D. Aging of type 316 L stainless steel in seawater: Relationship between open-circuit potential, exposure time, and pitting potential. Corrosion 52, 496–501 (1996).10.5006/1.3292139 ↗
37. Nyby, C. et al. Electrochemical metrics for corrosion resistant alloys. Sci. Data 8, 58 (2021).10.1038/s41597-021-00840-y ↗
38. Wang, Y., Si, J., Si, Y. & Shi, Z. Preparation and electrochemical corrosion performances of Zr-Ti-Ni-Cu-Be high-entropy bulk metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 289, 116267 (2023).10.1016/j.mseb.2023.116267 ↗
39. Valor, A., Caleyo, F., Alfonso, L., Rivas, D. & Hallen, J. M. Stochastic modeling of pitting corrosion: A new model for initiation and growth of multiple corrosion pits. Corros. Sci. 49, 559–579 (2007).10.1016/j.corsci.2006.05.049 ↗
40. Punckt, C. et al. Sudden Onset of Pitting Corrosion on Stainless Steel as a Critical Phenomenon. Science 305, 1133–1136 (2004).10.1126/science.1101358 ↗
41. Sun, Y. T., Wang, J. M., Jiang, Y. M. & Li, J. A comparative study on potentiodynamic and potentiostatic critical pitting temperature of austenitic stainless steels. Mater. Corros. 69, 44–52 (2018).10.1002/maco.201709641 ↗
42. Zhu, D. et al. A transfer learning strategy for tensile strength prediction in austenitic stainless steel across temperatures. Scr. Mater. 251, 116210 (2024).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.116210 ↗
43. Nakhaie, D., Zakeri, M., Naghizadeh, M., Clifford, A. M. & Asselin, E. Statistical Distribution of Critical Pitting Temperature of Stainless Steels. J. Electrochem. Soc. 170, 061504 (2023).10.1149/1945-7111/acdcbe ↗
44. Ovarfort, R. Critical pitting temperature measurements of stainless steels with an improved electrochemical method. Corros. Sci. 29, 987–993 (1989).10.1016/0010-938X(89)90088-7 ↗
45. Alfonsson, E. & Qvarfort, R. Investigation of the Applicability of some Pre Expressions for Austenitic Stainless Steels. Mater. Sci. Forum 111–112, 483–492 (1992).10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.111-112.483 ↗
46. Moayed, M. H., Laycock, N. J. & Newman, R. C. Dependence of the Critical Pitting Temperature on surface roughness. Corros. Sci. 45, 1203–1216 (2003).10.1016/S0010-938X(02)00215-9 ↗
47. Nakhaie, D., Imani, A., Autret, M., Schaller, R. F. & Asselin, E. Critical pitting temperature of selective laser melted 316 L stainless steel: A mechanistic approach. Corros. Sci. 185, 109302 (2021).10.1016/j.corsci.2021.109302 ↗
48. Pour-Ali, S., Tavangar, R. & Hejazi, S. Influence of ultrafine surface grain size on the passive film chemistry and critical pitting temperature (CPT) in AISI 316 L austenitic stainless steel. Can. Metall. Q. 63, 1367–1379 (2024).10.1080/00084433.2023.2294558 ↗
49. Naghizadeh, M., Nakhaie, D., Zakeri, M. & Moayed, M. H. Effect of Thiosulfate on Pitting Corrosion of 316SS: I. Critical Pitting Temperature and Pit Chemistry. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, C71 (2014).10.1149/2.0861501jes ↗
50. Barbosa, B. A. R. S., Tavares, S. S. M., Cobuci, A. & de Macêdo, M. C. S. Influence of Microstructure on Pitting Corrosion Resistance of Alloy 904 L Superaustenitic Stainless Steel. Corrosion 68, 739–746 (2012).10.5006/0534 ↗
51. Liu, J. et al. Prediction of Critical Pitting Temperature of 316 L Stainless Steel in Gas Field Environments by Artificial Neutral Network. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. 36, 205–211 (2016).
52. Liu, J., Zhang, T., Meng, G., Shao, Y. & Wang, F. Effect of pitting nucleation on critical pitting temperature of 316 L stainless steel by nitric acid passivation. Corros. Sci. 91, 232–244 (2015).10.1016/j.corsci.2014.11.018 ↗
53. Total Materia - The world’s most comprehensive materials database. https://www.totalmateria.com/ (2024).
54. Tan, X. et al. Roles of different components of complex inclusion in pitting of 321 stainless steel: Induction effect of CaS and inhibition effect of TiN. Corros. Sci. 209, 110692 (2022).10.1016/j.corsci.2022.110692 ↗
55. Liu, C. et al. Towards a better understanding of localised corrosion induced by typical non-metallic inclusions in low-alloy steels. Corros. Sci. 179, 109150 (2021).10.1016/j.corsci.2020.109150 ↗
56. Zheng, J. H., Bogaerts, W. F. & Phlippo, K. Effects of dissolved oxygen and hydrogen peroxide on the corrosion potential of 316 L stainless steel in hot lithium hydroxide solution. Fusion Eng. Des. 24, 299–307 (1994).10.1016/0920-3796(94)90028-0 ↗
57. Zeng, H., Yang, Y., Zeng, M. & Li, M. Effect of dissolved oxygen on electrochemical corrosion behavior of 2205 duplex stainless steel in hot concentrated seawater. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 66, 177–185 (2021).10.1016/j.jmst.2020.06.030 ↗
58. The periodic table of the elements by WebElements. https://www.webelements.com/ (2024).
59. Bard, A. Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution. (Routledge, 2017).10.1201/9780203738764 ↗
60. Guo, S. Phase selection rules for cast high entropy alloys: an overview. Mater. Sci. Technol. 31, 1223–1230 (2015).10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000018 ↗
61. Zhu, D. et al. Identifying intrinsic factors for ductile-to-brittle transition temperatures in Fe–Al intermetallics via machine learning. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 26, 8836–8845 (2023).10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.135 ↗
62. Wolpert, D. H. & Macready, W. G. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 1, 67–82 (1997).10.1109/4235.585893 ↗
63. Lundberg, S. & Lee, S. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07874 (2017). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874.10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874 ↗
64. Li, Z. Extracting spatial effects from machine learning model using local interpretation method: An example of SHAP and XGBoost. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 96, 101845 (2022).10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2022.101845 ↗
65. Shang, C. et al. A quantitative relation for the ductile-brittle transition temperature in pipeline steel. Scr. Mater. 244, 116023 (2024).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.116023 ↗