Molecular dynamics study of grain boundaries as defect sinks under irradiation in LiAlO2 and LiAl5O8
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Lithium aluminate ceramics, LiAlO2 and LiAl5O8, show promise in nuclear environments due to their excellent radiation tolerance. Molecular dynamics simulations investigate grain boundaries (GB) and their role in defect evolution. Results reveal that GBs act as efficient defect sinks, with Li and Al atoms exhibiting distinct behaviors during displacement cascades. Tritium migration in LiAlO2 is also studied, showing rapid diffusion and stable configurations with oxygen, corroborated by ab initio simulations from the literature. The calculated tritium diffusion coefficient of 1.33 × 10−¹⁴ m²/s aligns with the literature, validating the model. LiAl5O8 demonstrates superior defect healing compared to LiAlO2, attributed to enhanced atomic transfer between grains and GBs. These findings reveal key insights into defect dynamics, providing essential insights for their application in tritium-producing burnable absorber rods (TPBARs).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Fusion materials and technologies · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Senor, D. J. Recommendations for Tritium Science and Technology Research and Development in Support of the Tritium Readiness Campaign. TTP-7-084. (Pacific Northwest National Lab (PNNL), 2013).10.2172/1113608 ↗
2. Devaraj, A. et al. Comprehensive analysis of hydrogen, deuterium, tritium and isotopic ratios of other light elements in neutron irradiated TPBAR components. Microsc. Microanal. 25, 280–281 (2019).10.1017/S1431927619002137 ↗
3. Roy, A., Casella, A. M., Senor, D. J., Jiang, W. & Devanathan, R. Molecular dynamics simulations of displacement cascades in LiAlO2 and LiAl5O8 ceramics. Sci. Rep. 14, 1897 (2024).10.1038/s41598-024-51222-4 ↗
4. Nakaya, H. et al. Core configuration of a gas-cooled reactor as a tritium production device for fusion reactor. Nucl. Eng. Des. 271, 505–509 (2014).10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.12.023 ↗
5. Jia, T., Senor, D. J. & Duan, Y. Tritium species diffusion on and desorption from γ-LiAlO2 (100) surface: A first-principles investigation. J. Nucl. Mater. 540, 152394 (2020).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152394 ↗
6. Roy, A., Senor, D. J., Casella, A. M. & Devanathan, R. Molecular dynamics simulations of radiation response of LiAlO2 and LiAl5O8. J. Nucl. Mater. 576, 154280 (2023).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154280 ↗
7. Voskoboinikov, R. Radiation defects in aluminum. Simulation of primary damage in surface collision cascades. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 120, 9–15 (2019).10.1134/S0031918X1901006X ↗
8. Voskoboinikov, R. Simulation of primary radiation damage in nickel. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 121, 14–20 (2020).10.1134/S0031918X20010196 ↗
9. Samolyuk, G. D., Osetsky, Y. & Stoller, R. E. Molecular dynamics modeling of atomic displacement cascades in 3C–SiC: Comparison of interatomic potentials. J. Nucl. Mater. 465, 83–88 (2015).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.05.036 ↗
10. Granberg, F. et al. Mechanism of radiation damage reduction in equiatomic multicomponent single phase alloys. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 135504 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.135504 ↗
11. Nordlund, K. et al. Improving atomic displacement and replacement calculations with physically realistic damage models. Nat. Commun. 9, 1084 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-03415-5 ↗
12. Roy, A., Senor, D. J., Edwards, D. J., Casella, A. M. & Devanathan, R. Insights into radiation resistance of titanium alloys from displacement cascade simulations. J. Nucl. Mater. 586, 154695 (2023).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154695 ↗
13. Jäger, W. & Wilkens, M. Formation of vacancy‐type dislocation loops in tungsten bombarded by 60 keV Au ions. Phys. Stat. Sol. 32, 89–100 (1975).10.1002/pssa.2210320109 ↗
14. Liu, L. et al. Molecular dynamic simulations of displacement cascades in tungsten and tungsten–rhenium alloys: effects of grain boundary and/or σ phase. J. Nucl. Mater. 561, 153543 (2022).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.153543 ↗
15. Bai, X.-M., Voter, A. F., Hoagland, R. G., Nastasi, M. & Uberuaga, B. P. Efficient annealing of radiation damage near grain boundaries via interstitial emission. Science 327, 1631–1634 (2010).10.1126/science.1183723 ↗
16. Tschopp, M. A., Horstemeyer, M., Gao, F., Sun, X. & Khaleel, M. Energetic driving force for preferential binding of self-interstitial atoms to Fe grain boundaries over vacancies. Scr. Mater. 64, 908–911 (2011).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.031 ↗
17. Sugio, K., Shimomura, Y. & de la Rubia, T. D. Computer simulation of displacement damage cascade formation near sigma 5 twist boundary in silver. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 67, 882–889 (1998).10.1143/JPSJ.67.882 ↗
18. Samaras, M., Derlet, P., Van Swygenhoven, H. & Victoria, M. Computer simulation of displacement cascades in nanocrystalline Ni. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 125505 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.125505 ↗
19. Samaras, M., Derlet, P., Van Swygenhoven, H. & Victoria, M. Radiation damage near grain boundaries. Philos. Mag. 83, 3599–3607 (2003).10.1080/14786430310001600222 ↗
20. Samaras, M., Derlet, P., Van Swygenhoven, H. & Victoria, M. Stacking fault tetrahedra formation in the neighbourhood of grain boundaries. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 202, 51–55 (2003).10.1016/S0168-583X(02)01829-3 ↗
21. Samaras, M., Derlet, P., Swygenhoven, H. Van & Victoria, M. Atomic scale modelling of the primary damage state of irradiated fcc and bcc nanocrystalline metals. J. Nucl. Mater. 351, 47–55 (2006).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.030 ↗
22. Demkowicz, M. J., Anderoglu, O., Zhang, X. & Misra, A. The influence of∑ 3 twin boundaries on the formation of radiation-induced defect clusters in nanotwinned Cu. J. Mater. Res. 26, 1666–1675 (2011).10.1557/jmr.2011.56 ↗
23. Zhang, Y. et al. Irradiation-induced large bubble formation and grain growth in super nano-grained ceramic. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 41, 7868–7877 (2021).10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.08.051 ↗
24. Zhang, Y. et al. Grain growth and phase stability of nanocrystalline cubic zirconia under ion irradiation. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 82, 184105 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.82.184105 ↗
25. Dey, S. et al. Radiation tolerance of nanocrystalline ceramics: insights from yttria stabilized zirconia. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–9 (2015).10.1038/srep07746 ↗
26. Carrez, P. et al. Low‐temperature crystallization of MgSiO3 glasses under electron irradiation: Possible implications for silicate dust evolution in circumstellar environments,. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 37, 1615–1622 (2002).10.1111/j.1945-5100.2002.tb00815.x ↗
27. Van Brutzel, L. & Vincent-Aublant, E. Grain boundary influence on displacement cascades in UO2: a molecular dynamics study. J. Nucl. Mater. 377, 522–527 (2008).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.04.010 ↗
28. Van Brutzel, L., Vincent-Aublant, E. & Delaye, J.-M. Large molecular dynamics simulations of collision cascades in single-crystal, bi-crystal, and poly-crystal UO2. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 267, 3013–3016 (2009).10.1016/j.nimb.2009.06.078 ↗
29. Tian, X., Gao, T., Xiao, H. & Lu, C. Dynamical simulations of displacement cascades near symmetrical tilt grain boundaries in UO. Ind. J. Phys. 88, 137–143 (2014).10.1007/s12648-013-0400-7 ↗
30. Bai, X.-M. & Uberuaga, B. P. Multi-timescale investigation of radiation damage near TiO2 rutile grain boundaries. Philos. Mag. 92, 1469–1498 (2012).10.1080/14786435.2011.648229 ↗
31. Setyawan, W., Senor, D. J. & Devanathan, R. Insights on amorphization of lithium aluminate from atomistic simulation. J. Phys. Chem. C. 121, 7635–7642 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12562 ↗
32. Setyawan, W., Senor, D. J. & Devanathan, R. Role of interfaces in damage process of irradiated lithium aluminate nanocrystals. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 102, 1982–1993 (2019).10.1111/jace.16051 ↗
33. Liu, L. et al. Atomistic simulations of the interaction between transmutation-produced Re and grain boundaries in tungsten. Comput. Mater. Sci. 173, 109412 (2020).10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109412 ↗
34. Liu, J., Byggmästar, J., Fan, Z., Qian, P. & Su, Y. Large-scale machine-learning molecular dynamics simulation of primary radiation damage in tungsten. Phys. Rev. B 108, 054312 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevB.108.054312 ↗
35. Pérez-Pérez, F. J. & Smith, R. Structural changes at grain boundaries in bcc iron induced by atomic collisions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 164, 487–494 (2000).10.1016/S0168-583X(99)01141-6 ↗
36. Pérez-Pérez, F. J. & Smith, R. Preferential damage at symmetrical tilt grain boundaries in bcc iron. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 180, 322–328 (2001).10.1016/S0168-583X(01)00439-6 ↗
37. Narayanan, B., Van Duin, A. C., Kappes, B. B., Reimanis, I. E. & Ciobanu, C. V. A reactive force field for lithium–aluminum silicates with applications to eucryptite phases. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 20, 015002 (2011).10.1088/0965-0393/20/1/015002 ↗
38. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
39. Islam, M. M. & Bredow, T. Interstitial lithium diffusion pathways in γ-LiAlO2: a computational study. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4622–4626 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01780 ↗
40. Marezio, M. The crystal structure and anomalous dispersion of γ-LiAlO2. Acta Crystallogr. 19, 396–400 (1965).10.1107/S0365110X65003511 ↗
41. Jiang, W. et al. Microstructural evolution and precipitation in γ-LiAlO2 during ion irradiation. J. Appl. Phys. 131, 215902 (2022).10.1063/5.0089865 ↗
42. Olmsted, D. L., Foiles, S. M. & Holm, E. A. Survey of computed grain boundary properties in face-centered cubic metals: I. Grain boundary energy. Acta Mater. 57, 3694–3703 (2009).10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.007 ↗
43. Olmsted, D. L., Holm, E. A. & Foiles, S. M. Survey of computed grain boundary properties in face-centered cubic metals—II: grain boundary mobility,. Acta Mater. 57, 3704–3713 (2009).10.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.015 ↗
44. Wolf, D. A broken‐bond model for grain boundaries in face‐centered cubic metals. J. Appl. Phys. 68, 3221–3236 (1990).10.1063/1.346373 ↗
45. Zheng, H. et al. Grain boundary properties of elemental metals. Acta Mater. 186, 40–49 (2020).10.1016/j.actamat.2019.12.030 ↗
46. Federici, G. et al. Plasma-material interactions in current tokamaks and their implications for next step fusion reactors. Nucl. Fusion 41, 1967 (2001).10.1088/0029-5515/41/12/218 ↗
47. Neu, R. et al. Final steps to an all tungsten divertor tokamak. J. Nucl. Mater. 363, 52–59 (2007).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.021 ↗
48. Jiang, W. et al. Microstructural and compositional evolutions in γ-LiAlO2 pellets during ion irradiation at an elevated temperature. J. Nucl. Mater. 591, 154925 (2024).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.154925 ↗
49. Wiedemann, D. et al. Unravelling ultraslow lithium-ion diffusion in γ-LiAlO2: experiments with tracers, neutrons, and charge carriers. Chem. Mater. 28, 915–924 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04608 ↗
50. Mo, S., Zhang, B., Zhang, K., Li, S. & Pan, F. LiAl 5 O 8 as a potential coating material in lithium-ion batteries: a first principles study. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 13758–13765 (2019).10.1039/C9CP02650A ↗
51. Andersson, D. et al. Atomistic modeling of intrinsic and radiation-enhanced fission gas (Xe) diffusion in UO2±x: implications for nuclear fuel performance modeling. J. Nucl. Mater. 451, 225–242 (2014).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.03.041 ↗
52. Liu, X.-Y., Uberuaga, B. P., Andersson, D., Stanek, C. R. & Sickafus, K. Mechanism for transient migration of xenon in UO2. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 151902 (2011).10.1063/1.3579198 ↗
53. Liu, X.-Y. & Andersson, D. Molecular dynamics study of fission gas bubble nucleation in UO2. J. Nucl. Mater. 462, 8–14 (2015).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.03.030 ↗
54. Sassi, M., Spurgeon, S. R., Matthews, B. E., Devaraj, A. & Senor, D. J. First-principles study of tritium trapping in γ-LiAlO2 nanovoids. J. Phys. Chem. C. 126, 5767–5776 (2022).10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c00381 ↗
55. Roy, A. et al. Cluster dynamics simulations of tritium and helium diffusion in lithium ceramics. J. Nucl. Mater. 592, 154970 (2024).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.154970 ↗
56. Roy, A., Kalsar, R., Song, M. & Joshi, V. V. Atomistic simulations to reveal HIP-bonding mechanisms of Al6061/Al6061. Acta Mater. 281, 120402 (2024).10.1016/j.actamat.2024.120402 ↗
57. Jacobs, J.-P., San Miguel, M. A., Alvarez, L. J. & Giral, P. B. Lithium diffusion in γ-LiAlO2, a molecular dynamics simulation. J. Nucl. Mater. 232, 131–137 (1996).10.1016/S0022-3115(96)00435-7 ↗
58. Tsuchihira, H., Oda, T. & Tanaka, S. Derivation of potential model for LiAlO2 by simple and effective optimization of model parameters. J. Nucl. Mater. 395, 112–119 (2009).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.10.041 ↗
59. Kuganathan, N., Dark, J., Sgourou, E., Panayiotatos, Y. & Chroneos, A. Atomistic simulations of the defect chemistry and self-diffusion of Li-ion in LiAlO2. Energies 12, 2895 (2019).10.3390/en12152895 ↗
60. Ziegler, J. F. & Biersack, J. P. in Treatise on Heavy-Ion Science (ed. Bromley, D. A.) (Springer, 1985).
61. Van Duin, A. C., Dasgupta, S., Lorant, F. & Goddard, W. A. ReaxFF: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 9396–9409 (2001).10.1021/jp004368u ↗
62. Hirel, P. Atomsk: a tool for manipulating and converting atomic data files. Comput. Phys. Commun. 197, 212–219 (2015).10.1016/j.cpc.2015.07.012 ↗
63. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗