Super-resolved microstructure of pyrolyzing superlight ablators
Source abstract
Abstract
The microstructural evolution of superlight ablators during pyrolysis was investigated using in situ X-ray micro-computed tomography and generative adversarial networks. Superlight ablators, a type of syntactic foam thermal protection materials, are commonly employed in the backshells of planetary entry probes. Synchrotron X-rays were used to resolve the material constituents during thermal degradation, including resin, silica microballoons, cork filler, refractory fibers, and voids. A super-resolution methodology was implemented, where high-resolution tomography scans were applied to denoise, segment and analyze lower-resolution in situ datasets that captured a large field of view. This multi-scale approach enabled the quantification of morphological and effective properties as a function of temperature during degradation, while also relating these changes to relevant decomposition chemistry. This study demonstrates a strategy for time-resolving rapid, multiphase decomposition events occurring under high-temperature test environments that mimic atmospheric entry.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory · Combustion and flame dynamics · Radiative Heat Transfer Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Venkatapathy, E. et al. Entry system technology readiness for ice-giant probe missions. Space Sci. Rev. 216, 1–21 (2020).10.1007/s11214-020-0638-2 ↗
2. Beck, R. A. S. et al. Development of the Mars Science Laboratory heatshield thermal protection system. J. Spacecr. Rockets 51, 1139–1150 (2014).10.2514/1.A32635 ↗
3. Mansour, N. N., Panerai, F., Lachaud, J. & Magin, T. Flow mechanics in ablative thermal protection systems. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 56, 549–575 (2024).10.1146/annurev-fluid-030322-010557 ↗
4. Strauss, E. L. Superlight ablative systems for Mars lander thermal protection. J. Spacecr. Rockets 4, 1304–1309 (1967).10.2514/3.29076 ↗
5. Strauss, E. L. Development and characterization of a radio frequency-transparent ablator. J. Macromol. Sci. Chem. 3, 735–761 (1969).10.1080/10601326908053838 ↗
6. Yassin, A. H. & Poovathingal, S. J. Characterization of directional and anisotropic scattering dependency of emissivity for fibrous heat shields under non-isothermal conditions. Int. J. Heat. Mass Transf. 220, 124859 (2024).10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124859 ↗
7. Ferguson, J. C. et al. Modeling the oxidation of low-density carbon fiber material based on micro-tomography. Carbon 96, 57–65 (2016).10.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.113 ↗
8. Panerai, F. et al. Micro-tomography based analysis of thermal conductivity, diffusivity and oxidation behavior of rigid and flexible fibrous insulators. Int. J. Heat. Mass Transf. 108, 801–811 (2017).10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.12.048 ↗
9. Vanaerschot, A. et al. Stochastic characterisation methodology for 3-d textiles based on micro-tomography. Compos. Struct. 173, 44–52 (2017).10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.03.107 ↗
10. Borner, A., Panerai, F. & Mansour, N. N. High temperature permeability of fibrous materials using direct simulation Monte Carlo. Int. J. Heat. Mass Transf. 106, 1318–1326 (2017).10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.10.113 ↗
11. Ferguson, J. C., Panerai, F., Borner, A. & Mansour, N. N. PuMA: the porous microstructure analysis software. SoftwareX 7, 81–87 (2018).10.1016/j.softx.2018.03.001 ↗
12. Semeraro, F., Ferguson, J. C., Panerai, F., King, R. J. & Mansour, N. N. Anisotropic analysis of fibrous and woven materials part 1: Estimation of local orientation. Comput. Mater. Sci. 178, 109631 (2020).10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109631 ↗
13. Semeraro, F., Ferguson, J. C., Acin, M., Panerai, F. & Mansour, N. N. Anisotropic analysis of fibrous and woven materials part 2: Computation of effective conductivity. Comput. Mater. Sci. 186, 109956 (2021).10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109956 ↗
14. Ferguson, J. C. et al. Update 3.0 to “PuMA: the porous microstructure analysis software”,(pii: S2352711018300281). SoftwareX 15, 100775 (2021).10.1016/j.softx.2021.100775 ↗
15. Ferguson, J. C., Borner, A., Panerai, F., Close, S. & Mansour, N. N. Continuum to rarefied diffusive tortuosity factors in porous media from x-ray microtomography. Comput. Mater. Sci. 203, 111030 (2022).10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.111030 ↗
16. Foster, C. W., Collins, L. N., Panerai, F. & Roberts, S. A. Assessing thermophysical properties of parameterized woven composite models using image-based simulations. Compos. Sci. Technol. 241, 110136 (2023).10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110136 ↗
17. Foster, C. W., Oruganti, S. & Panerai, F. Real-time quantitative imaging of rtv silicone pyrolysis. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 214, 110403 (2023).10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2023.110403 ↗
18. Roberts, S. A., Brunini, V. E., Long, K. N. & Grillet, A. M. A framework for three-dimensional mesoscale modeling of anisotropic swelling and mechanical deformation in lithium-ion electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, F3052–F3059 (2014).10.1149/2.0081411jes ↗
19. Roberts, S. A. O., Mendoza, H., Brunini, V. E. & Noble, D. R. A verified conformal decomposition finite element method for implicit, many-material geometries. J. Comput. Phys. 375, 352–367 (2018).10.1016/j.jcp.2018.08.022 ↗
20. Trembacki, B. L. et al. Editors’ choice-mesoscale analysis of conductive binder domain morphology in lithium-ion battery electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, E725–E736 (2018).10.1149/2.0981813jes ↗
21. Lang, J. T. et al. X-ray tomography applied to electrochemical devices and electrocatalysis. Chem. Rev. 123, 9880–9914 (2023).10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00873 ↗
22. Boigné, E., Bennett, N. R., Wang, A., Mohri, K. & Ihme, M. Simultaneous in-situ measurements of gas temperature and pyrolysis of biomass smoldering via x-ray computed tomography. Proc. Combust. Inst. 38, 3899–3907 (2021).10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.070 ↗
23. Boigné, E., Bennett, N. R., Wang, A. & Ihme, M. Quantitative x-ray computed tomography: prospects for detailed in-situ imaging in bench-scale fire measurements. Fire Saf. J. 126, 103476 (2021).10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103476 ↗
24. Boigné, E., Bennett, N. R., Wang, A. & Ihme, M. Structural analysis of biomass pyrolysis and oxidation using in-situ x-ray computed tomography. Combust. Flame 235, 111737 (2022).10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111737 ↗
25. Bale, H. A. et al. Real-time quantitative imaging of failure events in materials under load at temperatures above 1600 °C. Nat. Mater. 12, 40–46 (2013).10.1038/nmat3497 ↗
26. Panerai, F. et al. Morphological evolution of ordinary chondrite microstructure during heating: Implications for atmospheric entry. Planet. Sci. J. 2, 179 (2021).10.3847/PSJ/ac1749 ↗
27. Dahari, A., Kench, S., Squires, I. & Cooper, S. J. Fusion of complementary 2D and 3D mesostructural datasets using generative adversarial networks. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2202407 (2023).10.1002/aenm.202202407 ↗
28. Goodfellow, I. J. et al. Generative adversarial networks http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661. ArXiv:1406.2661 [cs, stat]. (2014).
29. Mosser, L., Dubrule, O. & Blunt, M. J. Reconstruction of three-dimensional porous media using generative adversarial neural networks. Phys. Rev. E 96, 043309 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevE.96.043309 ↗
30. Squires, I., Dahari, A., Cooper, S. J. & Kench, S. Artefact removal from micrographs with deep learning based inpainting. Digit. Discov. 2, 316–326 (2023).10.1039/D2DD00120A ↗
31. Furat, O. et al. Super-resolving microscopy images of li-ion electrodes for fine-feature quantification using generative adversarial networks. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 1–11 (2022).10.1038/s41524-022-00749-z ↗
32. Yi, X., Walia, E. & Babyn, P. Generative adversarial network in medical imaging: a review. Med. Image Anal. 58, 101552 (2019).10.1016/j.media.2019.101552 ↗
33. Kench, S. & Cooper, S. J. Generating three-dimensional structures from a two-dimensional slice with generative adversarial network-based dimensionality expansion. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 299–305 (2021).10.1038/s42256-021-00322-1 ↗
34. McKeon, T. Ablative degradation of a silicone foam. J. Macromol. Sci.: Part A - Chem. 3, 585–612 (1969).10.1080/10601326908053831 ↗
35. Oruganti, S., Mansour, N. N., Panesi, M. & Panerai, F. Microstructure of pyrolyzing RTV silicone. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 207, 110237 (2023).10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.110237 ↗
36. Bessire, B. K., Lahankar, S. A. & Minton, T. K. Pyrolysis of phenolic impregnated carbon ablator (PICA). ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 1383–1395 (2015).10.1021/am507816f ↗
37. Torres-Herrador, F. et al. Decomposition of carbon/phenolic composites for aerospace heatshields: detailed speciation of phenolic resin pyrolysis products. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 119, 107079 (2021).10.1016/j.ast.2021.107079 ↗
38. Sakraker, I., Chazot, O. & Carvalho, J. P. Performance of cork-based thermal protection material P50 exposed to air plasma. CEAS Space J. 14, 377–393 (2022).10.1007/s12567-021-00395-z ↗
39. Pereira, H. Cork: Biology, Production and Uses 1st edn (Elsevier, 2007).10.1016/B978-044452967-1/50002-9 ↗
40. Shangguan, W., Chen, Z., Zhao, J. & Song, X. Thermogravimetric analysis of cork and cork components from quercus variabilis. Wood Sci. Technol. 52, 181–192 (2018).10.1007/s00226-017-0959-9 ↗
41. Yang, H., Yan, R., Chen, H., Lee, D. H. & Zheng, C. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86, 1781–1788 (2007).10.1016/j.fuel.2006.12.013 ↗
42. Yao, F., Wu, Q., Lei, Y., Guo, W. & Xu, Y. Thermal decomposition kinetics of natural fibers: activation energy with dynamic thermogravimetric analysis. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 93, 90–98 (2008).10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.10.012 ↗
43. Bessire, B. K. & Minton, T. K. Decomposition of phenolic impregnated carbon ablator (PICA) as a function of temperature and heating rate. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 21422–21437 (2017).10.1021/acsami.7b03919 ↗
44. Milos, F. S., Gasch, M. J. & Prabhu, D. K. Conformal phenolic impregnated carbon ablator arcjet testing, ablation, and thermal response. J. Spacecr. Rockets 52, 804–812 (2015).10.2514/1.A33216 ↗
45. Strauss, E. L. Low density ablator compositions https://patents.google.com/patent/US4031059A/en (1977).
46. Nam, J.-D. & Seferis, J. Volatile evolution in thermoset composites from processing to degradation. Sci. Eng. Compos. Mater. 2, 211–225 (1993).10.1515/SECM.1993.2.3.211 ↗
47. Virtanen, P. et al. Scipy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
48. Pelt, D. M. et al. Integration of tomopy and the astra toolbox for advanced processing and reconstruction of tomographic synchrotron data. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 23, 842–849 (2016).10.1107/S1600577516005658 ↗
49. Gürsoy, D., De Carlo, F., Xiao, X. & Jacobsen, C. Tomopy: a framework for the analysis of synchrotron tomographic data. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 21, 1188–1193 (2014).10.1107/S1600577514013939 ↗
50. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).10.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
51. Otsu, N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. 9, 62–66 (1979).10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 ↗
52. van der Walt, S. et al. scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ 2, e453 (2014).10.7717/peerj.453 ↗
53. Kench, S., Squires, I. & Cooper, S. TauFactor 2: a GPU accelerated python tool for microstructural analysis. J. Open Source Softw. 8, 5358 (2023).10.21105/joss.05358 ↗