Effect of volume fractions and aging on Ni-GDC SOFC anode degradation and performance: multiphase-field simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Enhancing the performance and durability of solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) requires concurrent improvements in electrochemical activity and mechanical integrity, both strongly dependent on the initial anode microstructure and its degradation over long-term operation. This study presents a comprehensive degradation investigation for nickel-gadolinium doped ceria (Ni-GDC) SOFC anode microstructures, combining the generation of realistic synthetic microstructures and large-scale aging simulations. Synthetic microstructures are generated and quantitatively validated against experimental reconstructions of Ni-GDC employing an enhanced structure generator workflow that incorporates sintering-like morphological coalescence, resulting in digital twins for optimization studies. Representative synthetic microstructures are generated with systematically varying phase volume fractions and subjected to long-term (2000 h) aging using a validated multiphase-field model. Electrochemical performance descriptors, including triple-phase boundary (TPB), double-phase boundary (DPB) densities, phase tortuosities, and mechanical properties, such as elastic moduli and stress distributions resulting from thermal expansion coefficient mismatch between Ni and GDC, are collectively analyzed. The results provide detailed insights into the design of anode microstructures by highlighting trade-offs between initial and degradation-induced electrochemical and mechanical performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (88)
Show source-provided references
1. Yamamoto, K., Qiu, N. & Ohara, S. In situ fabrication of high-performance Ni-GDC-nanocube core-shell anode for low-temperature solid-oxide fuel cells. Sci. Rep. 5, 17433 (2015).10.1038/srep17433 ↗
2. Jaiswal, N. et al. A brief review on ceria based solid electrolytes for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloy. Compd. 781, 984–1005 (2019).10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.015 ↗
3. Zhang, J., Lenser, C., Menzler, N. H. & Guillon, O. Comparison of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) electrolyte materials for operation at 500 c. Solid State Ion. 344, 115138 (2020).10.1016/j.ssi.2019.115138 ↗
4. Eguchi, K., Setoguchi, T., Inoue, T. & Arai, H. Electrical properties of ceria-based oxides and their application to solid oxide fuel cells. Solid State Ion. 52, 165–172 (1992).10.1016/0167-2738(92)90102-U ↗
5. Zekri, A., Knipper, M., Parisi, J. & Plaggenborg, T. Microstructure degradation of Ni/Cgo anodes for solid oxide fuel cells after long operation time using 3D reconstructions by fib tomography. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 13767–13777 (2017).10.1039/C7CP02186K ↗
6. Fang, Q., Frey, C. E., Menzler, N. H. & Blum, L. Electrochemical performance and preliminary post-mortem analysis of a solid oxide cell stack with 20,000 h of operation. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, F38 (2018).10.1149/2.0541802jes ↗
7. Trini, M. et al. Comparison of microstructural evolution of fuel electrodes in solid oxide fuel cells and electrolysis cells. J. Power Sources 450, 227599 (2020).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227599 ↗
8. Holzer, L. et al. Microstructure degradation of cermet anodes for solid oxide fuel cells: Quantification of nickel grain growth in dry and in humid atmospheres. J. Power Sources 196, 1279–1294 (2011).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.017 ↗
9. Liu, Y. et al. Microstructural changes in nickel-ceria fuel electrodes at elevated temperature. Fuel Cells 23, 430–441 (2023).10.1002/fuce.202300057 ↗
10. Steinbach, I. & Pezzolla, F. A generalized field method for multiphase transformations using interface fields. Phys. D. 134, 385–393 (1999).10.1016/S0167-2789(99)00129-3 ↗
11. Nestler, B. & Choudhury, A. Phase-field modeling of multi-component systems. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 15, 93–105 (2011).10.1016/j.cossms.2011.01.003 ↗
12. Prahs, A., Schneider, D. & Nestler, B. A continuum thermodynamic approach to the phase-field method: the order parameter as internal state variable. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 37, 55 (2025).10.1007/s00161-025-01383-y ↗
13. Prahs, A., Elmoghazy, A., Schneider, D. & Nestler, B. The multiphase-field method based on internal state variables. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 38, 47 (2026).10.1007/s00161-026-01470-8 ↗
14. Chen, H.Y. et al. Simulation of coarsening in three-phase solid oxide fuel cell anodes. J. Power Sources 196, 1333–1337 (2011).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.010 ↗
15. Li, Q., Liang, L., Gerdes, K. & Chen, L.-Q. Phase-field modeling of three-phase electrode microstructures in solid oxide fuel cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 033909 (2012).10.1063/1.4738230 ↗
16. Jiao, Z. & Shikazono, N. Simulation of the reduction process of solid oxide fuel cell composite anode based on phase field method. J. Power Sources 305, 10–16 (2016).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.11.061 ↗
17. Wang, Y. et al. Morphology and performance evolution of anode microstructure in solid oxide fuel cell: A model-based quantitative analysis. Appl. Energy Combust. Sci. 5, 100016 (2021).
18. Yang, S. et al. Ni coarsening in ni-yttria stabilized zirconia electrodes: Three-dimensional quantitative phase-field simulations supported by ex-situ ptychographic nano-tomography. Acta Mater. 246, 118708 (2023).10.1016/j.actamat.2023.118708 ↗
19. Hoffrogge, P. W. et al. Performance estimation by multiphase-field simulations and transmission-line modeling of nickel coarsening in fib-sem reconstructed Ni-YSZ SOFC anodes i: Influence of wetting angle. J. Power Sources 570, 233031 (2023).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233031 ↗
20. Choudhury, A. & Nestler, B. Grand-potential formulation for multicomponent phase transformations combined with thin-interface asymptotics of the double-obstacle potential. Phys. Rev. E 85, 021602 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevE.85.021602 ↗
21. Hoffrogge, P. W. et al. Multiphase-field model for surface diffusion and attachment kinetics in the grand-potential framework. Phys. Rev. E 103, 033307 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevE.103.033307 ↗
22. Sun, M. et al. Microstructure evolution and performance evaluation of nickel/gadolinium-doped ceria fuel electrode for solid oxide fuel cell investigated by integrated meso-scale modeling. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5037533 (2024).10.2139/ssrn.5037533 ↗
23. Chang, Z., Bao, C., Lu, X. & Mi, S. Numerical reconstruction and evolution of nickel and gadolinium doped ceria anode microstructure based on phase-field method. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 172, 151141 (2025).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.151141 ↗
24. Jeela, R. et al. Multiphase-field simulation studies of coarsening in Ni-GDC SOFC anode microstructures and the effect of interfacial energies. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 8, 17670–17687 (2025).10.1021/acsaem.5c02218 ↗
25. Jeela, R. et al. Enhancing solid oxide fuel cells development through Bayesian active learning. Adv. Energy Mater. 15, 2501216 (2025).10.1002/aenm.202501216 ↗
26. Pace3D (Phase-field Algorithms for Computational Engineering in 3D) (KIT). https://www.iam.kit.edu/mms/pace3d.php (2026)
27. Hötzer, J. et al. The parallel multi-physics phase-field framework pace3d. J. Comput. Sci. 26, 1–12 (2018).10.1016/j.jocs.2018.02.011 ↗
28. Seiz, M. et al. Phase-field simulations with the grand potential approach (2021).10.1007/978-3-030-80602-6_37 ↗
29. Selcuk, A. & Atkinson, A. Elastic properties of ceramic oxides used in solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 17, 1523–1532 (1997).10.1016/S0955-2219(96)00247-6 ↗
30. Radovic, M. & Lara-Curzio, E. Mechanical properties of tape cast nickel-based anode materials for solid oxide fuel cells before and after reduction in hydrogen. Acta Mater. 52, 5747–5756 (2004).10.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.023 ↗
31. Nakajo, A. et al. Compilation of mechanical properties for the structural analysis of solid oxide fuel cell stacks. constitutive materials of anode-supported cells. Ceram. Int. 38, 3907–3927 (2012).10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.01.043 ↗
32. Basu, R., Kumar, S. S., Mukhopadhyay, A. K. & Maiti, H. S. Improvement in mechanical properties of anode-supported planar SOFC. ECS Trans. 7, 533–541 (2007).10.1149/1.2729133 ↗
33. Liu, X. et al. Correlation between microstructures and macroscopic properties of nickel/yttria-stabilized zirconia (Ni-YSZ) anodes: Meso-scale modeling and deep learning with convolutional neural networks. Energy AI 7, 100122 (2022).10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100122 ↗
34. Elmoghazy, A. et al. Investigations on the microstructural degradation and mechanical response of Ni-CGO anodes using phase-field method and stochastic modeling. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6749426 (2026).10.2139/ssrn.6749426 ↗
35. Kim, Y. J. & Lee, M. C. Numerical investigation of flow/heat transfer and structural stress in a planar solid oxide fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 42, 18504–18513 (2017).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.140 ↗
36. Yeong, C. L. & Torquato, S. Reconstructing random media. Phys. Rev. E 57, 495 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevE.57.495 ↗
37. Westhoff, D., Manke, I. & Schmidt, V. Generation of virtual lithium-ion battery electrode microstructures based on spatial stochastic modeling. Comput. Mater. Sci. 151, 53–64 (2018).10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.060 ↗
38. Gayon-Lombardo, A., Mosser, L., Brandon, N. P. & Cooper, S. J. Pores for thought: generative adversarial networks for stochastic reconstruction of 3d multi-phase electrode microstructures with periodic boundaries. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 82 (2020).10.1038/s41524-020-0340-7 ↗
39. Abbaspour, A., Luo, J.-L. & Nandakumar, K. Three-dimensional random resistor-network model for solid oxide fuel cell composite electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 55, 3944–3950 (2010).10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.049 ↗
40. Zheng, K. & Ni, M. Reconstruction of solid oxide fuel cell electrode microstructure and analysis of its effective conductivity. Sci. Bull. 61, 78–85 (2016).10.1007/s11434-015-0946-1 ↗
41. Schöller, L., Wehner, L., Schneider, D., Schwaiger, R. & Nestler, B. Virtual design of multilayered SOFC microstructures based on particlepacking and spherical harmonics. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/ae7138 (2026).10.1088/1361-651X/ae7138 ↗
42. Feinauer, J. et al. Stochastic 3d modeling of the microstructure of lithium-ion battery anodes via Gaussian random fields on the sphere. Comput. Mater. Sci. 109, 137–146 (2015).10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.06.025 ↗
43. Timurkutluk, B., Ciflik, Y., Altan, T. & Genc, O. Synthetical designing of solid oxide fuel cell electrodes: Effect of particle size and volume fraction. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 47, 31446–31458 (2022).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.071 ↗
44. Prioux, M. et al. Numerical microstructural optimization for the hydrogen electrode of solid oxide cells. Fuel Cells 23, 408–419 (2023).10.1002/fuce.202300029 ↗
45. Muetter, F. et al. Artificial intelligence for solid oxide fuel cells: Combining automated high accuracy artificial neural network model generation and genetic algorithm for time-efficient performance prediction and optimization. Energy Convers. Manag. 291, 117263 (2023).10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117263 ↗
46. Peng, J., Zhao, D., Xu, Y., Wu, X. & Li, X. Comprehensive analysis of solid oxide fuel cell performance degradation mechanism, prediction, and optimization studies. Energies 16, 788 (2023).10.3390/en16020788 ↗
47. Nestler, B., Wendler, F., Selzer, M., Stinner, B. & Garcke, H. Phase-field model for multiphase systems with preserved volume fractions. Phys. Rev. E 78, 011604 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevE.78.011604 ↗
48. Schoof, E. et al. Multiphase-field modeling of martensitic phase transformation in a dual-phase microstructure. Int. J. Solids Struct. 134, 181–194 (2018).10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.10.032 ↗
49. Chen, D., Lin, Z., Zhu, H. & Kee, R. J. Percolation theory to predict effective properties of solid oxide fuel-cell composite electrodes. J. Power Sources 191, 240–252 (2009).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.051 ↗
50. Kenney, B., Valdmanis, M., Baker, C., Pharoah, J. & Karan, K. Computation of tpb length, surface area and pore size from numerical reconstruction of composite solid oxide fuel cell electrodes. J. Power Sources 189, 1051–1059 (2009).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.145 ↗
51. Bertei, A. & Nicolella, C. Percolation theory in SOFC composite electrodes: Effects of porosity and particle size distribution on effective properties. J. Power Sources 196, 9429–9436 (2011).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.087 ↗
52. Wang, S., Kobayashi, T., Dokiya, M. & Hashimoto, T. Electrical and ionic conductivity of Gd-doped ceria. J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 3606 (2000).10.1149/1.1393946 ↗
53. Gibson, L. J. & Ashby, M. F.Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties Cambridge University Press, (1997).10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
54. Pihlatie, M., Kaiser, A. & Mogensen, M. Mechanical properties of nio/ni–ysz composites depending on temperature, porosity and redox cycling. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 29, 1657–1664 (2009).10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.10.017 ↗
55. Pabst, W., Gregorová, E. & Tichá, G. Elasticity of porous ceramics-a critical study of modulus- porosity relations. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 26, 1085–1097 (2006).10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.01.041 ↗
56. Kishimoto, M., Lomberg, M., Ruiz-Trejo, E. & Brandon, N. P. Numerical modeling of nickel-infiltrated gadolinium-doped ceria electrodes reconstructed with focused ion beam tomography. Electrochim. Acta 190, 178–185 (2016).10.1016/j.electacta.2015.12.044 ↗
57. Xiang, Y., Da, Y., Shikazono, N. & Jiao, Z. Quantitative study on solid oxide fuel cell anode microstructure stability based on 3d microstructure reconstructions. J. Power Sources 477, 228653 (2020).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228653 ↗
58. Vivet, N. et al. Effect of Ni content in SOFC Ni-ysz cermets: A three-dimensional study by fib-sem tomography. J. Power Sources 196, 9989–9997 (2011).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.07.010 ↗
59. Hoffrogge, P. W.Understanding degradation phenomena in solid-oxide fuel-cell anodes by phase-field modeling and analytics, KIT Scientific Publishing, (2024).
60. Miyawaki, K., Kishimoto, M., Iwai, H., Saito, M. & Yoshida, H. Comprehensive understanding of the active thickness in solid oxide fuel cell anodes using experimental, numerical and semi-analytical approach. J. Power Sources 267, 503–514 (2014).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.112 ↗
61. Chueh, W. C., Hao, Y., Jung, W. & Haile, S. M. High electrochemical activity of the oxide phase in model ceria–pt and ceria–ni composite anodes. Nat. Mater. 11, 155–161 (2012).10.1038/nmat3184 ↗
62. Nakamura, T. et al. Determination of the reaction zone in gadolinia-doped ceria anode for solid oxide fuel cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, B1244–B1250 (2008).10.1149/1.2975322 ↗
63. Nakamura, T. et al. Electrochemical behaviors of mixed conducting oxide anodes for solid oxide fuel cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, B563–B569 (2008).10.1149/1.2901047 ↗
64. Brus, G., Iwai, H. & Szmyd, J. S. An anisotropic microstructure evolution in a solid oxide fuel cell anode. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 15, 3 (2020).10.1186/s11671-019-3226-1 ↗
65. Xiang, Y., Da, Y., Zhong, Z., Shikazono, N. & Jiao, Z. Thermo-mechanical stress analyses of solid oxide fuel cell anode based on three-dimensional microstructure reconstruction. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45, 19791–19800 (2020).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.121 ↗
66. Celik, S., Ibrahimoglu, B., Toros, S. & Mat, M. D. Three dimensional stress analysis of solid oxide fuel cell anode micro structure. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39, 19119–19131 (2014).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.09.110 ↗
67. Nestler, B., Garcke, H. & Stinner, B. Multicomponent alloy solidification: phase-field modeling and simulations. Phys. Rev. E 71, 041609 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevE.71.041609 ↗
68. Allen, S. M. & Cahn, J. W. A microscopic theory for antiphase boundary motion and its application to antiphase domain coarsening. Acta Metall. 27, 1085–1095 (1979).10.1016/0001-6160(79)90196-2 ↗
69. Sun, Y. & Beckermann, C. Sharp interface tracking using the phase-field equation. J. Comput. Phys. 220, 626–653 (2007).10.1016/j.jcp.2006.05.025 ↗
70. Chen, C., Lin, H. & Lan, C. Phase field modeling with large interface thickness and undercooling. J. Cryst. Growth 385, 121–126 (2014).10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.03.053 ↗
71. Schneider, D. et al. Phase-field elasticity model based on mechanical jump conditions. Comput. Mech. 55, 887–901 (2015).10.1007/s00466-015-1141-6 ↗
72. Durga, A., Wollants, P. & Moelans, N. Evaluation of interfacial excess contributions in different phase-field models for elastically inhomogeneous systems. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 21, 055018 (2013).10.1088/0965-0393/21/5/055018 ↗
73. Mosler, J., Shchyglo, O. & Hojjat, H. M. A novel homogenization method for phase field approaches based on partial rank-one relaxation. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 68, 251–266 (2014).10.1016/j.jmps.2014.04.002 ↗
74. Schneider, D. et al. On the stress calculation within phase-field approaches: a model for finite deformations. Comput. Mech. 60, 203–217 (2017).10.1007/s00466-017-1401-8 ↗
75. Münch, B. & Holzer, L. Contradicting geometrical concepts in pore size analysis attained with electron microscopy and mercury intrusion. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 4059–4067 (2008).10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02736.x ↗
76. Joos, J., Carraro, T., Weber, A. & Ivers-Tiffée, E. Reconstruction of porous electrodes by fib/sem for detailed microstructure modeling. J. Power Sources 196, 7302–7307 (2011).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.006 ↗
77. Palágyi, K. & Kuba, A. A 3d 6-subiteration thinning algorithm for extracting medial lines. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 19, 613–627 (1998).10.1016/S0167-8655(98)00031-2 ↗
78. Bertram, A. Elasticity and plasticity of large deformations: including gradient materials. Springer Nature, (2021).10.1007/978-3-030-72328-6 ↗
79. Böhlke, T. & Brüggemann, C. Graphical representation of the generalized Hooke’s law. Tech. Mech. 21, 145–158 (2001).
80. Hill, R. The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate. Proc. Phys. Soc. A 65, 349 (1952).10.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307 ↗
81. Joos, J. Microstructural characterisation, modelling and simulation of solid oxide fuel cell cathodes, vol. 30 KIT Scientific Publishing, (2017).
82. Institute of Digital Materials Science (IDM), Karlsruhe University of Applied Sciences. Pace3D – A Parallel Phase-Field Framework. https://www.h-ka.de/en/idm/profile/pace3d-software (2025).
83. Thompson, A. P. et al. LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comp. Phys. Comm. 271, 108171 (2022).10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
84. Akiba, T., Sano, S., Yanase, T., Ohta, T. & Koyama, M. Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. In Proc. of the 25th ACM SIGK DD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2623–2631 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2019).10.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗
85. Farraro, R. & Mclellan, R. B. Temperature dependence of the young’s modulus and shear modulus of pure nickel, platinum, and molybdenum. Metall. Trans. A 8, 1563–1565 (1977).10.1007/BF02644859 ↗
86. Hidnert, P. Thermal expansion of some nickel alloys. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand 58, 89 (1957).10.6028/jres.058.011 ↗
87. Fan, X., Case, E. D., Yang, Q. & Nicholas, J. D. Room temperature elastic properties of gadolinia-doped ceria as a function of porosity. Ceram. Int. 39, 6877–6886 (2013).10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.02.022 ↗
88. Andersen, K. B., Charlas, B., Stamate, E. & Hansen, K. K. Permeability, strength and electrochemical studies on ceramic multilayers for solid-state electrochemical cells. Heliyon 3, e00371 (2017).10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00371 ↗