In-situ monitoring of seeded and unseeded stage III corrosion using Raman spectroscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Stage III glass dissolution, the occasionally observed tendency for accelerated aqueous corrosion after extensive time spent at low reaction rates, is a major area of technical uncertainty in long-term glass performance modeling for vitreous nuclear waste forms. Stage III dissolution behavior is thought to be caused by the precipitation of zeolite phases that lower the activity of the rate-controlling orthosilicic acid ion and cause the acceleration of glass dissolution. The uncertainty lies mainly in a poor understanding of the growth kinetics of these key crystalline phases. It is particularly important to understand the impact of temperature and pH conditions on Stage III behavior. Accurate analysis of this phenomenon is complicated by the typically very long (e.g., years), and variable length of the induction period preceding the onset of Stage III behavior. In this study of a high-sodium aluminoborosilicate glass, we demonstrate the ability to initiate the onset of Stage III behavior in a controllable fashion so as to both reduce the time delay of the incubation period, and to also be able to initiate Stage III dissolution in controlled conditions. In this case, we demonstrate that Stage III glass corrosion behavior is possible at 70 °C, a lower temperature than previously observed (90 °C), even in an unseeded experiment. We confirm, through a comparison study, that seeded and unseeded Stage III corrosion rates are equivalent. This enables wide-scale testing of Stage III corrosion rates for many glass compositions in relatively short times through this technique. We also report further development of the use of in situ Raman spectroscopy monitoring of boron concentration and pH through simple and chemometric analysis methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Van Iseghem, P. & Grambow, B. The Long-Term Corrosion and Modelling of Two Simulated Belgian Reference High-Level Waste Glasses. (Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1988).10.1557/PROC-112-631 ↗
2. Papathanassiu, A. et al. ILAW Glass Testing for Disposal at IDF: Phase 1 Testing, Vitreous State Laboratory. (The Catholic University of America, VSL-11R2270-1, 2011).10.2172/1266842 ↗
3. Pierce, E. M. et al. Accelerated weathering of high-level and plutonium-bearing lanthanide borosilicate waste glasses under hydraulically unsaturated conditions. Appl. Geo. 22, 1841–1859 (2007).10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.03.056 ↗
4. Bacon, D. H. & Pierce, E. M. Sensitivity Analysis of Kinetic Rate-Law Parameters Used to Simulate Long-Term Weathering of ILAW Glass. (PNNL-19472, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, 2010).
5. Ribet, S. et al. Compositional effects on the long-term durability of nuclear waste glasses: a statistical approach. MRS Online Proc. Libr. Arch. 824, CC5.3 (2004).10.1557/PROC-824-CC5.3 ↗
6. Ribet, S. & Gin, S. Role of neoformed phases on the mechanisms controlling the resumption of SON68 glass alteration in alkaline media. J. Nucl. Mater. 324, 152–164 (2004).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.09.010 ↗
7. Strachan, D. M. & Croak, T. L. Compositional effects on long-term dissolution of borosilicate glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 272, 22–33 (2000).10.1016/S0022-3093(00)00154-X ↗
8. Fournier, M. et al. Effect of zeolite formation on borosilicate glass dissolution kinetics. Procedia Earth Planet. Sci. 7, 264–267 (2013).10.1016/j.proeps.2013.03.085 ↗
9. Jantzen, C. M. et al. Accelerated Leach Testing of GLASS (ALTGLASS): I. Informatics approach to high level waste glass gel formation and aging. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 8, 69–83 (2017).10.1111/ijag.12262 ↗
10. Ebert, W. L. et al. Measurement of the Glass Dissolution Rate in the Presence of Alteration Phases, from Proceedings International Topical Meeting on Nuclear and Hazardous Waste Management. (Spectrum ‘96, Seattle, 1996).
11. Wronkiewicz, D. J. & Arbesman, K. A. The role of alteration phases in influencing the kinetics of glass dissolution. MRS Proc. 608, 745 (1999).10.1557/PROC-608-745 ↗
12. Fournier, M. Etude des mécanismes à l’origine des reprises d’altération: Modélisation et impact sur les verres de confinement [Study of the mechanisms underlying resumptions of alteration: Modeling and evaluation of the impact on nuclear waste glasses], Thesis, Université Montpellier, (2015).
13. Taylor, A. M. & Roy, R. Zeolite studies iv: Na-P zeolites and the ion-exchanged derivatives of tetragonal Na-P1. Am. Mineral. 49, 656–682 (1964).
14. Ruppert, D. & Wand, M. P. Multivariate locally weighted least-squares regression. Ann. Stat. 22, 1346–1370 (1994).10.1214/aos/1176325632 ↗
15. Wise, B. M. et al. Manual PLS_Toolbox, Version 4.0. (Eigenvector Research Inc, Wenatchee, 2006).
16. Parruzot, B. et al. Method for the in situ measurement of pH and alteration extent for aluminoborosilicate glasses using Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 90, 11812–11819 (2018).10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00960 ↗
17. Casella, A. J. et al. Development of online spectroscopic pH monitoring for nuclear fuel reprocessing plants: weak acid schemes. Anal. Chem. 87, 5139–5147 (2015).10.1021/ac504578t ↗
18. Siclen, C. D. Van Random nucleation and growth kinetics. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11845–11848 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11845 ↗
19. H. Ghobarkar, H. et al. The Reconstruction of Natural Zeolites. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2003).10.1007/978-1-4419-9142-3 ↗
20. Mostafa, N. Y., Garib, R. A., Heiba, Z. K., Abd-Elkader, O. H. & Al-Majthoub, M. M. Synthesis of pure zeolite P2 from calcium silicate hydrate tobermorite. Orient J. Chem. 31, (2015). https://doi.org/10.13005/ojc/310254.10.13005/ojc/310254 ↗
21. Crovisier, J. L. et al. Nature and role of natural alteration gels formed on the surface of ancient volcanic glasses (Natural analogs of waste containment glasses). J. Nucl. Mater. 321, 91–109 (2003).10.1016/S0022-3115(03)00206-X ↗
22. Parruzot, B. Altération des verres basaltiques dans des environnements confinés: analogie avec le stockage géologique des verres nucléaires [Basaltic glass alteration in confined environments: analogy to nuclear waste glass geological repository]. Thesis, Université Montpellier 2, (2014).
23. Jantzen, C. M. et al. Accelerated Leach Testing of Glass (ALTGLASS): II. Mineralization of hydrogels by leachate strong bases. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 8, 84–96 (2017).10.1111/ijag.12264 ↗
24. Trivelpiece, C. L. et al. Corrosion of ISG fibers in alkaline solutions. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 100, 4533–4547 (2017).10.1111/jace.14950 ↗
25. ASTM C1285-14. Standard Test Methods for Determining Chemical Durability of Nuclear, Hazardous, and Mixed Waste Glasses and Multiphase Glass Ceramics: The Product Consistency Test (PCT). (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2014).
26. Oleksiak, M. D. et al. Synthesis strategies for ultrastable zeolite GIS polymorphs as sorbents for selective separations. Chem. A Eur. J. 22, 16078–16088 (2016).10.1002/chem.201602653 ↗
27. ASTM D1193-06. Standard Specification for Reagent Water. (ASTM International, West Conshohocken, 2018).
28. George, J. L. & Brow, R. K. In-situ characterization of borate glass dissolution kinetics by μ-Raman spectroscopy. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 426, 116–124 (2015).10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.07.003 ↗
29. Beebe, K. R. et al. Chemometrics: A Practical Guide. (Wiley, New York, 1998).
30. Bro, R. & Elden, L. PLS works. J. Chemom. 23, 69–71 (2009).10.1002/cem.1177 ↗
31. Lines, A. M. et al. Multivariate analysis for quantification of plutonium (IV) in nitric acid based on absorption spectra. Anal. Chem. 89, 9354–9359 (2017).10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02161 ↗