Fusion of multi source data for atmospheric corrosion evaluation using sensors and image recognition
Source abstract
Abstract
Detecting corrosion in Q235 steel is crucial for ensuring the safety and maintenance of industrial facilities. In this study, we present a novel approach that combines image recognition techniques with corrosion sensor data to improve both the accuracy and real-time capabilities of corrosion monitoring. Our findings show that integrating image recognition significantly enhances the predictive power of atmospheric corrosion models. This improvement is attributed to the strong correlation between image texture features, contrast, and material corrosion. By integrating diverse data sources, we have developed a rapid atmospheric corrosion evaluation model, Qcorr, for efficient assessment of outdoor Q235 steel corrosion. We believe the Qcorr model will be a valuable tool for practical corrosion detection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Conservation Techniques and Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Revie, R. W. Corrosion and Corrosion Control: An Introduction to Corrosion Science and Engineering. (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).10.1002/9780470277270 ↗
2. Koch, G. H., Brongers, M. P., Thompson, N. G., Virmani, Y. P. & Payer, J. H. Corrosion Cost and Preventive Strategies in the United States. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40697 (2002).
3. Guo, X. et al. High-throughput screening of green amino acid and surfactant mixtures with high corrosion inhibition efficiency: experimental and modelling perspectives. Corros. Sci. 240, 112460 (2024).10.1016/j.corsci.2024.112460 ↗
4. Guo, X. et al. Understanding the adsorption of imidazole corrosion inhibitor at the copper/water interface by ab initio molecular dynamics. Corros. Sci. 236, 112237 (2024).10.1016/j.corsci.2024.112237 ↗
5. Fu, Z., Guo, X., Zhang, X., Legut, D. & Zhang, D. Towards rational design of organic copper corrosion inhibitors: high-throughput computational evaluation of standard adsorption gibbs energy. Corros. Sci. 227, 111783 (2024).10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111783 ↗
6. Hossain, N., Asaduzzaman Chowdhury, M. & Kchaou, M. An overview of green corrosion inhibitors for sustainable and environment friendly industrial development. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 35, 673–690 (2021).10.1080/01694243.2020.1816793 ↗
7. Shekari, E., Khan, F. & Ahmed, S. Economic risk analysis of pitting corrosion in process facilities. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 157, 51–62 (2017).10.1016/j.ijpvp.2017.08.005 ↗
8. Hussein Khalaf, A. et al. Emerging AI technologies for corrosion monitoring in oil and gas industry: a comprehensive review. Eng. Fail. Anal. 155, 107735 (2024).10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107735 ↗
9. Charles, S., L’Hostis, V. & Poyet, S. Visual parameters of chloride-induced corrosion of reinforced concrete structures. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 15, 9–24 (2011).10.1080/19648189.2011.9693304 ↗
10. Wang, B. et al. Data-driven optimization model customization for atmospheric corrosion on low-alloy steel: incorporating the dynamic evolution of the surface rust layer. Corros. Sci. 221, 111349 (2023).10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111349 ↗
11. Yang, X. et al. Data-mining and atmospheric corrosion resistance evaluation of Sn- and Sb-additional low alloy steel based on big data technology. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 29, 825–835 (2022).10.1007/s12613-022-2457-9 ↗
12. Li, Q. et al. Long-term corrosion monitoring of carbon steels and environmental correlation analysis via the random forest method. Npj Mater. Degrad. 6, 1–9 (2022).10.1038/s41529-021-00211-3 ↗
13. Yang, L., Cheng, X. & Li, X. The beneficial role of Sn in rapid rust stabilization of weathering steel in marine environments. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-024-2975-8 (2024).10.1007/s12613-024-2975-8 ↗
14. Di, X. U., Xiaojia, Y., Qing, L. I., Xuequn, C. & Xiaogang, L. I. Review on corrosion test methods and evaluation techniques for materials in atmospheric environment. J. Chin. Soc. Corros. Prot. 42, 447–457 (2021).
15. Xu, D. et al. A review of trends in corrosion-resistant structural steels research—from theoretical simulation to data-driven directions. Materials 16, 3396 (2023).10.3390/ma16093396 ↗
16. Vangrunderbeek, V. et al. Exploring the potential of transfer learning in extrapolating accelerated corrosion test data for long-term atmospheric corrosion forecasting. Corros. Sci. 225, 111619 (2023).10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111619 ↗
17. Xia, D.-H. et al. Electrochemical measurements used for assessment of corrosion and protection of metallic materials in the field: a critical review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 112, 151–183 (2022).10.1016/j.jmst.2021.11.004 ↗
18. Wang, X., Huang, F., Hu, Q., Zhang, J. & Liu, J. Galvanic corrosion behavior of welded joint in marine atmosphere environment based on capillary microcell. Npj Mater. Degrad. 8, 1 (2024).10.1038/s41529-023-00417-7 ↗
19. Wang, P. et al. Study of rust layer evolution in Q345 weathering steel utilizing electric resistance probes. Corros. Sci. 225, 111595 (2023).10.1016/j.corsci.2023.111595 ↗
20. Yang, L. et al. Corrosion resistance optimization of Sn-additional low-alloy high strength steel by data-driven identification and field exposure verification. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 25, 3624–3641 (2023).10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.159 ↗
21. Pei, Z. et al. Towards understanding and prediction of atmospheric corrosion of an Fe/Cu corrosion sensor via machine learning. Corros. Sci. 170, 108697 (2020).10.1016/j.corsci.2020.108697 ↗
22. Zhi, Y. et al. Improving atmospheric corrosion prediction through key environmental factor identification by random forest-based model. Corros. Sci. 178, 109084 (2021).10.1016/j.corsci.2020.109084 ↗
23. Yang, L. et al. Investigation of rust layer on low alloy steel with 0.40 wt% Sn in a rural atmospheric environment. Constr. Build. Mater. 402, 133029 (2023).10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133029 ↗
24. Wang, B. et al. Identification of corrosion factors in blast furnace gas pipe network with corrosion big data online monitoring technology. Corros. Sci. 230, 111906 (2024).10.1016/j.corsci.2024.111906 ↗
25. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G. E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun. ACM 60, 84–90 (2017).10.1145/3065386 ↗
26. Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. Preprint at arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556 (2015).
27. Hughes, J. F. Computer Graphics: Principles and Practice. (Pearson Education, 2014).
28. Wang, B. et al. Advanced multi-image segmentation-based machine learning modeling strategy for corrosion prediction and rust layer performance evaluation of weathering steel. Corros. Sci. 237, 112334 (2024).10.1016/j.corsci.2024.112334 ↗
29. Aijazi, A. K., Malaterre, L., Tazir, M. L., Trassoudaine, L. & Checchin, P. Detecting and analyzing corrosion spots on the hull of large marine vessels using colored 3d lidar point clouds. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. III–3, 153–160 (2016).
30. Xu, D. et al. Mechanism and evaluation method of stress corrosion susceptibility of 904L stainless steel with optimized structure in seawater. Corros. Sci. 229, 111865 (2024).10.1016/j.corsci.2024.111865 ↗
31. Spearman, C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Int. J. Epidemiol. 39, 1137–1150 (2010).10.1093/ije/dyq191 ↗
32. Zhao, Y., Song, Y., Li, F. & Yan, X. Prediction of mechanical properties of cold rolled strip based on improved extreme random tree. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 30, 293–304 (2023).
33. Oh, S. W. & Kim, S. J. Approaching the computational color constancy as a classification problem through deep learning. Pattern Recognit 61, 405–416 (2017).10.1016/j.patcog.2016.08.013 ↗
34. Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M. & Maenpaa, T. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 971–987 (2002).10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1017623 ↗
35. Bharati, M. H., Liu, J. J. & MacGregor, J. F. Image texture analysis: methods and comparisons. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 72, 57–71 (2004).10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.02.005 ↗
36. Roberts, J. W., Van Aardt, J. & Ahmed, F. Assessment of image fusion procedures using entropy, image quality, and multispectral classification. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 2, 23522 (2008).10.1117/1.2945910 ↗
37. Huang, X. & Zhang, L. An SVM ensemble approach combining spectral, structural, and semantic features for the classification of high-resolution remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 51, 257–272 (2013).10.1109/TGRS.2012.2202912 ↗
38. Chen, W., Giger, M. L., Li, H., Bick, U. & Newstead, G. M. Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn. Reson. Med. 58, 562–571 (2007).10.1002/mrm.21347 ↗
39. Saeipourdizaj, P., Sarbakhsh, P. & Gholampour, A. Application of imputation methods for missing values of PM10 and O3 data: Interpolation, moving average and K-nearest neighbor methods. Environ. Health Eng. Manag. J. 8, 215–226 (2021).10.34172/EHEM.2021.25 ↗