journal article·2024-07-06Open access

A review of biomaterial degradation assessment approaches employed in the biomedical field

Hillary Mndlovu, Pradeep Kumar, Lisa C. du Toit, Yahya E. Choonara

npj Materials Degradation· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract The biological response to biomaterials plays a crucial role in selecting suitable materials for the formulation and development of tissue engineering platforms. Biodegradation is one of the properties that is considered in selecting appropriate biomaterials for biomedical applications. Biodegradation is the process of breaking down large molecules into smaller molecules with/without the aid of catalytic enzymes. The biodegradation process is crucial in the chemical absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) process of biomaterials and small molecules in the body. Degradation of biomaterials can be followed by assessing the physical, mechanical, and chemical attributes of biomaterials. There are several techniques/parameters that can be targeted when studying the degradation of biomaterials, with gravimetric analysis, surface erosion, and morphological changes being the largely employed techniques. However, the techniques present a few limitations, such as technical errors and material solubility being mistaken for degradation, and these techniques can infer but not confirm degradation as they do not provide the chemical composition of fragmenting/fragmented molecules. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) guidelines provide techniques and parameters for assessing biodegradation. However, the ASTM guidelines for degradation assessment approaches and techniques need to be updated to provide sufficient evidence to draw conclusive decisions regarding the degradation of biomaterials. In this review, the degradation assessment approaches and techniques are critically reviewed about their advantages and disadvantages, and to provide suggestions on how they can still play a role in assessing the degradation of biomaterials. This review could assist researchers employ cost-effective, efficient, and multiple degradation assessment techniques to evaluate and provide sufficient information about the degradation of biomaterials. Suggested future ASTM guidelines for assessing biodegradation should include measuring parameters (such as chemical, mechanical, or physical attributes of biomaterials) in real-time, employing non-invasive, continuous, and automated processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Alexander, M. Biodegradation and bioremediation, Gulf Professional Publishing (1999).
2. Palmese, L. L., Thapa, R. K., Sullivan, M. O. & Kiick, K. L. J. C. O. I. C. E. Hybrid hydrogels for biomedical applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 24, 143–157 (2019).10.1016/j.coche.2019.02.010 ↗
3. Mndlovu, H. et al. Bioplatform fabrication approaches affecting chitosan-based interpolymer complex properties and performance as wound dressings. Molecules 25, 222 (2020).10.3390/molecules25010222 ↗
4. Mndlovu, H. et al. Development of a fluid-absorptive alginate-chitosan bioplatform for potential application as a wound dressing. Carbohydr. Polym. 222, 114988 (2019).10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.114988 ↗
5. Ojo, O. A. et al. Nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 11, 8431–8445 (2021).
6. Rezić, I. J. P. Nanoparticles for biomedical application and their synthesis. Polymers 14, 4961 (2022).10.3390/polym14224961 ↗
7. Szymczyk-Ziółkowska, P. et al. A review of fabrication polymer scaffolds for biomedical applications using additive manufacturing techniques. Biocybern. Biomed. Eng. 40, 624–638 (2020).10.1016/j.bbe.2020.01.015 ↗
8. Varma, M. V., Kandasubramanian, B. & Ibrahim, S. M. 3D printed scaffolds for biomedical applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 255, 123642 (2020).10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123642 ↗
9. Kong, B. et al. Tailoring micro/nano-fibers for biomedical applications. Bioact. Mater. 19, 328–347 (2023).
10. Nair, L. S. & Laurencin, C. T. J. P. I. P. S. Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog. Polym. Sci. 32, 762–798 (2007).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.017 ↗
11. Cakmak, O. K. J. C. E., Sustainability. Biodegradable polymers—a review on properties, processing, and degradation mechanism. Circ. Econ. Sustain. 4, 339–362 (2024).10.1007/s43615-023-00277-y ↗
12. Lloyd, A. W. J. M. D. T. Interfacial bioengineering to enhance surface biocompatibility. Med. Device Technol. 13, 18–21 (2002).
13. Mierzwa-Hersztek, M., Gondek, K., Kopeć, M. J. J. O. P. & Environment, T. Degradation of polyethylene and biocomponent-derived polymer materials: an overview. J. Polym. Environ. 27, 600–611 (2019).10.1007/s10924-019-01368-4 ↗
14. Ghaffar, A., Schoenmakers, P. & Van Der Wal, S. J. C. R. I. A. C. Methods for the chemical analysis of degradable synthetic polymeric biomaterials. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 44, 23–40 (2014).10.1080/10408347.2013.831729 ↗
15. Cordes, E. & Bull, H. J. C. R. Mechanism and catalysis for hydrolysis of acetals, ketals, and ortho esters. Chem. Rev. 74, 581–603 (1974).10.1021/cr60291a004 ↗
16. Göpferich, A. J. T. B. S. J. C. Mechanisms of polymer degradation and erosion. Biomaterials: Silver Jubilee Compendium, 117–128 (1996)10.1016/B978-008045154-1.50016-2 ↗
17. Shi, M. et al. Cracks outrun erosion in degradable polymers. Extrem. Mech. Lett. 40, 100978 (2020).10.1016/j.eml.2020.100978 ↗
18. Veskova, J., Sbordone, F. & Frisch, H. Trends in polymer degradation across all scales. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 223, 2100472 (2022).10.1002/macp.202100472 ↗
19. Bartnikowski, M., Dargaville, T. R., Ivanovski, S. & Hutmacher, D. W. J. P. I. P. S. Degradation mechanisms of polycaprolactone in the context of chemistry, geometry and environment. Prog. Polym. Sci. 96, 1–20 (2019).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.05.004 ↗
20. Basu, A. & Domb, A. J. Recent advances in polyanhydride based biomaterials. Adv. Mater. 30, 1706815 (2018).10.1002/adma.201706815 ↗
21. Lin, Y., Kouznetsova, T. B. & Craig, S. L. J. J. O. T. A. C. S. Mechanically gated degradable polymers. JACS 142, 2105–2109 (2020).10.1021/jacs.9b13359 ↗
22. Pirsa, S. & Aghbolagh Sharifi, K. J. J. O. C. L. A review of the applications of bioproteins in the preparation of biodegradable films and polymers. J. Chem. Lett. 1, 47–58 (2020).
23. Su, S. & Kang, P. M. J. N. Systemic review of biodegradable nanomaterials in nanomedicine. Nanomaterials 10, 656 (2020).10.3390/nano10040656 ↗
24. Alizadeh-Osgouei, M., Li, Y. & Wen, C. J. B. M. A comprehensive review of biodegradable synthetic polymer-ceramic composites and their manufacture for biomedical applications. Bioact. Mater. 4, 22–36 (2019).
25. Hodge, J. G., Zamierowski, D. S., Robinson, J. L. & Mellott, A. J. J. B. R. Evaluating polymeric biomaterials to improve next generation wound dressing design. Biomater. Res. 26, 50 (2022).10.1186/s40824-022-00291-5 ↗
26. Klimek, K. & Ginalska, G. J. P. Proteins and peptides as important modifiers of the polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering applications—a review. Polymers 12, 844 (2020).10.3390/polym12040844 ↗
27. Wang, L., Wang, C., Wu, S., Fan, Y. & Li, X. J. B. S. Influence of the mechanical properties of biomaterials on degradability, cell behaviors and signaling pathways: current progress and challenges. Biomater. Sci. 8, 2714–2733 (2020).10.1039/D0BM00269K ↗
28. Jana, A., Das, M. & Balla, V. K. J. J. O. B. M. R. P. A. In vitro and in vivo degradation assessment and preventive measures of biodegradable Mg alloys for biomedical applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 110, 462–487 (2022).10.1002/jbm.a.37297 ↗
29. Ye, S. et al. Evaluating platelet activation related to the degradation of biomaterials using molecular markers. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 184, 110516 (2019).10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110516 ↗
30. Zhang, F. & King, M. W. J. A. H. M. Biodegradable polymers as the pivotal player in the design of tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9, 1901358 (2020).10.1002/adhm.201901358 ↗
31. Kasper, C., Witte, F. & Pörtner, R. Tissue engineering III: cell-surface interactions for tissue culture. (Springer, 2012).10.1007/978-3-642-28282-9 ↗
32. Amukarimi, S. & Mozafari, M. J. M. Biodegradable magnesium‐based biomaterials: an overview of challenges and opportunities. MedComm. 2, 123–144 (2021).10.1002/mco2.59 ↗
33. Niu, W. & Pan, J. J. J. O. T. M. B. O. B. M. A model of polymer degradation and erosion for finite element analysis of bioresorbable implants. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 112, 104022 (2020).10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104022 ↗
34. Woodard, L. N. & Grunlan, M. A. Hydrolytic degradation and erosion of polyester biomaterials. ACS Publications. ACS Publications. (2018).10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00424 ↗
35. Coury, A. J. Chemical and biochemical degradation of polymers intended to be biostable. In Biomaterials Science. 4th edn, (eds Wagner, W. R., Sakiyama-Elbert, S. E., Zhang, G., & Yaszemski, M. J.) 919–940 (Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020).10.1016/B978-0-12-816137-1.00062-3 ↗
36. Kowalczuk, D. & Pitucha, M. J. M. Application of FTIR method for the assessment of immobilization of active substances in the matrix of biomedical materials. Materials 12, 2972 (2019).10.3390/ma12182972 ↗
37. Zhou, J. et al. 1H-NMR-based metabolic analysis on biocompatibility of dental biomaterials. Process Biochem. 114, 163–173 (2020).10.1016/j.procbio.2020.01.020 ↗
38. Hammershøj, R., Birch, H., Redman, A. D. & Mayer, P. Mixture effects on biodegradation kinetics of hydrocarbons in surface water: Increasing concentrations inhibited degradation whereas multiple substrates did not. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 3087–3094 (2019).10.1021/acs.est.9b00638 ↗
39. Alam, R. et al. Biodegradation and metabolic pathway of anthraquinone dyes by Trametes hirsuta D7 immobilized in light expanded clay aggregate and cytotoxicity assessment. J. Hazard. Mater. 405, 124176 (2021).10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124176 ↗
40. Chen, L. et al. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles from root extract of Scutellaria baicalensis and its photocatalytic degradation activity using methylene blue. Optik 184, 324–329 (2019b).10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.03.051 ↗
41. Rohrer, J. S. High-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection for carbohydrate and glycoconjugate analyses. Biochemistry 78, 697–709 (2021).10.1134/S000629791307002X ↗
42. Baidurah, S. J. P. Methods of analyses for biodegradable polymers: a review. Polymers 14, 4928 (2022).10.3390/polym14224928 ↗
43. Kliem, S., Kreutzbruck, M. & Bonten, C. J. M. Review on the biological degradation of polymers in various environments. Materials 13, 4586 (2020).10.3390/ma13204586 ↗
44. Naghieh, S., Sarker, M., Sharma, N., Barhoumi, Z. & Chen, X. J. A. S. Printability of 3D printed hydrogel scaffolds: Influence of hydrogel composition and printing parameters. Appl. Sci. 10, 292 (2019).10.3390/app10010292 ↗
45. Lau, C. M. L., Jahanmir, G. & Chau, Y. J. A. B. Local environment-dependent kinetics of ester hydrolysis revealed by direct 1H NMR measurement of degrading hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 101, 219–226 (2020).10.1016/j.actbio.2019.10.030 ↗
46. Yoon, D. M. & Fisher, J. P. J. B. M. Natural and synthetic polymeric scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. 257–283 (2021).10.1007/978-3-030-49206-9_6 ↗
47. Affat, S. S. Classifications, advantages, disadvantages, toxicity effects of natural and synthetic dyes: a review. Univ. Thi-Qar J. Sci. 8, 130–135 (2021).
48. Li, C. et al. Design of biodegradable, implantable devices towards clinical translation. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 61–81 (2020).10.1038/s41578-019-0150-z ↗
49. Samir, A., Ashour, F. H., Hakim, A. A. & Bassyouni, M. J. N. M. D. Recent advances in biodegradable polymers for sustainable applications. npj Mater. Degrad. 6, 68 (2022).10.1038/s41529-022-00277-7 ↗
50. Guo, L. et al. The role of natural polymers in bone tissue engineering. J. Control. Release 338, 571–582 (2021).10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.055 ↗
51. Bao, Z., Xian, C., Yuan, Q., Liu, G. & Wu, J. J. A. H. M. Natural polymer‐based hydrogels with enhanced mechanical performances: preparation, structure, and property. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 8, 1900670 (2019).10.1002/adhm.201900670 ↗
52. Si, W., Chen, Y. P., Zhang, J., Chen, Z.-Y. & Chung, H. Y. J. F. C. Antioxidant activities of ginger extract and its constituents toward lipids. Food Chem. 239, 1117–1125 (2018).10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.07.055 ↗
53. Mendoza-Munoz, N. et al. Solid lipid nanoparticles: an approach to improve oral drug delivery. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 24, 509–532 (2021).10.18433/jpps31788 ↗
54. Mangaraj, S., Yadav, A., Bal, L. M., Dash, S. & Mahanti, N. K. Application of biodegradable polymers in food packaging industry: a comprehensive review. J. Packag. Technol. Res. 3, 77–96 (2019).10.1007/s41783-018-0049-y ↗
55. Walker, J. et al. In vitro degradation and erosion behavior of commercial PLGAs used for controlled drug delivery. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 13, 237–251 (2023).10.1007/s13346-022-01177-8 ↗
56. Shaikh, S., Yaqoob, M. & Aggarwal, P. J. C. R. I. F. S. An overview of biodegradable packaging in food industry. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 4, 503–520 (2021).10.1016/j.crfs.2021.07.005 ↗
57. Chocholata, P. et al. In situ hydroxyapatite synthesis enhances biocompatibility of PVA/HA hydrogels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 9335 (2021).10.3390/ijms22179335 ↗
58. Bashir, S. et al. Fundamental concepts of hydrogels: synthesis, properties, and their applications. Polymers 12, 2702 (2020).10.3390/polym12112702 ↗
59. Hosseini, S. S., Taheri, S., Zadhoush, A. & Mehrabani‐Zeinabad, A. J. J. O. A. P. S. Hydrolytic degradation of poly (ethylene terephthalate). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 103, 2304–2309 (2007).10.1002/app.24142 ↗
60. Xu, L., Crawford, K. & Gorman, C. B. J. M. Effects of temperature and pH on the degradation of poly (lactic acid) brushes. Macromolecules 44, 4777–4782 (2011).10.1021/ma2000948 ↗
61. Zhuo, S. et al. pH-sensitive biomaterials for drug delivery. Molecules 25, 5649 (2020).10.3390/molecules25235649 ↗
62. Juuti, H. et al. The effect of pH on the degradation of biodegradable poly (L-lactide-co-glycolide) 80/20 urethral stent material in vitro. J. Endourol. 26, 701–705 (2012).10.1089/end.2011.0199 ↗
63. Wang, L. et al. Biomechanical studies on biomaterial degradation and co-cultured cells: mechanisms, potential applications, challenges and prospects. J. Mater. Chem. B 7, 7439–7459 (2019).10.1039/C9TB01539F ↗
64. Zheng, B., Zhang, Z., Chen, F., Luo, X. & Mcclements, D. J. J. F. H. Impact of delivery system type on curcumin stability: Comparison of curcumin degradation in aqueous solutions, emulsions, and hydrogel beads. Int. Food Res. J. 71, 187–197 (2017).
65. Wach, R. A., Mitomo, H., Yoshii, F. & Kume, T. Radiation processing of biodegradable polymer hydrogel from cellulose derivatives. No. JAERI-CONF--2001-005. (2001)
66. Nagasawa, N., Mitomo, H., Yoshii, F. & Kume, T. Radiation-induced degradation of sodium alginate. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 69, 279–285 (2000).10.1016/S0141-3910(00)00070-7 ↗
67. Kumar, P., Pillay, V. & Choonara, Y. E. J. S. R. Macroporous chitosan/methoxypoly (ethylene glycol) based cryosponges with unique morphology for tissue engineering applications. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–20 (2021).10.1038/s41598-020-79139-8 ↗
68. Terzopoulou, Z. et al. Biocompatible synthetic polymers for tissue engineering purposes. Biomacromolecules 23, 1841–1863 (2022).10.1021/acs.biomac.2c00047 ↗
69. Dirauf, M., Muljajew, I., Weber, C. & Schubert, U. S. J. P. I. P. S. Recent advances in degradable synthetic polymers for biomedical applications‐Beyond polyesters. Prog. Polym. Sci. 129, 101547 (2022).10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2022.101547 ↗
70. Pantani, R., Sorrentino, A. J. P. D. & Stability. Influence of crystallinity on the biodegradation rate of injection-moulded poly (lactic acid) samples in controlled composting conditions. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 98, 1089–1096 (2013).10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.01.005 ↗
71. Domb, A. J. & Khan, W. Biodegradable polymers as drug carrier systems. Biomedical Polymers. CRC Press (2020).
72. Antti, G., Pentti, P. & Hanna, K. J. U. S. Ultrasonic degradation of aqueous carboxymethylcellulose: effect of viscosity, molecular mass, and concentration. Ultrason. Sonochem. 15, 644–648 (2008).10.1016/j.ultsonch.2007.09.005 ↗
73. Smith, R. C., Leung, A., Kim, B.-S. & Hammond, P. T. J. C. O. M. Hydrophobic effects in the critical destabilization and release dynamics of degradable multilayer films. Chem. Mater. 21, 1108–1115 (2009).10.1021/cm802972d ↗
74. Lei, H. et al. Ester bond: chemically labile yet mechanically stable. ACS Nano 17, 16870–16878 (2023a).10.1021/acsnano.3c03807 ↗
75. Zhong, Z. et al. A versatile family of degradable non-viral gene carriers based on hyperbranched poly(ester amine)s. J. Control. Release 109, 317–329 (2005).10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.06.022 ↗
76. Von Burkersroda, F., Schedl, L. & Göpferich, A. J. B. Why degradable polymers undergo surface erosion or bulk erosion. Biomaterials 23, 4221–4231 (2002).10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00170-9 ↗
77. Chen, C. et al. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of a biodegradable magnesium vascular stent designed by shape optimization strategy. Biomaterials 221, 119414 (2019a).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119414 ↗
78. Grzebieniarz, W., Biswas, D., Roy, S., Jamróz, E. J. F. P. & Life, S. Advances in biopolymer-based multi-layer film preparations and food packaging applications. Food Packag. Shelf Life 35, 101033 (2023).10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101033 ↗
79. Zadpoor, A. A. J. B. S. Meta-biomaterials. Biomater. Sci. 8, 18–38 (2020).10.1039/C9BM01247H ↗
80. Chen, W., Palazzo, A., Hennink, W. E. & Kok, R. J. J. M. P. Effect of particle size on drug loading and release kinetics of gefitinib-loaded PLGA microspheres. Mol. Pharm. 14, 459–467 (2017).10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.6b00896 ↗
81. Lucas, N. et al. Polymer biodegradation: mechanisms and estimation techniques–a review. Chemosphere 73, 429–442 (2008).10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.06.064 ↗
82. Yang, G., Phua, S. Z. F., Bindra, A. K. & Zhao, Y. J. A. M. Degradability and clearance of inorganic nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805730 (2019).10.1002/adma.201805730 ↗
83. Loh, X. J., Goh, S. H. & Li, J. J. B. Hydrolytic degradation and protein release studies of thermogelling polyurethane copolymers consisting of poly [(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate], poly (ethylene glycol), and poly (propylene glycol). Biomaterials 28, 4113–4123 (2007).10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.016 ↗
84. Assegehegn, G., Brito-De La Fuente, E., Franco, J. M. & Gallegos, C. J. J. O. P. S. The importance of understanding the freezing step and its impact on freeze-drying process performance. J. Pharm. Sci. 108, 1378–1395 (2019).10.1016/j.xphs.2018.11.039 ↗
85. Gaidhani, K. A., Harwalkar, M., Bhambere, D. & Nirgude, P. S. J. W. J. O. P. R. Lyophilization/freeze drying–a review. World J. Pharm. Res. 4, 516–543 (2015).
86. Hazarika, U. & Gosztola, B. J. A. S. P. T. A. Lyophilization and its effects on the essential oil content and composition of herbs and spices–a review. Acta Sci. Pol. Technol. Aliment. 19, 467–473 (2020).
87. Zhang, X., Li, Y., Ma, Z., He, D. & Li, H. J. B. M. Modulating degradation of sodium alginate/bioglass hydrogel for improving tissue infiltration and promoting wound healing. Bioact. Mater. 6, 3692–3704 (2021).
88. Mylonaki, I., Allémann, E., Delie, F. & Jordan, O. J. J. O. C. R. Imaging the porous structure in the core of degrading PLGA microparticles: the effect of molecular weight. J. Control. Release 286, 231–239 (2018).10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.07.044 ↗
89. Liu, S. et al. Degradation behavior in vitro of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)/poly (lactic acid)(PLA) composite suture. Polymers 11, 1015 (2019).10.3390/polym11061015 ↗
90. Ahire, J. J., Neppalli, R., Heunis, T. D., Van Reenen, A. J. & Dicks, L. M. J. C. M. 2, 3-dihydroxybenzoic acid electrospun into poly (d, l-lactide)(PDLLA)/poly (ethylene oxide)(PEO) nanofibers inhibited the growth of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Curr. Microbiol. 69, 587–593 (2014).10.1007/s00284-014-0635-3 ↗
91. Biondi, M. et al. Bioactivated collagen-based scaffolds embedding protein-releasing biodegradable microspheres: tuning of protein release kinetics. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 20, 2117–2128 (2009).
92. Jiang, K., Shen, M. & Xu, W. J. I. J. O. N. Arginine, glycine, aspartic acid peptide-modified paclitaxel and curcumin co-loaded liposome for the treatment of lung cancer: in vitro/vivo evaluation. Int. J. Nanomed. 13, 2561 (2018).10.2147/IJN.S157746 ↗
93. Du Toit, L. C. et al. In vitro, in vivo, and in silico evaluation of the bioresponsive behavior of an intelligent intraocular implant. Pharm. Res. 31, 607–634 (2014).10.1007/s11095-013-1184-3 ↗
94. Kumar, P., Choonara, Y. E., Du Toit, L. C., Singh, N. & Pillay, V. J. P. In vitro and in silico analyses of nicotine release from a gelisphere-loaded compressed polymeric matrix for potential Parkinson’s disease interventions. Pharmaceutics 10, 233 (2018).10.3390/pharmaceutics10040233 ↗
95. Omranian, S. R. et al. Assessing the potential of application of titanium dioxide for photocatalytic degradation of deposited soot on asphalt pavement surfaces. Constr. Build. Mater. 350, 128859 (2022).10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128859 ↗
96. Franck, A. & Germany, T. J. T. I. New Castle, DE, USA An004 viscoelasticity and dynamic mechanical testing. TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA AN004 (1993).
97. Datta, D., Halder, G. J. P. S. & Protection, E. Effect of media on degradability, physico-mechanical and optical properties of synthesized polyolefinic and PLA film in comparison with casted potato/corn starch biofilm. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 124, 39–62 (2019).10.1016/j.psep.2019.02.002 ↗
98. Maurya, A. K., De Souza, F. M., Dawsey, T. & Gupta, R. K. J. P. C. Biodegradable polymers and composites: recent development and challenges. Polym. Compos. 45, 2896–2918 (2024).10.1002/pc.28023 ↗
99. Tibbitt, M. W., Kloxin, A. M., Sawicki, L. A. & Anseth, K. S. J. M. Mechanical properties and degradation of chain and step-polymerized photodegradable hydrogels. Macromolecules 46, 2785–2792 (2013).10.1021/ma302522x ↗
100. Adib, A. A. et al. Direct-write 3D printing and characterization of a GelMA-based biomaterial for intracorporeal tissue engineering. Biofabrication 12, 045006 (2020).10.1088/1758-5090/ab97a1 ↗