Insights from quasi-in situ cryogenic-transfer atom probe tomography for analyzing hydrogen diffusion in metallic alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Understanding hydrogen embrittlement mechanisms requires insights into nanoscale hydrogen isotope segregation in materials. Cryogenic-transfer atom probe tomography (APT) can provide this insight, if the sample exposure is precisely controlled. Therefore, we quantified the nanoscale changes of in austenitic FeCrNi alloy during ultrahigh vacuum transfer using a LEAP 6000 XR APT system with UV laser-assisted and voltage-pulsed modes. We introduced a quasi-in situ method to study deuterium out-diffusion kinetics from electrochemically charged FeCrNi needles, which involved analyzing a deuterium-charged sample using APT, pausing for controlled thermal treatments at room temperature and 150°C, followed by reanalysis. Comparison of experimental results with a heat transfer–hydrogen diffusion model showed that slow deuterium out-diffusion was due to an oxide layer acting as a permeation barrier. These findings highlight the importance of managing sample exposure during cryogenic-transfer APT and demonstrate this quasi-in situ method’s potential for studying hydrogen isotope diffusion in metallic alloys.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen, Y.-S. et al. Atom probe tomography for the observation of hydrogen in materials: a review. Microsc. Microanal. 29, 1–15 (2023).10.1093/micmic/ozac005 ↗
2. Breen, A. J. et al. Solute hydrogen and deuterium observed at the near atomic scale in high-strength steel. Acta Mater. 188, 108–120 (2020).10.1016/j.actamat.2020.02.004 ↗
3. Chen, Y.-S. et al. Hydrogen trapping and embrittlement in metals—a review. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.076 (2024).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.076 ↗
4. Barton, D. J. et al. Towards quantitative analysis of deuterium absorption in ferrite and austenite during electrochemical charging by comparing cyclic voltammetry and cryogenic transfer atom probe tomography. Int J. Hydrog. Energy 50, 30–40 (2024).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.256 ↗
5. Gault, B. et al. Towards establishing best practice in the analysis of hydrogen and deuterium by atom probe tomography. Microsc. Microanal. https://doi.org/10.1093/mam/ozae081 (2024).10.1093/mam/ozae081 ↗
6. Weiss, Z. Analysis of hydrogen in inorganic materials and coatings: a critical review. Hydrogen 2, 225–245 (2021).10.3390/hydrogen2020012 ↗
7. Yang, L. X. et al. Three-dimensional hydrogen distribution and quantitative determination of titanium alloys via neutron tomography. Analyst 145, 4156–4163 (2020).10.1039/D0AN00416B ↗
8. Arif, M., Hussey, D. S. & Jacobson, D. L. in Neutron Scattering Applications and Techniques 191–207 (Springer US, 2009).10.1007/978-0-387-78693-3_11 ↗
9. Silverstein, R., Eliezer, D. & Tal-Gutelmacher, E. Hydrogen trapping in alloys studied by thermal desorption spectrometry. J. Alloy Compd. 747, 511–522 (2018).10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.066 ↗
10. Paudel, B. et al. ToF-SIMS in material research: a view from nanoscale hydrogen detection. Mater. Today 75, 149–165 (2024).10.1016/j.mattod.2024.03.003 ↗
11. Evers, S., Senöz, C. & Rohwerder, M. Hydrogen detection in metals: a review and introduction of a Kelvin probe approach. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mat. 14, 01420110 (2013).10.1088/1468-6996/14/1/014201 ↗
12. Koyama, M. et al. Spatially and kinetically resolved mapping of hydrogen in a twinning-induced plasticity steel by use of scanning kelvin probe force microscopy. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, C638–C647 (2015).10.1149/2.0131512jes ↗
13. G. Andreasen, A. Visintin, R. C. Salvarezza, W. E. Triaca, A. & Arvia, A. J. Hydrogen-induced deformations of metals followed by in situ scanning tunneling microscopy. Palladium electrolytic hydrogen charging and discharging in alkaline solution. https://doi.org/10.1021/la980633 (1998).10.1021/la980633 ↗
14. An, B., Iijima, T., San Marchi, C. & Somerday, B. Micromechanisms of Hydrogen-Assisted Cracking in Super Duplex Stainless Steel Investigated by Scanning Probe Microscopy. Volume 6B: Materials and Fabrication https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2014-28181 (2014).10.1115/PVP2014-28181 ↗
15. Devaraj, A. et al. Three-dimensional nanoscale characterisation of materials by atom probe tomography. Int. Mater. Rev. 63, 68–101 (2017).10.1080/09506608.2016.1270728 ↗
16. Meier, M. S., Jones, M. E., Felfer, P. J., Moody, M. P. & Haley, D. Extending estimating hydrogen content in atom probe tomography experiments where H molecule formation occurs. Microsc Microanal. 28, 1231–1244 (2022).10.1017/S1431927621012332 ↗
17. Chang, Y. H. et al. Characterizing solute hydrogen and hydrides in pure and alloyed titanium at the atomic scale. Acta Mater. 150, 273–280 (2018).10.1016/j.actamat.2018.02.064 ↗
18. Kesten, P. et al. H- and D distribution in metallic multilayers studied by 3-dimensional atom probe analysis and secondary ion mass spectrometry. J. Alloy Compd. 330, 225–228 (2002).10.1016/S0925-8388(01)01596-1 ↗
19. Sundell, G., Thuvander, M., Yatim, A. K., Nordin, H. & Andrén, H. O. Direct observation of hydrogen and deuterium in oxide grain boundaries in corroded Zirconium alloys. Corros. Sci. 90, 1–4 (2015).10.1016/j.corsci.2014.10.016 ↗
20. Chen, Y. S. et al. Direct observation of individual hydrogen atoms at trapping sites in a ferritic steel. Science 355, 1196–1199 (2017).10.1126/science.aal2418 ↗
21. Takahashi, J., Kawakami, K., Otsuka, H. & Fujii, H. Atom probe analysis of titanium hydride precipitates. Ultramicroscopy 109, 568–573 (2009).10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.11.012 ↗
22. Hudson, D., Cerezo, A. & Smith, G. D. W. Zirconium oxidation on the atomic scale. Ultramicroscopy 109, 667–671 (2009).10.1016/j.ultramic.2008.10.020 ↗
23. Takahashi, J., Kawakami, K. & Kobayashi, Y. Origin of hydrogen trapping site in vanadium carbide precipitation strengthening steel. Acta Mater. 153, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.003 (2018).10.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.003 ↗
24. Takahashi, J., Kawakami, K., Kobayashi, Y. & Tarui, T. The first direct observation of hydrogen trapping sites in TiC precipitation-hardening steel through atom probe tomography. Scr. Mater. 63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.012 (2010).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.012 ↗
25. Macauley, C., Heller, M., Rausch, A., Kummel, F. & Felfer, P. A versatile cryo-transfer system, connecting cryogenic focused ion beam sample preparation to atom probe microscopy. PLoS ONE 16, e0245555 (2021).10.1371/journal.pone.0245555 ↗
26. Zhao, H. et al. Hydrogen trapping and embrittlement in high-strength Al alloys. Nature 602, 437 (2022).10.1038/s41586-021-04343-z ↗
27. Chang, Y. H. et al. Ti and its alloys as examples of cryogenic focused ion beam milling of environmentally-sensitive materials. Nat. Commun. 10, 942 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-08752-7 ↗
28. Chang, Y. H. et al. Quantification of solute deuterium in titanium deuteride by atom probe tomography with both laser pulsing and high-voltage pulsing: influence of the surface electric field. New J. Phys. 21, 053025 (2019).10.1088/1367-2630/ab1c3b ↗
29. Takamizawa, H. et al. Three-dimensional characterization of deuterium implanted in silicon using atom probe tomography. Appl. Phys. Express 6, 066602 (2013).10.7567/APEX.6.066602 ↗
30. Khanchandani, H. et al. Laser-equipped gas reaction chamber for probing environmentally sensitive materials at near atomic scale. Plos ONE 17, e0262543 (2022).10.1371/journal.pone.0262543 ↗
31. Takahashi, J., Kawakami, K., Sakiyama, Y. & Ohmura, T. Atomic-scale observation of hydrogen trap sites in bainite-austenite dual-phase steel by APT. Mater. Charact. 178, 111282 (2021).10.1016/j.matchar.2021.111282 ↗
32. Chen, Y. S., Bagot, P. A. J., Moody, M. P. & Haley, D. Observing hydrogen in steel using cryogenic atom probe tomography: a simplified approach. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 44, 32280–32291 (2019).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.232 ↗
33. Chen, Y.-S., Griffith, M. J. & Cairney, J. M. Cryo atom probe: freezing atoms in place for 3D mapping. Nano Today 37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101107 (2021).10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101107 ↗
34. McCarroll, I. E., Bagot, P. A. J., Devaraj, A., Perea, D. E. & Cairney, J. M. New frontiers in atom probe tomography: a review of research enabled by cryo and/or vacuum transfer systems. Mater. Today Adv. 7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100090 (2020).10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100090 ↗
35. Stephenson, L. T. et al. The Laplace Project: an integrated suite for preparing and transferring atom probe samples under cryogenic and UHV conditions. PLoS One 13, e0209211 (2018).10.1371/journal.pone.0209211 ↗
36. Woods, E. V. et al. A versatile and reproducible cryo-sample preparation methodology for atom probe studies. Microsc. Microanal. 29, 1992–2003 (2023).10.1093/micmic/ozad120 ↗
37. Jakob, S., Sattari, M., Sefer, B., Ooi, S. & Thuvander, M. Characterization of hydrogen traps in a co-precipitation steel investigated by atom probe experiments without cryogenic transfer. Scr. Mater. 243, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115963 (2024).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115963 ↗
38. Wang, S. et al. Systematic quantification of hydrogen in pipeline steel by atom probe tomography after ambient charging and transfer. Npj Mater. Degrad. 8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41529-024-00528-9 (2024).10.1038/s41529-024-00528-9 ↗
39. Schwarz, T. M. et al. Quasi‐“in situ” analysis of the reactive liquid‐solid interface during magnesium corrosion using cryo‐atom probe tomography. Adv. Mater. 36, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202401735 (2024).10.1002/adma.202401735 ↗
40. Zhou, Z. et al. Cryogenic atom probe tomography and its applications: a review. Microstructures 3, https://doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2023.38 (2023).10.20517/microstructures.2023.38 ↗
41. Chen, Y. S. et al. Observation of hydrogen trapping at dislocations, grain boundaries, and precipitates. Science 367, 171 (2020).10.1126/science.aaz0122 ↗
42. Jakob, S. & Thuvander, M. Revisiting compositional accuracy of carbides using a decreased detector efficiency in a LEAP 6000 XR atom probe instrument. Microsc. Microanal. https://doi.org/10.1093/mam/ozae069 (2024).10.1093/mam/ozae069 ↗
43. Jakob, S., Thuvander, M. & Ooi, S. W. Comparison of hydrogen resilience of three different corrosion-resistant martensitic steels. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5028452.10.2139/ssrn.5028452 ↗
44. Saksena, A. et al. Optimizing site-specific specimen preparation for atom probe tomography by using hydrogen for visualizing radiation-induced damage. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.057 (2024).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.057 ↗
45. Li, Y. et al. Mechanism and evaluation of hydrogen permeation barriers: a critical review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 62, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02259 (2023).10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02259 ↗
46. Rai, S. et al. Deuterium permeation studies through bare and Er2O3 coated SS 316L. Fusion Eng. Des. 206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fusengdes.2024.114587 (2024).10.1016/j.fusengdes.2024.114587 ↗
47. He, D. et al. Preparation of Cr2O3 film by MOCVD as hydrogen permeation barrier. Fusion Eng. Des. 89, 35–39 (2014).10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.11.005 ↗
48. Lee, S. K., Yun, S. H., Joo, H. G. & Noh, S. J. Deuterium transport and isotope effects in type 316L stainless steel at high temperatures for nuclear fusion and nuclear hydrogen technology applications. Curr. Appl Phys. 14, 1385–1388 (2014).10.1016/j.cap.2014.08.006 ↗
49. Ishikawa, Y., Yoshimura, T. & Arai, M. Effect of surface oxide layers on deuterium permeation through stainless steels with reference to outgassing reduction in ultra-to extremely high vacuum. Vacuum 47, 357–361 (1996).10.1016/0042-207X(95)00251-0 ↗
50. Ishikawa, Y., Yoshimura, T. & Arai, M. Effect of surface oxides on the permeation of deuterium through stainless steel. Vacuum 47, 701–704 (1996).10.1016/0042-207X(96)00051-6 ↗
51. Xing, B., Wu, J., Cheng, J., Zhang, L. & Wu, M. Hydrogen diffusion in α-Fe2O3: Implication for an effective hydrogen diffusion barrier. Int J. Hydrog. Energy 45, 32648–32653 (2020).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.263 ↗
52. Stover, D., Buchkremer, P. H. & Hecker, R. Hydrogen and deuterium permeation through metallic and surface-oxidized chromium. Surf. Coat. Technol. 28, 281–290 (1986).10.1016/0257-8972(86)90085-X ↗
53. Hecker, R., Stover, D., Jonas, H. & Buchkremer, H. P. Properties of chromia scales on high temperature alloys used as barriers against hydrogen permeation. J. Nucl. Mater. 171, 84–93 (1990).10.1016/0022-3115(90)90351-M ↗
54. Oya, Y. et al. Effect of surface oxide layer on deuterium permeation behaviors through a type 316 stainless steel. Fusion Eng. Des. 87, 580–583 (2012).10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.01.025 ↗
55. Haley, D., Merzlikin, S. V., Choi, P. & Raabe, D. Atom probe tomography observation of hydrogen in high-Mn steel and silver charged via an electrolytic route. Int J. Hydrog. Energy 39, 12221–12229 (2014).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.169 ↗
56. Padavala, S. K. M. & Stoerzinger, K. A. Role of hydride formation in electrocatalysis for sustainable chemical transformations. ACS Catal. 13, https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.3c00204 (2023).10.1021/acscatal.3c00204 ↗
57. Fukai, Y. & Suzuki, T. Iron‐water reaction under high pressure and its implication in the evolution of the Earth. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 91, https://doi.org/10.1029/JB091iB09p09222 (1986).10.1029/JB091iB09p09222 ↗
58. Bagrets, N., Heller, R., Weis, J. R. & Weiss, K. P. Thermal resistance between metallic surfaces of copper and stainless steel at different temperatures and applied forces for high current HTS cable-in-conduit conductors. IEEE Trans. Appl Supercond. 32, 1–5 (2022).10.1109/TASC.2022.3154327 ↗
59. Röttger, A. et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of 316L austenitic stainless steel processed by different SLM devices. Int J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 108, 769–783 (2020).10.1007/s00170-020-05371-1 ↗
60. Guyer, J. E., Wheeler, D. & Warren, J. A. FiPy: Partial differential equations with Python. Comput Sci. Eng. 11, 6–15 (2009).10.1109/MCSE.2009.52 ↗
61. Dilthey, U., Trube, S., Pokhodnya, I. & Pavlik, V. Determination of the diffusion coefficient of hydrogen in steel subjected to deformation and in weld deposits of basic and rutile coated electrodes. Weld Res. Abroad 4, 2–5 (1993).
62. Farrell, K. & Lewis, M. B. The hydrogen content of austenite after cathodic charging. Scr. Met. 15, 661–664 (1981).10.1016/0036-9748(81)90047-8 ↗